Given a bounded open set UU in Rd\real^d, the space of all continuous real functions on U‾\ov U which are harmonic on UU is denoted by H(U)H(U). Further, a lower bounded, Borel measurable numerical function ss on U‾\ov U is said to be H(U)H(U)-concave if ∫s dμ≤s(x)\int s\,d\mu\le s(x) for every x∈U‾x\in\ov U and every measure μ\mu on U‾\ov U satisfying ∫h dμ=h(x)\int h\,d\mu= h(x) for all h∈H(U)h\in H(U). It is shown that every H(U)H(U)-concave function is continuous on UU and, under additional assumptions on UU, several characterizations of H(U)H(U)-concave functions are given. For compact sets KK in Rd\real^d, continuity properties of H0(K)\hk-concave functions are studied, where H0(K)\hk is the space of all functions on KK which can be extended to be harmonic in some neighborhood of KK (depending on the given function). We prove that these functions are finely upper semicontinuous on the fine interior of KK, but not necessarily finely continuous there. Most of the results are established in the context of harmonic spaces, covering solutions of elliptic and parabolic second order partial differential equations. For example, it is shown that H(U)H(U)-concave functions are always continuous on UU if and only if the underlying harmonic space has the Brelot convergence property.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Ivan Netuka

Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Mathematical Institute, Sokolovská 86, 186 75 Praha 8, Czech Republic

netuka@karlin.mff.cuni.cz
  1. D. H. Armitage, S. J. Gardiner: Classical Potential Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, London (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0233-5Google Scholar
  2. H. Bauer: Šilovscher Rand und Dirichletsches Problem, Ann. Inst. Fourier 11 (1961) 89–136.https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.110Google Scholar
  3. L. Beznea, N. Boboc: Feyel’s techniques on the supermedian functionals and strongly supermedian functions, Potential Anal. 10(4) (1999) 347–372.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008643826822Google Scholar
  4. J. Bliedtner, W. Hansen: Simplicial cones in potential theory, Invent. Math. 29(2) (1975) 83–110.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390188Google Scholar
  5. J. Bliedtner, W. Hansen: Potential Theory. An Analytic and Probabilistic Approach to Balayage, Universitext, Springer, Berlin (1986).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71131-2Google Scholar
  6. M. Brelot: Axiomatique des fonctions harmoniques, Séminaire de Mathématiques Supérieures 14, Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal (1969).Google Scholar
  7. C. Constantinescu, A. Cornea: Potential Theory on Harmonic Spaces, Grundlehren der math. Wiss. 158, Springer, Berlin (1972).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65432-9Google Scholar
  8. C. Kuratowski: Topologie, Vol. II, Troisième Édition, Monografie Matematyczne 21, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw (1961).Google Scholar
  9. J. Lukeš, J. Malý, L. Zajíček: Fine Topology Methods in Real Analysis and Potential Theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1189, Springer, Berlin (1986).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0075894Google Scholar
  10. I. Netuka: Fine behaviour of solutions of the Dirichlet problem near an irregular point, Bull. Sci. Math., II. Sér. 114(1) (1990) 1–22.Google Scholar
  11. I. Netuka, J. Veselý: On harmonic functions (Solution of the problem 6393 [1982;502] proposed by G. A. Edgar), Amer. Math. Monthly 91 (1984) 61–62.https://doi.org/10.2307/2322182Google Scholar
  12. R. R. Phelps: Lectures on Choquet’s Theorem, Second Edition, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1757, Springer, Berlin (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/b76887Google Scholar
  13. W. Rudin: Real and Complex Analysis, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York (1987).Google Scholar

W. Hansen, I. Netuka. “Continuity Properties of Concave Functions in Potential Theory.” Journal of Convex Analysis 15 (2008), No. 1, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca15003