We prove an integral representation formula for the relaxed functional of a scalar non parametric integral of the Calculus of Variations. Similar results are known to be true under the key assumption that the integrand is coercive in the gradient variable. Here we show that the same integral representation holds for a wide class of non coercive integrands, including for example the strictly convex ones.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Francesco Maggi

Dip. di Matematica, Università di Firenze, Viale Morgagni 67/A, 50134 Firenze, Italy

maggi@math.unifi.it
  1. G. Anzellotti, G. Buttazzo, G. Dal Maso: Dirichlet problem for demi-coercive functionals, Nonlinear Anal. 10 (1986) 603–613.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(86)90145-8Google Scholar
  2. J. P. Aubin, H. Frankowska: Set Valued Analysis, Birkhäuser, Basel (1990).Google Scholar
  3. G. Bouchitté, G. Dal Maso: Integral representation and relaxation of convex local functionals on BV (Ω), Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci., IV. Ser. 20(4) (1993) 483–533.Google Scholar
  4. A. Braides, V. De Cicco: New lower semicontinuity and relaxation results for functionals defined on BV (Ω), Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 6 (1996) 1–30.Google Scholar
  5. G. Buttazzo: Semicontinuity, Relaxation and Integral Representation in the Calculus of Variations, Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser. 207, Longman, Harlow (1989).Google Scholar
  6. G. Dal Maso: Integral representation on BV (Ω) of Γ-limits of variational integrals, Manuscripta Math. 30 (1980) 387–416.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301259Google Scholar
  7. V. De Cicco: A lower semicontinuity result for functionals defined on BV (Ω), Ricerche Mat. 39 (1990) 293–325.Google Scholar
  8. V. De Cicco: Lower semicontinuity for certain integral functionals on BV (Ω), Bull. Un. Mat. Ital. 5-B (1991) 291–313.Google Scholar
  9. F. Ferro: Integral characterization of functionals defined on spaces of BV functions, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 61 (1979) 177–201.Google Scholar
  10. I. Fonseca, S. Müller: Relaxation of quasiconvex functionals in BV (Ω, Rp) for integrands f (x, u, ∇u), Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 123 (1993) 1–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386367Google Scholar
  11. I. Fonseca, G. Leoni: On lower semicontinuity and relaxation, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 131A (2001) 519–565.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210501000245Google Scholar
  12. M. Giaquinta, G. Modica, J. Souček: Functionals with linear growth in the calculus of variations. I., Comm. Math. Univ. Carolinae 20 (1979) 143–156.Google Scholar
  13. C. Goffman, J. Serrin: Sublinear functions of measures and variational integrals, Duke Math. J. 31 (1964) 159–178.https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-64-03115-1Google Scholar
  14. M. Gori, F. Maggi: The common root of the geometric conditions in Serrin lower semicontinuity theorem, preprint.Google Scholar
  15. M. Gori, F. Maggi, P. Marcellini: On some sharp lower semicontinuity condition in L1, Preprint Univ. di Firenze (2002).Google Scholar
  16. C. B. Morrey Jr.: Multiple Integrals in the Calculus of Variations, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 130, Springer-Verlag, New York (1966).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69952-1Google Scholar
  17. Yu. G. Reshetnyak: Weak convergence of completely additive vector functions on a set, Siberian Math. J. 9 (1968) 1039–1045.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196453Google Scholar
  18. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton Mathematical Series 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1970).Google Scholar
  19. J. Serrin: On the definition and properties of certain variational integrals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1961) 139–167.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1961-0138018-9Google Scholar

F. Maggi. “On the Relaxation on BV of Certain Non Coercive Integral Functionals.” Journal of Convex Analysis 10 (2003), No. 2, 477–489. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca1029