We study the Walras equilibrium price function of a linear exchange economy. We show that it is locally Lipschitz with respect to utility functions and initial endowments on the relative interior of the set of parameters where the price is unique. We also prove that it is never locally Lipschitz on the boundary. This extend previous result of J. M. Bonnisseau, M. Florig and A. Jofré [J. Optimization Theory Applications 109 (2001) 237–263, 264–288].

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Jean-Marc Bonnisseau

CERMSEM, Université de Paris 1, 106-112 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75647 Paris Cedex 13, France

jmbonni@univ-paris1.fr

Michael Florig

CERMSEM, Université de Paris 1, 106-112 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75647 Paris Cedex 13, France

florig@univ-paris1.fr
  1. J. M. Bonnisseau, M. Florig: Existence and optimality of oligopoly equilibria in linear exchange economies, Econ. Theory 22 (2003) 727–741.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-003-0363-6Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Bonnisseau, M. Florig, A. Jofré: Continuity and uniqueness of equilibria for linear exchange economies, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 109(2) (2001) 237–263.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017517020329Google Scholar
  3. J. M. Bonnisseau, M. Florig, A. Jofré: Differentiability of equilibria for linear exchange economies, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 109(2) (2001) 264–288.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017558204399Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Bottazzi: Accessibility of Pareto optima by Walrasian exchange processes, J. Math. Econ. 23 (1994) 585–603.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(94)90014-0Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Bottazzi, B. de Meyer: A market game for assets and taxed investors, J. Math. Econ. 39 (2003) 657–675.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4068(03)00019-3Google Scholar
  6. P. Champsaur, B. Cornet: Walrasian exchange processes, in: Economic Decision-Making: Games, Econometrics and Optimization, J. J. Gabszewicz, J. F. Richard, L. A. Wolsey (eds.), Elsevier (1990) 3–13.Google Scholar
  7. B. Cornet: Linear Exchange Economies, Cahier Eco-Math, CERMSEM, Université de Paris 1 (1989).Google Scholar
  8. B. C. Eaves: A finite algorithm for the linear exchange model, J. Math. Econ. 3 (1976) 197–203.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(76)90028-8Google Scholar
  9. M. Florenzano, E. Moreno-Garcia: Linear exchange economies with a continuum of agents, Spanish Economic Review 3 (2001) 253–272.https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011446Google Scholar
  10. M. Florig: Arbitrary small indivisibilities, Econ. Theory 22 (2003) 831–843.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-002-0347-yGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Florig: Equilibrium correspondence of linear exchange economies, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 120(1) (2004) 97–109.https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000012734.59679.9aGoogle Scholar
  12. J. J. Gabszewicz, P. Michel: Oligopoly equilibria in exchange economies, in: Trade, Technology and Economics. Essays in Honour of Richard G. Lipsey, B. C. Eaton, R. G. Harris (eds.), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1997) 217–240.https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035335046.00023Google Scholar
  13. D. Gale: Price equilibrium for linear models of exchange, Technical Report P-1156, The Rand Corporation (1957).Google Scholar
  14. D. Gale: The Theory of Linear Economic Models, Academic Press (1960).Google Scholar
  15. D. Gale: The linear exchange model, J. Math. Econ. 3 (1976) 205–209.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(76)90029-XGoogle Scholar
  16. J. F. Mertens: The limit-price mechanism, J. Math. Econ. 39 (2003) 433–528.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4068(03)00015-6Google Scholar
  17. R. S. Varga: Matrix Iterative Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood (1962).Google Scholar

J.-M. Bonnisseau, M. Florig. “Boundary Behaviour of Equilibria for Linear Exchange Economies.” Journal of Convex Analysis 12 (2005), No. 2, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca12032