We study the relaxation of an integral functional involving argument deviations of the form I(u):=∫Ωf(x,u(g1(x)),…,u(gk(x))) dxI (u):= \int_{\Omega} f(x, u(g_1(x)), \ldots, u(g_k(x)))\, dx in the weak topology of a Lebesgue space Lp(Ω)L^p(\Omega), 1<p<+∞1 < p < +\infty, on an open bounded set Ω⊂Rn\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n. It is proven that, unlike the classical case without deviations, the relaxed functional in general cannot be obtained as convexification of the original one. However, we show that if the set functions gi ⁣:Ω→Ωg_i \colon \Omega \to \Omega satisfies a certain condition (called unifiability), which is just a natural extension of nonergodicity property of a single function to sets of functions, and which is automatically satisfied when k=1k = 1, then the relaxed functional is equal to the convexification of the original one. We show that the unifiability requirement is essential for such a convexification result for a generic integrand. Further slightly restricting this condition, we also obtain the nice representation of the relaxed functional in terms of convexification of some new integrand, but involving in general countably many new argument deviations

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Eugene Stepanov

Computer Technology Department, St. Petersburg Institute of Fine Mechanics and Optics, 14 Sablinskaya ul., 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia

Andrei Zdorovtsev

Computer Technology Department, St. Petersburg Institute of Fine Mechanics and Optics, 14 Sablinskaya ul., 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia

  1. N. V. Azbelev, V. P. Maksimov, L. F. Rakhmatullina: Introduction to the Theory of Functional Differential Equations, Nauka, Moscow (1991) (Russian); English transl. of the 1st part: Introduction to the Theory of Linear Functional Differential Equations, World Federation Publishers (1996).Google Scholar
  2. J.-M. Bismut: Intégrales convexes et probabilités, J. Math. Anal. and Appl. 42 (1973) 639–673.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(73)90170-4Google Scholar
  3. G. Buttazzo: Semicontinuity, relaxation and integral representation in the calculus of variations, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics 207, Longman Scientific, Harlow (1989).Google Scholar
  4. G. Buttazzo, M. E. Drakhlin, L. Freddi, E. Stepanov: Homogenization of optimal control problems for functional differential equations with deviating argument, J. Optimization Theory and Appl. 93 (1997) 103–119.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022649817825Google Scholar
  5. C. Castaing, M. Valadier: Convex Analysis and Measurable Multifunctions, Lecture Notes Math. 580, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1977).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0087685Google Scholar
  6. A. V. Chistyakov: A pathological counterexample for hypothesis on non-Fredholm property in algebras of weighted shift operators, Izvestiya VUZ, Matematika 39 (1995) 76–86 (Russian); English transl.: Russian Mathematics 39, no. 10 (1995) 73–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(94)00202-FGoogle Scholar
  7. D. L. Cohn: Measure Theory, Birkhäuser, Boston (1980).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0399-0Google Scholar
  8. J. Diestel, L. Uhl: Vector Measures, American Math. Soc., Providence, R. I. (1968).Google Scholar
  9. M. E. Drakhlin: On one linear functional equation, in: Functional Differential Equations, Perm Polytechnical Institute, Perm (1985) 91–111 (Russian).Google Scholar
  10. M. E. Drakhlin: An inner superposition operator in spaces of summable functions, Izvestiya VUZ, Matematika 30 (1986) 18–24 (Russian).Google Scholar
  11. M. E. Drakhlin, E. Litsyn, E. Stepanov: Variational methods for a class of nonlocal functionals, Computers and Math. with Appl. 37 (1999) 79–100.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00061-9Google Scholar
  12. I. Ekeland, R. Temam: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, Studies in Mathematics and its Applications 1, North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam et al. (1976).Google Scholar
  13. I. I. Gikhman, A. V. Skorokhod: The Theory of Stochastic Processes, “Nauka”, Moscow (1975) (Russian); English transl.: Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1980).Google Scholar
  14. R. P. Halmos: Measure Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1974).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9976-0Google Scholar
  15. N. J. Kalton: Isomorphisms between Lp -function spaces when p < 1, J. Funct. Anal. 42 (1981) 299–337.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(81)90092-6Google Scholar
  16. I. V. Shragin: Abstract Nemyckiǐ operators are locally defined operators, Soviet Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math., 227 (1976) 47–49 (Russian); English transl.: Soviet Math. Doklady 17 (1976) 354–357.https://doi.org/10.1086/201748Google Scholar

E. Stepanov, A. Zdorovtsev. “Relaxation of Some Nonlocal Integral Functionals in Weak Topology of Lebesgue Spaces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 8 (2001), No. 2, 447–469. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca08024