Recently pseudomonotone variational inequalities have been studied quite extensively, hereby extending the theory of pseudoconvex minimization problems. The focus of the present work are "pseudoaffine maps", i.e., pseudomonotone maps T for which -T is also pseudomonotone. A particular case of such maps are the gradients of pseudolinear functions. Our main goal is to derive the general form of pseudoaffine maps which are defined on the whole space.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Monica Bianchi

Istituto di Econometria e Matematica per le Decisioni Economiche, Università
Cattolica, Via Necchi 9, 20123 Milano, Italy

mbianchi@mi.unicatt.it

Nicolas Hadjisavvas

Dept. of Product and Systems Design, University of the Aegean, 84100 Hermoupolis, Syros, Greece

nhad@aegean.gr

Siegfried Schaible

A. G. Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0203,
U.S.A.

siegfried.schaible@ucr.edu
  1. Q. H. Ansari, S. Schaible, J. C. Yao: Eta-pseudolinearity, Riv. Mat. Sci. Econom. Soc. 22 (1999) 31–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912349Google Scholar
  2. M. Avriel, W. E. Diewert, S. Schaible, I. Zang: Generalized Concavity, Plenum Publ. Corp., New York (1988).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7600-2Google Scholar
  3. R. Baer: Linear Algebra and Projective Geometry, Academic Press, New York (1952).Google Scholar
  4. M. Bianchi, S. Schaible: An extension of pseudolinear functions and variational inequality problems, J. Optim. Th. Appl. 104 (2000) 59–71.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004672604998Google Scholar
  5. K. L. Chew, E. U. Choo: Pseudolinearity and efficiency, Math. Programming 28 (1984) 226–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02612363Google Scholar
  6. B. D. Craven: Fractional Programming, Heldermann Verlag, Berlin (1988).Google Scholar
  7. J. Dugundji, A. Granas: Fixed Point Theory, Vol. 1, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw (1982).Google Scholar
  8. V. Jeyakumar, X. Q. Yang: On characterizing the solution sets of pseudolinear programs, J. Optim. Th. Appl. 87 (1995) 747–755.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192142Google Scholar
  9. S. Karamardian: Complementarity over cones with monotone and pseudomonotone maps, J. Optim. Th. Appl. 18 (1976) 445–454.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932654Google Scholar
  10. S. Komlósi: First and second order characterizations of pseudolinear functions, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 67 (1993) 278–286.https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90069-YGoogle Scholar
  11. K. O. Kortanek, J. P. Evans: Pseudoconcave programming and Lagrange regularity, Oper. Res. 15 (1967) 882–892.https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.15.5.882Google Scholar
  12. J. E. Martínez-Legaz: Quasiconvex duality theory by generalized conjugation methods, Optimization 19 (1988) 603–652.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331938808843379Google Scholar
  13. B. Martos: Nonlinear Programming, Theory and Methods, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1975).Google Scholar
  14. T. Rapcsák: On pseudolinear functions, Europ. J. Oper. Res. 50 (1991) 353–360.https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90267-YGoogle Scholar
  15. W. A. Thompson, D. W. Parke: Some properties of generalized concave functions, Oper. Res. 21 (1973) 305–313.https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.21.1.305Google Scholar
  16. H. Tuy: Sur les fonctions presque affines, Coll. Math. 22 (1971) 301–309.https://doi.org/10.4064/cm-22-2-301-309Google Scholar

M. Bianchi, N. Hadjisavvas, S. Schaible. “On Pseudomonotone Maps T for which -T is also Pseudomonotone.” Journal of Convex Analysis 10 (2003), No. 1, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca1007