Let FF be a closed set of the Euclidean space Ed\Bbb{E}^d, with ∅≠F≠Ed\emptyset\not=F\not=\Bbb{E}^d and d≥2d\geq 2. Let N\mathcal{N} be the set of centers of all open balls contained in Ed∖F\Bbb{E}^d \setminus F which are maximal with respect to inclusion. We prove that the Hausdorff dimension dimH(N)\mathrm{dim_H}(\mathcal{N}) of N\mathcal{N} equals dd when FF is, in the sense of Baire categories, a generic compact subset of Ed\mathbb{E}^d, or when Ed∖F\Bbb{E}^d \setminus F is the interior of a generic convex body of Ed\mathbb{E}^d. If CC is a generic convex body, we deduce that the set of all points of ∂C\partial C where the ``upper curvature'' of ∂C\partial C is positive and finite, is of Hausdorff dimension d−1d-1. Let CurvCt\mathrm{CurvCt} be the set of centers of upper curvature of ∂C\partial C, and ω\omega be any non empty open subset of Ed\Bbb{E}^d. We also prove that dimH(ω∩CurvCt)=d\dimH(\omega\cap \mathrm{CurvCt})=d. Let BB be a generic compact subset of Ed\mathbb{E}^d, or a generic convex body of Ed\mathbb{E}^d. Let aN\aN be the set of centers of all closed balls containing BB which are minimal with respect to inclusion. We also prove that dimH(aN)=d\mathrm{dim_H}(\aN)=d. The proofs employ some of the ideas used in a previous paper of the author [``Dimension de Hausdorff de la nervure'', Geom. Dedicata, 85 (2001) 217–235] to construct large cut loci in Ed\mathbb{E}^d.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Alain Rivière

Lab. Amiénois de Mathématiques Fondamentales et Appliquées, CNRS, UMR 6140, Faculté de Mathématiques et Informatique d'Amiens, 33 rue Saint-Leu, 80 039 Amiens, France

