We consider functionals of the calculus of variations subjected to constraints of the form ∫Ωg(x,u) dx=1\int_\Omega g(x, u)\, dx = 1. We identify the relaxed problem and we show that, when a lack of compactness occurs, the constraint may relax to a gap term.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Giuseppe Buttazzo

Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy.

Victor J. Mizel

Department of Mathematics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

  1. G. Alberti, P. Majer: Gap phenomenon for some autonomous functionals. J. Conv. Anal., 1 (1994), 31–45.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca01002Google Scholar
  2. G. Alberti, F. Serra Cassano: paper in preparation.Google Scholar
  3. L. Ambrosio, O. Ascenzi, G. Buttazzo: Lipschitz regularity for minimizers of integral functionals with highly discontinuous integrands. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 142 (1989), 301–316.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(89)90001-2Google Scholar
  4. T. S. Angell: A note on the approximation of optimal solutions of the calculus of variations. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 2 (1979), 258–272.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844099Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Ball, G. Knowles: A numerical method for detecting singular minimizers. Numer. Math., 51 (1987), 181–197.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01396748Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Ball, V. J. Mizel: Singular minimizers for regular one-dimensional problems in the calculus of variations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 11 (1984), 143–146.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-1984-15241-8Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Ball, V. J. Mizel: One-dimensional variational problems whose minimizers do not satisfy the Euler-Lagrange equation. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 90 (1985), 325–388.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276295Google Scholar
  8. M. Belloni: Rilassamento di problemi variazionali con fenomeno di Lavrentiev. Ph. D. Thesis, Dipartimento di Matematica Università di Pisa, Pisa (1995).Google Scholar
  9. F. Bethuel, H. Brezis, J. M. Coron: Relaxed energies for harmonic maps. Proceedings of “Variational Methods”, Paris, June 1988, Birkhäuser, Boston (1990), 37–52.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1080-9_3Google Scholar
  10. G. Buttazzo: Semicontinuity, Relaxation and Integral Representation in the Calculus of Variations. Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser. 207, Longman, Harlow (1989).Google Scholar
  11. G. Buttazzo: The Lavrentiev phenomenon for variational problems. Proceedings of “Nonlinear Analysis - Calculus of Variations”, Perugia 9–12 May 1993, (to appear).Google Scholar
  12. G. Buttazzo, V. J. Mizel: Interpretation of the Lavrentiev phenomenon by relaxation. J. Funct. Anal., 110 (1992), 434–460.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(92)90038-KGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Cesari: Optimization-Theory and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1983).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8165-5Google Scholar
  14. L. Cesari, T. S. Angell: On the Lavrentiev phenomenon. Calcolo, 22 (1985), 17–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02576198Google Scholar
  15. C. W. Cheng, V. J. Mizel: On the Lavrentiev phenomenon for autonomous second order integrands. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 126 (1994), 21–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375694Google Scholar
  16. V. Chiadò Piat, F. Serra Cassano: Some remarks about the density of smooth functions in weighted Sobolev spaces. J. Conv. Anal., (to appear).Google Scholar
  17. F. H. Clarke, R. B. Vinter: Regularity properties of solutions to the basic problem in the calculus of variations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 291 (1985), 73–98.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1985-0779053-3Google Scholar
  18. A. Corbo Esposito, R. De Arcangelis: Comparison results for some types of relaxation of variational integral functionals. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., (to appear).Google Scholar
  19. A. M. Davie: Singular minimizers in the calculus of variations in one dimension. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 101 (1988), 161–177.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251459Google Scholar
  20. R. De Arcangelis: Some remarks on the identity between a variational integral and its relaxed functional. Ann. Univ. Ferrara, 35 (1989), 135–145.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825214Google Scholar
  21. R. De Arcangelis: The Lavrentieff phenomenon for quadratic functionals. Preprint Università di Napoli, Napoli (1993).Google Scholar
  22. M. Giaquinta, G. Modica, J. Soucek: The Dirichlet energy of mappings with values into the sphere. Manuscripta Math., 65 (1989), 489–507.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172794Google Scholar
  23. A. C. Heinricher: A singular stochastic control problem arising from a deterministic problem with non-Lipschitzian minimizers. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon Math. Dept. (1986).Google Scholar
  24. A. C. Heinricher, V. J. Mizel: A stochastic control problem with different value functions for singular and absolutely continuous control. Proceedings 25th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Athens 1986, 134–139.https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1986.267171Google Scholar
  25. A. C. Heinricher, V. J. Mizel: The Lavrentiev phenomenon for invariant variational problems. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 102 (1988), 57–93.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250924Google Scholar
  26. A. C. Heinricher, V. J. Mizel: A new example of the Lavrentiev phenomenon. SIAM J. Control Optim., 26 (1988), 1490–1503.https://doi.org/10.1137/0326087Google Scholar
  27. T. Kilpelainen, P. Lindqvist: The Lavrentiev phenomenon and the Dirichlet integral. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., (to appear).Google Scholar
  28. G.Knowles: Finite element approximation to singular minimizers, and applications to cavitation in nonlinear elasticity. Proceedings of “Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics”, Birmingham 1986, Lecture Notes in Math. 1285 (1987), 236–247.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0080603Google Scholar
  29. M. Lavrentiev: Sur quelques problèmes du calcul des variations. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 4 (1926), 107–124.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409983Google Scholar
  30. I. F. Lezenina, P. E. Sobolevskii: Elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems with singular estimates of coefficients. Dokl. Acad. Nauk. Ukrain. SSR, (1989), 27–31.Google Scholar
  31. P. D. Loewen: On the Lavrentiev phenomenon. Canad. Math. Bull., 30 (1987), 102–108.https://doi.org/10.4153/CMB-1987-015-7Google Scholar
  32. B. Manià: Sopra un esempio di Lavrentieff. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital., 13 (1934), 146–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02413436Google Scholar
  33. M. Marcus, V. J. Mizel: Absolute continuity on tracks and mappings of Sobolev spaces. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 45 (1972), 294–320.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251378Google Scholar
  34. M. Marcus, V. J. Mizel: Continuity of certain Nemitsky operators on Sobolev spaces and the chain rule. J. Analyse Math., 28 (1975), 303–334.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02786819Google Scholar
  35. V. J. Mizel: The Lavrentiev phenomenon in both deterministic and stochastic optimization problems. Proceedings of “Integral Functionals in Calculus of Variations”, Trieste 1985, Suppl. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 15 (1987), 111–130.Google Scholar
  36. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970).Google Scholar
  37. L. Tonelli: Sur une méthode du calcul des variations. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 39 (1915), 233–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015981Google Scholar
  38. L. Tonelli: Sur une question du calcul des variations. Rec. Math. Moscou, 33 (1926), 87–98.Google Scholar
  39. T. Zolezzi: Well-posedness and the Lavrentiev phenomenon. SIAM J. Control Optim., 30 (1992), 787–799.https://doi.org/10.1137/0330043Google Scholar

G. Buttazzo, V. J. Mizel. “On a Gap Phenomenon for Isoperimetrically Constrained Variational Problems.” Journal of Convex Analysis 2 (1995), No. 1&2, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca02006