An axiomatic description of antihomogeneous conjugacy operators is suggested and some properties of these operators are established. Moreover several examples are given.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Alexander Rubinov

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Natural Science, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel.

  1. V. M. Alexeev, E. Galeev and V. M. Tikhomirov: Collection of optimization problems, Moscow, Nauka, 1984 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. E. J. Balder: An extension of duality-stability results to nonconvex optimization problems, SIAM J. Control and Optimization, 15(2) (1977) 329–343.https://doi.org/10.1137/0315022Google Scholar
  3. G. Birkhoff: Lattice theory, 2nd ed., New York, 1948.Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Borwein: Adjoint process duality, Math. Oper. Research, 8 (1983) 403–434.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.8.3.403Google Scholar
  5. J. P. Crouzeix: A duality framework in quasiconvex programming, in S.Schaible, W.T.Ziemba (eds): Generalized concavity in optimization and Economics, Academic Press, New York (1981) 109–130.Google Scholar
  6. A. G. Kusraev: Vector duality and its application, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1985 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  7. A. G. Kusraev, S. S. Kutateladze: Subdifferentials. Theory and applications, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1992 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  8. S. S. Kutateladze, A. M. Rubinov: Minkowski duality and its applications, Russian Math. Surveys, 27 (3) (1972) 137–192.https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1972v027n03ABEH001380Google Scholar
  9. V. L. Makarov, A. M. Rubinov: Mathematical theory of economic dynamics and equilibria, Springer-Varlag, Berlin, 1977.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9886-1Google Scholar
  10. J.-E. Martinez-Legaz: Generalized conjugation and related topics, Generalized convexity and fractional programming with economic applications, Lecture notes in Econ. and Mathem. Systems, 345, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1990) 198–219.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46709-7_13Google Scholar
  11. J.-E. Martinez-Legaz: Quasiconvex duality theory by generalized conjugation methods, Optimization 19 (1988) 603–652.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331938808843379Google Scholar
  12. J.-E. Martinez-Legaz, I. Singer: Dualities between complete lattices, Optimization 21 (1990) 481–508.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331939008843573Google Scholar
  13. J.-P. Penot, M. Volle: On quasi-convex duality, Math. Oper. Research 15 (1990) 597–625.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.15.4.597Google Scholar
  14. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.Google Scholar
  15. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex algebra and duality in dynamic models of production, in J. Los, M. W. Los (eds): Mathematical models in Economics, North-Holland Publ. Comp., Amsterdam (1974) 351–378.Google Scholar
  16. A. M. Rubinov: Superlinear multivalued mappings and their applications to problems of mathematical economics, Nauka, Leningrad, 1980 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  17. A. M. Rubinovi, B. Shimshek: Conjugate quasiconvex nonegative functions, Working Paper 9/94, School of Mathematics and Computing, University of Ballarat, August 1994.Google Scholar
  18. A. M. Rubinov, A. A. Yagubov: The space of star-shaped sets and its applications in nonsmooth optimization, Math. Programming Study, 29 (1986) 175–202.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121146Google Scholar
  19. A. M. Rubinov, A. A. Yagubov: Of the operator of polarity, Optimizatcia, No 35 (52) (1985) 36 - 42 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  20. I. Singer: Conjugation Operators, in G.Hammer and D.Pallaschke (eds): Selected topics in operation research and mathematical economics, Lecture Notes in Econ. and Math. Systems 226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1984) 80–97.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45567-4_6Google Scholar
  21. C. Zalinesku: Letter to the editor: on Borwein’s paper, “Adjoint process duality”, Matem. Oper. Research, 11 (1986) 692–698.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.11.4.692Google Scholar

A. Rubinov. “Antihomogeneous Conjugacy Operators in Convex Analysis.” Journal of Convex Analysis 2 (1995), No. 1&2, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca02020