Abstract
We report on an attempt to find a counterexample to the statement that rank-one convexity does not imply quasiconvexity in the case of 2×2 matrices. The failure of such attempt is a consequence of some surprising computations.
References
- E. Acerbi, N. Fusco: A regularity theorem for minimizers of quasiconvex integrals, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 99 (1987) 261-281.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00284509Google Scholar
- J. M. Ball: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 63 (1977) 337-403.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279992Google Scholar
- J. M. Ball: Sets of gradients with no rank-one connections, J. Math. Pures Appl. 69 (1990) 241-259.Google Scholar
- B. Dacorogna: Quasiconvexity and relaxation of non convex variational problems, J. Funct. Anal. 46 (1982) 102-118.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(82)90046-5Google Scholar
- B. Dacorogna: Remarques sur les notions de polyconvexité, quasi-convexité et convexité de rang 1, J. Math. Pures Appl. 64 (1985) 403-438.Google Scholar
- B. Dacorogna: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin et al., 1989.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51440-1Google Scholar
- J. Kristensen: On the non-locality of quasiconvexity, preprint, 1996.Google Scholar
- G. Milton: The moduli of composites (in preparation).Google Scholar
- Ch. B. Morrey: Quasiconvexity and the lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals, Pacific J. Math. 2 (1952) 25-53.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1952.2.25Google Scholar
- P. Pedregal: Some remarks on quasiconvexity and rank-one convexity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 126A (1996) 1055-1065.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500023258Google Scholar
- P. Pedregal: Parametrized Measures and Variational Principles, Progress in Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel et al., 1997.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8886-8Google Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 1998. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.
