Let F:S(m)→R‾F:\mathbf{S}(m)\rightarrow\overline{\mathbb{R}} be a spectral function (i.e. S(m)\mathbf{S}(m) is the space of m×mm\times m real symmetric matrices, ∀O∈O(m),∀X∈S(m), F(OXtO)=F(X)\forall O\in\mathbf{O}(m),\forall X\in\mathbf{S}(m),\ F(OX{^tO})=F(X), where O(m)\mathbf{O}(m) is the orthogonal group and tO{^tO} is the transpose of OO). We associate to it the symmetric function sF:Rm→R‾s_F:\mathbb{R}^m\rightarrow\overline{\mathbb{R}} by restricting it to the subspace of diagonal matrices. In this work, on the one hand, we give a new, natural proof of the formula which binds the Fréchet subgradients of a spectral function FF and the Fréchet subgradients of the function sFs_F (identical formulas follow for the subgradients and the horizon subgradients); on the other hand we deduce from the previous results and from convexity arguments that, in the general case, a similar formula holds for the Clarke subgradients.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. H. Baumgärtel: Analytic Perturbation Theory for Matrices and Operators, Birkhäuser (1985).https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112721810Google Scholar
  2. R. Bhatia: Matrix Analysis, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 169, Springer, Berlin (1996).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0653-8Google Scholar
  3. J. M. Borwein, A. S. Lewis: Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization, Theory and Examples, CMS Books in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin (2000).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9859-3Google Scholar
  4. F. H. Clarke: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, Wiley, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  5. S. Friedland: Convex spectral functions, Linear and Multilinear Algebra 9 (1981) 299–316.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081088108817381Google Scholar
  6. T. Kato: Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Springer, Berlin (1966).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53393-8Google Scholar
  7. T. Kato: A Short Introduction to Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Springer, Berlin (1982).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5700-4Google Scholar
  8. J.-B. Hiriart–Urruty, A. S. Lewis: The Clarke and Michel–Penot subdifferentials of the eigenvalues of a symmetric matrix, Comput. Optim. Appl. 13(1–3) (1999) 13–23.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008644520093Google Scholar
  9. J.-B. Hiriart–Urruty, M. Torki: Analyse de la sensibilité du second ordre de toutes les valeurs propres d’une matrice symétrique, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. I, Math. 324 (1997) 1071–1074.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4442(97)87888-3Google Scholar
  10. J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty, D. Ye: Analyse de la sensibilité du premier ordre de toutes les valeurs propres d’une matrice symétrique, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. I, Math. 318 (1994) 177–182.Google Scholar
  11. J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty, D. Ye: Sensitivity analysis of all eigenvalues of a symmetric matrix, Numer. Math. 70 (1995) 45–72.https://doi.org/10.1007/s002110050109Google Scholar
  12. A. S. Lewis: Convex analysis on the Hermitian matrices, SIAM J. Optim. 6 (1996) 164–177.https://doi.org/10.1137/0806009Google Scholar
  13. A. S. Lewis: Derivatives of spectral functions, Math. Oper. Res. 21 (1996) 576–588.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.21.3.576Google Scholar
  14. A. S. Lewis: Nonsmooth analysis of eigenvalues, Math. Programming 84 (1999) 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107980004aGoogle Scholar
  15. A. S. Lewis, M. L. Overton: Eigenvalue optimization, Acta Numer. 5 (1996) 149–190.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492900002646Google Scholar
  16. A. S. Lewis, H. S. Sendov: Twice differentiable spectral functions, To appear.Google Scholar
  17. J. E. Martínez-Legaz: On convex and quasiconvex spectral functions, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Catalan Days on Applied Mathematics, Presses Universitaires de Perpignan (1995).Google Scholar
  18. M. L. Overton, R. S. Womersley: Optimality conditions and duality theory for minimizing sums of the largest eigenvalues of symmetric matrices, Math. Programming 62 (1993) 321–357.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585173Google Scholar
  19. F. Rellich: Perturbation Theory of Eigenvalue Problems, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  20. R. T. Rockafellar: Proximal subgradients, marginal values, and augmented Lagrangians in nonconvex optimization, Math. Oper. Res. 6 (1981) 424–436.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.6.3.424Google Scholar
  21. R. T. Rockafellar, R. J.-B. Wets: Variational Analysis, Springer, Berlin (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3Google Scholar
  22. A. Seeger: Convex analysis of spectrally defined matrix functions, SIAM J. Optim. 7 (1997) 679–696.https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623495288866Google Scholar
  23. M. Torki: Second-order directional derivatives of all eigenvalues of a symmetric matrix, Nonlinear Anal. 46 (2001) 1133–1150.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(00)00165-6Google Scholar
  24. M. Torki: First- and second-order epi-differentiability in eigenvalue optimization, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 234 (1999) 391–416.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6320Google Scholar
  25. M. Torki: Second-order epi-differentiability and subdifferentiability of spectral convex functions, to appear.Google Scholar
  26. N.-K. Tsing, M. K. H. Fan, E. I. Verriest: On analycity of functions involving eigenvalues, Linear Algebra Appl. 207 (1994) 159–180.https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(94)90009-4Google Scholar

M. Ciligot-Travain, S. Traoré. “On Subgradients of Spectral Functions.” Journal of Convex Analysis 9 (2002), No. 2, 401–414. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca09023