We consider a rate independent evolution variational inequality with an arbitrary convex closed constraint Z in a Hilbert space X. The main results consist in proving that it is well-posed in the Young integral setting in the space of functions of essentially bounded variation for every Z and in the space of regulated functions provided 0 lies in the interior of Z.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Pavel Krejčí

Mathematical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Žitná 25, 11567 Praha 1, Czech Republic

krejci@math.cas.cz

Philippe Laurençot

Mathématiques pour l'Industrie et la Physique, UMR CNRS 5640, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France

laurencot@mip.ups-tlse.fr
  1. G. Aumann: Reelle Funktionen (German), Springer-Verlag, Berlin et al. (1954).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-42636-4Google Scholar
  2. H. Brézis: Opérateurs Maximaux Monotones, North-Holland Math. Studies, Amsterdam (1973).Google Scholar
  3. V. Barbu, T. Precupanu: Convexity and Optimization in Banach Spaces, 2nd ed., D. Reidel (ed.), Dordrecht et al. (1986).Google Scholar
  4. M. Brokate, J. Sprekels: Hysteresis and Phase Transitions, Appl. Math. Sci. 121, Springer-Verlag, New York (1996).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4048-8Google Scholar
  5. P. Drábek, P. Krejčí, P. Takáč: Nonlinear Differential Equations, Research Notes in Mathematics 404, Chapman & Hall/CRC, London (1999).Google Scholar
  6. L. C. Evans, R. F. Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, CRC Press, Boca Raton (1992).Google Scholar
  7. D. Fraňková: Regulated functions, Math. Bohem. 119 (1991) 20–59.https://doi.org/10.21136/MB.1991.126195Google Scholar
  8. T. H. Hildebrandt: Introduction to the Theory of Integration, Academic Press, New York and London (1963).Google Scholar
  9. A. N. Kolmogorov, S. V. Fomin: Introductory Real Analysis, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1970).Google Scholar
  10. M. A. Krasnosel’skii, A. V. Pokrovskii: Systems with Hysteresis, Nauka, Moscow (1983) (English edition Springer-Verlag 1989).Google Scholar
  11. P. Krejčí: Vector hysteresis models, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 2 (1991) 281–292.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792500000541Google Scholar
  12. P. Krejčí: Hysteresis, convexity and dissipation in hyperbolic equations, Gakuto Int. Ser. Math. Sci. Appl. 8, Gakkōtosho, Tokyo (1996).Google Scholar
  13. P. Krejčí, J. Kurzweil: A nonexistence result for the Kurzweil integral, Math. Bohem., to appear.Google Scholar
  14. J. Kurzweil: Generalized ordinary differential equations and continuous dependence on a parameter, Czechoslovak Math. J. 7(82) (1957) 418–449.https://doi.org/10.21136/CMJ.1957.100258Google Scholar
  15. M. D. P. Monteiro Marques: Differential Inclusions in Nonsmooth Mechanical Problems. Shocks and Dry Friction, Birkhäuser, Basel (1993).Google Scholar
  16. J.-J. Moreau: Evolution problem associated with a moving convex set in a Hilbert space, J. Diff. Eq. 26 (1977) 347–374.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(77)90085-7Google Scholar
  17. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press (1970).https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873173Google Scholar
  18. Š. Schwabik: On the relation between Young’s and Kurzweil’s concept of Stieltjes integral, Časopis Pěst. Mat. 98 (1973) 237–251.https://doi.org/10.21136/CPM.1973.117805Google Scholar
  19. Š. Schwabik: Abstract Perron-Stieltjes integral, Math. Bohem. 121 (1996) 425–447.https://doi.org/10.21136/MB.1996.126036Google Scholar
  20. Š. Schwabik, M. Tvrdý, O. Vejvoda: Differential and Integral Equations: Boundary Value Problems and Adjoints, Academia and D. Reidel, Praha (1979).Google Scholar
  21. M. Tvrdý: Regulated functions and the Perron-Stieltjes integral, Časopis Pěst. Mat. 114 (1989) 187–209.https://doi.org/10.21136/CPM.1989.108713Google Scholar
  22. A. Visintin: Differential Models of Hysteresis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin et al. (1994).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11557-2Google Scholar

P. Krejčí, P. Laurençot. “Generalized Variational Inequalities.” Journal of Convex Analysis 9 (2002), No. 1, 159–183. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca09008