We establish (i) that the quasiconvexification of the distance function to any closed (possibly unbounded) subset of the space of conformal matrices E∂E_\partial in M²×² is bounded from below by the distance function itself, that is, Q dist(·, K) ≥ c dist(·, K), where c > 0 is a constant independent of K; (ii) some estimates of quasiconvexifications of the distance function to a closed subset of M²×² which is ‘supported’ by E∂E_\partial; (iii) Q distᵖ(·, K) = Q distᵖ(·, Qₚ(K)) for any p ≥ 1 and any closed K ⊂ Mᴺ×ⁿ; (iv) for some nonconvex K ⊂ M²×², Q dist(·, K) is homogeneous of degree one, conjugate invariant and convex, and Q₁(K) = C(K).

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Kewei Zhang

Department of Mathematics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney 2109, Australia

  1. J. M. Ball: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 63 (1977) 337-403.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279992Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Ball, R. D. James: Proposed experimental tests of a theory of fine microstructures and the two-well problem, Phil. Royal Soc. Lon. 338A (1992) 389-450.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1992.0013Google Scholar
  3. M. Chipot, D. Kinderlehrer: Equilibrium configurations of crystals, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 103 (1988) 237-277.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251759Google Scholar
  4. B. Dacorogna: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin et al., 1989.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51440-1Google Scholar
  5. B. Dacorogna: On rank one convex functions which are homogeneous of degree one (1994), preprint.Google Scholar
  6. I. Ekeland, R. Temam: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, North-Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. I. Fonseca: The lower quasiconvex envelope of the stored energy function for an elastic crystal, J. Math. Pures et Appl. 67 (1988) 175-195.Google Scholar
  8. Z. Iqbal, K.-W. Zhang: Quasiconvex functions, subspaces without rank-one connections and linear elliptic systems, in preparation.Google Scholar
  9. C. B. Jr Morrey: Multiple Integrals in the Calculus of Variations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin et al., 1966.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69952-1Google Scholar
  10. S. Müller: On quasiconvex functions which are homogeneous of degree one, Indiana Math. J. 41 (1992) 295-300.https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1992.41.41017Google Scholar
  11. E. M. Stein: Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970.https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883882Google Scholar
  12. V. Šverák: Quasiconvex functions with subquadratic growth, Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. 433A (1991) 733-752.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1991.0073Google Scholar
  13. V. Šverák: Rank one convexity does not imply quasiconvexity, Proc. Royal Soc. Edin. 120A (1992) 185-189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500015080Google Scholar
  14. B.-S. Yan: Remarks on the set of quasi-conformal matrices in higher dimensions (1994), preprint.Google Scholar
  15. K.-W. Zhang: On non-negative quasiconvex functions with unbounded zero sets, Proc. Royal Soc. Edin. 127A (1997) 411-422.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500023726Google Scholar
  16. K.-W. Zhang: Quasiconvex functions, SO(n) and two elastic wells, Anal. Nonlin. H. Poincaré Inst. 14 (1997) 759-785.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0294-1449(97)80132-1Google Scholar

K. Zhang. “On Some Quasiconvex Functions with Linear Growth.” Journal of Convex Analysis 5 (1998), No. 1, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca05-10