Abstract
Pairs of compact convex sets naturally arise in quasidifferential calculus as the sub- and superdifferentials of the directional derivative of a quasidifferentiable function (see [1]). Since the sub- and superdifferential in a given point are not uniquely determined, minimal representations are of special importance. For the 2-dimensional case, equivalent minimal pairs of compact convex sets are uniquely determined up to translations (see [2],[13]). For the 3-dimensional case, J. Grzybowski [2] gave an example of finitely many equivalent minimal pairs of compact convex sets which are not connected by translations. In this paper we construct for the 3-dimensional case a continuum of equivalent minimal pairs of compact convex sets which are not connected by translation for different indices. Moreover, we present a more general method of reducing pairs of compact convex sets by hyperplanes as in [7].
References
- V. F. Demyanov, A.M. Rubinov: Quasidifferential Calculus, Optimization Software Inc., Publication Division, New York, 1986.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121132Google Scholar
- J. Grzybowski: On minimal pairs of convex compact sets, Archiv der Mathematik 63 (1994) 173–181.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189892Google Scholar
- J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty: Miscellanies on Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization, in: Nondifferentiable Optimization: Motivations and Applications, Proceedings, Sopron, Hungary (1984) Eds.: V.F.Demyanov, D. Pallaschke, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathem. Systems, Vol. 255, Springer, Heidelberg (1985) 8–24.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12603-5_2Google Scholar
- L. Hörmander: Sur la fonction d’appui des ensembles convexes dans une espace localement convexe, Arkiv för Mat. 3 (1954) 181–186.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589354Google Scholar
- D. Pallaschke, S. Scholtes and R. Urbański: On Minimal Pairs of Compact Convex Sets, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. 39 (1) (1991) 1–5.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca04001Google Scholar
- D. Pallaschke, R. Urbański: Some Criteria for the Minimality of Pairs of Compact Convex Sets, Zeitschrift für Operations Research (ZOR), Series Theory 37 (1993) 129–150.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414153Google Scholar
- D. Pallaschke, R. Urbański: Reduction of Quasidifferentials and Minimal Representations, Math. Programming, Series A 66 (1994) 161–180.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581143Google Scholar
- A. G. Pinsker: The space of convex sets of a locally convex space, Trudy Leningrad Engineering-Economic Institute, 63 (1966) 13–17.Google Scholar
- H. Rådström: An embedding theorem for spaces of convex sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1952) 165–169.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1952-0045938-2Google Scholar
- R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 1970.Google Scholar
- A. M. Rubinov, I. S. Akhundov: Differences of compact sets in the sense of Demyanov and its Application to Non-Smooth Analysis, Optimization 23 (1992) 179–189.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331939208843757Google Scholar
- G. T. Sallee: On the indecomposibility of the cone, Journ. London Math. Soc. 9 (1974) 363–367.https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s2-9.2.363Google Scholar
- S. Scholtes: Minimal pairs of convex bodies in two dimensions, Mathematika 39 (1992) 267–273.https://doi.org/10.1112/S002557930001500XGoogle Scholar
- R. Urbański: A generalization of the Minkowski-Rådström-Hörmander Theorem, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. 24 (1976) 709–715.Google Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 1996. Rights now held by Banach Press.
