Using ideas from Compensated Compactness, we derive a necessary condition for any fourth degree polynomial on Rp\mathbb{R}^{p} to be sequentially lower semicontinuous with respect to weakly convergent fields defined on RN\mathbb{R}^N. We use that result to derive a necessary condition for the quasiconvexity of fourth degree polynomials of m×Nm\times N gradient matrices of vector fields defined on RN\mathbb{R}^N. This condition is violated by the example given by Šverák for m≥3m\geq 3 and N≥2N\geq 2, of a fourth degree polynomial which is rank-one convex, but it is not quasiconvex. These classes of functions are used in the approach to Nonlinear Elasticity based on the Calculus of Variations.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. J. J. Alibert, B. Dacorogna: An example of a quasiconvex function not polyconvex in dimension two, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 117 (1992) 155–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00387763Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Ball: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 63 (1978) 337–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279992Google Scholar
  3. B. Dacorogna: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, Springer, Berlin (1989).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51440-1Google Scholar
  4. B. Dacorogna, P. Marcellini: A counterexample in the vectorial calculus of variations, in: Material Instabilities in Continuum Mechanics, J. M. Ball (ed.), Oxford Science Public., Oxford (1988) 77–83.Google Scholar
  5. J. Kristensen: On the non-locality of quasiconvexity, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 16 (1999) 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0294-1449(99)80006-7Google Scholar
  6. C. B. Morrey: Multiple Integrals in the Calculus of Variations, Springer, Berlin (1966).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69952-1Google Scholar
  7. S. Müller: Rank-one convexity implies quasiconvexity on diagonal matrices, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 20 (1999) 1087–1095.https://doi.org/10.1155/S1073792899000598Google Scholar
  8. F. Murat: Compacité par compensation: Condition nécessaire et suffisante de continuité faible sous une hypothèse de rang constant, Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa, Cl. Sci., IV. Ser. 8 (1981) 69–102.Google Scholar
  9. F. Murat, L. Tartar: Calculus of variations and homogenization, Collection d’Etudes de Electricité de France (1983), reprinted in: Topics in the Mathematical Modelling of Composite Materials, A. Cherkaev, R. Kohn (eds.), Birkhäuser (1997) 139–173.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2032-9_6Google Scholar
  10. P. Pedregal: Some remarks on quasiconvexity and rank-one convexity, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 126 (1996) 1055–1065.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500023258Google Scholar
  11. V. Šverák: Rank-one convexity does not imply quasiconvexity, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 120 (1992) 185–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500015080Google Scholar
  12. L. Tartar: Compensated compactness and applications to partial differential equations, in: Nonlineal Analysis and Mechanics: Heriot-Watt Symp., Vol. 4, R. J. Knops (ed.), Res. Notes Math. 39, Pitman, London (1979) 136–212.Google Scholar
  13. L. Tartar: Homogenization, Compensated Compactness and H-measures, Lecture Notes CBMS-NSF Conference, Santa Cruz, California (1993).Google Scholar

S. Gutiérrez. “A Necessary Condition for the Quasiconvexity of Polynomials of Degree Four.” Journal of Convex Analysis 13 (2006), No. 1, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca13004