We show that if KK is a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space HH, ee is a non-zero arbitrary vector in HH and for each t∈Rt\in \mathbb{R}, z(t)z(t) is the closest point in K+teK + te to the origin, then the angle z(t)z(t) makes with ee is a decreasing function of tt while z(t)≠0z(t)\neq 0, and the inner product of z(t)z(t) with ee is increasing.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Renu Choudhary

Dept. of Mathematics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

renu@math.auckland.ac.nz
  1. H. Benabdellah: Existence of solutions to the nonconvex sweeping process, J. Differ. Equations 164 (2000) 286–295.https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1999.3756Google Scholar
  2. R. Choudhary, Generic convergence of a convex Lyapounov function along trajectories of nonexpansive semigroups in Hilbert space, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 7(2) (2006) 245–268.Google Scholar
  3. G. Colombo, V. V. Goncharov: The sweeping process without convexity, Set-Valued Anal. 7 (1999) 357–374.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008774529556Google Scholar
  4. P. Daniele, A. Maugeri: On dynamical equilibrium problems and variational inequalities, in: Equilibrium Problems: Nonsmooth Optimization and Variational Inequality Methods, F. Giannessi et al. (ed.), Nonconvex Optim. Appl. 58, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001) 59–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48026-3_5Google Scholar
  5. P. Daniele, A. Maugeri, W. Oettli: Time-dependent traffic equilibria, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 103(3) (1999) 543–555.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021779823196Google Scholar
  6. A. L. Dontchev, T. Zolezzi: Well-Posed Optimization Problems, Springer, Berlin (1993).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0084195Google Scholar
  7. S. Fitzpatrick, R. R. Phelps: Differentiability of the metric projection in Hilbert space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 270(2) (1982) 483–501.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1982-0645326-5Google Scholar
  8. J. Gwinner: Time dependent variational inequalities - some recent trends, in: Equilibrium Problems and Variational Models (Erice, 2000), P. Daniele et al. (ed.), Nonconvex Optim. Appl. 68, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2003) 225–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0239-1_12Google Scholar
  9. F. Mignot: Contrôle dans les inéquations variationelles elliptiques, J. Funct. Anal. 22(2) (1976) 130–185.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(76)90017-3Google Scholar
  10. J. J. Moreau: Evolution problem associated with a moving convex set in a Hilbert space, J. Differ. Equations 26 (1977) 347–374.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(77)90085-7Google Scholar
  11. J. J. Moreau: Numerical aspects of the sweeping process, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 177(3-4) (1999) 329–349.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00387-9Google Scholar
  12. R. R. Phelps: Convex sets and nearest points I, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1957) 790–797.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1957-0087897-7Google Scholar
  13. L. Thibault: Sweeping process with regular and nonregular sets, J. Differ. Equations 193 (2003) 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0396(03)00129-3Google Scholar
  14. E. H. Zarantonello: Projections on convex sets in Hilbert space and spectral theory, in: Contribution to Nonlinear Functional Analysis, E. H. Zarantonello (ed.), Academic Press, New York (1971) 237–424.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-775850-3.50013-3Google Scholar

R. Choudhary. “Direction of Movement of the Element of Minimal Norm in a Moving Convex Set.” Journal of Convex Analysis 14 (2007), No. 3, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca14029