alain.riviere@u-picardie.fr
  1. A. D. Aleksandrov: Almost everywhere existence of the second differential of a convex function and some properties of convex surfaces connected with it, Uchen. Zap. Leningrad. Gos. Univ. Math. Ser. 6 (1939) 3–35 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. M. Berger: A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry, Springer, Berlin (2003).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18245-7Google Scholar
  3. F. Chazal, R. Soufflet: Stability and finiteness properties of medial axis and skeleton, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 2 (2004) 149–170.https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JODS.0000024119.38784.ffGoogle Scholar
  4. H. I. Choy, S. W. Choy, H. P. Moon: Mathematical theory of medial axis transform, Pacific J. Math. 1 (1997) 57–88.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1997.181.57Google Scholar
  5. F. S. de Blasi, J. Myjak: Ambiguous loci of the farthest distance mapping from compact convex sets, Studia Math. 112(2) (1995) 99–107.https://doi.org/10.4064/sm-112-2-99-107Google Scholar
  6. F. S. de Blasi, N. V. Zhivkov: The number of nearest and farthest points to a compactum in Euclidean space, Israel J. Math. 130 (2002) 347–363.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764083Google Scholar
  7. P. Erdős: On the Hausdorff dimension of some sets in Euclidean space, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1946) 107–109.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1946-08514-6Google Scholar
  8. K. Falconer: Fractal Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1990).Google Scholar
  9. P. Gruber: Baire categories in convexity, in: Handbook of Convex Geometry. Volume B, P. M. Gruber, J. M. Wills (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam (1993) 1327–1346.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-89597-4.50021-4Google Scholar
  10. S. Hu, N. S. Papageorgiou: Handbook of Multivalued Analysis. Volume II: Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6359-4Google Scholar
  11. J. Itoh, M. Tanaka: The Lipschitz continuity of the distance function to the cut locus, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353(1) (2001) 21–40.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02564-2Google Scholar
  12. J. Itoh, T. Zamfirescu: On the length of the cut locus for finitely many points, Adv. Geom. 1 (2005) 97–106.https://doi.org/10.1515/advg.2005.5.1.97Google Scholar
  13. V. Klee: Some new results on smoothness and rotundity in normed linear spaces, Math. Ann. 139 (1959) 51–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01459822Google Scholar
  14. M. A. Martín, P. Mattila: k-dimensional regularity classifications for s-fractals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 305(1) (1988) 293–315.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1988-0920160-2Google Scholar
  15. G. Matheron: Examples of topological properties of skeletons (Chapter 11), and: On the negligibility of the skeleton and the absolute continuity of erosions (Chapter 12), in: Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Volume 2: Theoretical Advances, J. Serra (ed.), Academic Press, London (1988) 217–256.Google Scholar
  16. P. Mattila: Geometry of Sets and Measure in Euclidean Spaces, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623813Google Scholar
  17. A. Rivière: Classification des Points d’un Ouvert d’un Espace Euclidien Relativement à la Distance au Bord, Etude Topologique et Quantitative des Classes Obtenues, Thèse, Université de Paris Sud, Paris (1987).Google Scholar
  18. A. Rivière: Nervure d’un ouvert d’un espace euclidien, J. Sci. Islam. Repub. Iran, Sect. A: Mathematics 1 (1996) 1–24.Google Scholar
  19. A. Rivière: Dimension de Hausdorff de la nervure, Geom. Dedicata 85 (2001) 217–235.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010310524706Google Scholar
  20. A. Rivière: Hausdorff dimension of cut loci of convex C2 Jordan curves, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 51 (2006) 95–110.Google Scholar
  21. R. T. Rockafellar, R. J.-B. Wets: Variational Analysis, Springer, Berlin (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3Google Scholar
  22. C. A. Rogers: Hausdorff Measures, Cambridge University Press, London (1970).Google Scholar
  23. M. Schmitt, J. Mattioli: Morphologie mathématique, Technical Report, Laboratoire Central de Recherches de Thomson-CSF, Orsay (February 1992).Google Scholar
  24. R. Schneider, J. A. Wieacker: Approximation of convex bodies by polytopes, Bull. London Math. Soc. 13 (1981) 149–156.https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/13.2.149Google Scholar
  25. R. Schneider: Convex surfaces, curvature and surface area measures, in: Handbook of Convex Geometry. Volume A, P. M. Gruber, J. M. Wills (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam (1993) 273–299.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-89596-7.50013-4Google Scholar
  26. K. Shiohama, M. Tanaka: Cut loci and distance spheres on Alexandrov surfaces, in: Actes de la Table Ronde de Géométrie Différentielle (Luminy, 1992), A. L. Besse (ed.), Société Mathématique de France, Paris (1996) 531–559.Google Scholar
  27. U. Westphal, T. Schwartz: Farthest points and monotone operators, Bull. Austr. Math. Soc. 58(1) (1998) 75–92.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700032019Google Scholar
  28. J. A. Wieacker: The convex hull of a typical compact set, Math. Ann. 282 (1988) 637–644.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01462889Google Scholar
  29. T. Zamfirescu: The curvature of most convex surfaces vanishes almost everywhere, Math. Z. 174 (1980) 135–139.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293533Google Scholar
  30. T. Zamfirescu: Nonexistence of curvature in most points of most convex surfaces, Math. Ann. 252 (1980) 217–219.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420084Google Scholar
  31. T. Zamfirescu: Curvature properties of typical convex surfaces, Pacific. J. Math. 131(1) (1988) 191–207.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1988.131.191Google Scholar
  32. T. Zamfirescu: The nearest point mapping is singled valued nearly everywhere, Arch. Math. 54 (1988) 563–566.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01188685Google Scholar
  33. T. Zamfirescu: Baire categories in convexity, Atti Semin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena 39 (1991) 139–164.Google Scholar
  34. T. Zamfirescu: On the cut locus in Alexandrov spaces and applications to convex surfaces, Pacific J. Math. 2 (2005) 375–386.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2004.217.375Google Scholar

A. Rivière. “Hausdorff Dimension of Cut Loci of Generic Subspaces of Euclidean Spaces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 14 (2007), No. 4, 823–854. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca14047