We are interested in new versions of Farkas lemmas for systems involving convex and DC-inequalities. These versions extend well-known Farkas-type results published recently, which were used as main tools in the study of convex optimization problems. The results are used to derive several strong duality results such as: Lagrange, Fenchel-Lagrange or Toland-Fenchel-Lagrange duality for DC and convex problems. Moreover, it is shown that for this class of problems, these versions of Farkas lemma are actually equivalent to several strong duality results of Lagrange, Fenchel-Lagrange or Toland-Fenchel-Lagrange types.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Nguyen Dinh

Department of Mathematics, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

ndinh@hcmiu.edu.vn

Guy Vallet

Laboratory of Applied Mathematics, University of Pau, BP 1155, 64013 Pau, France
and: UMR-CNRS 5142, Pau, France

guy.vallet@univ-pau.fr

T. T. A. Nghia

Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Pedagogy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

ttannghia@gmail.com
  1. L. T. H. An, P. D. Tao: The DC (difference of convex functions) programming and DCA revisited with DC models of real world non-convex optimization problems, Ann. Oper. Res. 133 (2005) 23–46.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-004-5022-1Google Scholar
  2. D. Azé: Eléments d’Analyse Convexe et Variationnelle, Ellipses, Paris (1997).Google Scholar
  3. R. I. Bot, G. Kassay, G. Wanka: Strong duality for generalized convex optimization problems, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 127 (2005) 45–70.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-005-6392-5Google Scholar
  4. R. I. Bot, G. Wanka: Farkas-type results with conjugate functions, SIAM J. Optim. 15 (2005) 540–554.https://doi.org/10.1137/030602332Google Scholar
  5. R. I. Bot, G. Wanka: An alternative formulation for a new closed cone constraint qualification, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 64A (2006) 1367–1381.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.06.041Google Scholar
  6. R. I. Bot, G. Wanka: Duality for multiobjective optimization problems with convex objective functions and DC constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 315 (2006) 526–543.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.06.067Google Scholar
  7. R. Burachik, V. Jeyakumar: Dual condition for the convex subdifferential sum formula with applications, J. Convex Analysis 12 (2005) 279–290.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca12020Google Scholar
  8. R. Burachik, V. Jeyakumar: A new geometric condition for Fenchel’s duality in infinite dimensional spaces. Math. Program. 104(B) (2005) 229–233.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-005-0614-3Google Scholar
  9. R. Burachik, V. Jeyakumar, Z.-Y. Wu: Necessary and sufficient conditions for stable conjugate duality, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 64A (2006) 1998–2006.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.07.034Google Scholar
  10. N. Dinh, M. A. Goberna, M. A. López: From linear to convex systems: consistency, Farkas’ lemma and applications, J. Convex Analysis 13 (2006) 113–133.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca13008Google Scholar
  11. N. Dinh, M. A. Goberna, M. A. López, T. Q. Son: New Farkas-type constraint qualifications in convex infinite programming, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., to appear.Google Scholar
  12. N. Dinh, V. Jeyakumar, G. M. Lee: Sequential lagrangian conditions for convex programs with applications to semidefinite programming, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 125 (2005) 85–112.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-004-1712-8Google Scholar
  13. N. Dinh, T. T. A. Nghia, G. Vallet: A closedness condition and its applications to DC programs with convex constraints, Preprint 0622, Laboratory of Applied Mathematics of Pau (2006).Google Scholar
  14. M. Dur: Conditions characterizing minima of the difference of functions, Monatsh. Math. 134 (2002) 295–303.https://doi.org/10.1007/s605-002-8264-4Google Scholar
  15. M. A. Goberna, V. Jeyakumar, N. Dinh: Dual characterizations of set containments with strict convex inequalities, J. Glob. Optim. 34 (2006) 33–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-005-3885-6Google Scholar
  16. J. Gwinner: Results of Farkas-type, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optimization 9 (1987) 471–520.https://doi.org/10.1080/01630568708816244Google Scholar
  17. J. B. Hiriart-Urruty: ε-Subdifferential, in: Convex Analysis and Optimization, J. P. Aubin, R. Vinter (eds.), Pitman, Boston (1982) 43–92.Google Scholar
  18. J. B. Hiriart-Urruty: From convex optimization to nonconvex optimization necessary and sufficient conditions for global optimality, in: From Convexity to Nonconvexity, R. P. Gilbert, P. D. Panagiotopoulos, P. M. Pardalos (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001) 219–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6019-4_13Google Scholar
  19. R. Horst, N. V. Thoai: DC programming: overview, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 103 (1999) 1–43.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021765131316Google Scholar
  20. V. Jeyakumar: Asymptotic dual conditions characterizing optimality for convex programs, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 93 (1997) 153–165.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022606002804Google Scholar
  21. V. Jeyakumar: Farkas’ lemma and extensions, in: Encyclopaedia of Optimization, Vol. 2, A. C. Floudas, P. M. Pardalos (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001) 87–91.Google Scholar
  22. V. Jeyakumar: Characterizing set containments involving infinite convex constraints and reverse convex constraints, SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2003) 947–959.https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623402401944Google Scholar
  23. V. Jeyakumar, N. Dinh, G. M. Lee: A new closed cone constraint qualification for convex optimization, Applied Mathematics Research Report AMR04/8, UNSW, Sydney (2004).Google Scholar
  24. V. Jeyakumar, G. M. Lee, N. Dinh: New sequential Lagrange multiplier conditions characterizing optimality without constraint qualifications for convex programs, SIAM J. Optim. 14(2) (2003) 534–547.https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623402417699Google Scholar
  25. V. Jeyakumar, A. M. Rubinov, B. M. Glover, Y. Ishizuka: Inequality systems and global optimization, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 202 (1996) 900–919.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1996.0353Google Scholar
  26. V. Jeyakumar, W. Song, N. Dinh, G. M. Lee: Stable strong duality in convex optimization, Applied Mathematics Research Report AMR05/22, UNSW, Sydney (2005).Google Scholar
  27. V. Jeyakumar, Z. Y. Wu, G. M. Lee, N. Dinh: Liberating the subgradient optimality conditions from constraint qualifications, J. Glob. Optim. 36 (2006) 127–137.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-006-9003-6Google Scholar
  28. M. Laghdir: Optimality conditions and Toland’s duality for a non-convex minimization problem, Mat. Vesn. 55 (2003) 21–30.Google Scholar
  29. M. A. López, J. E. Martinez-Legaz: Farkas-type theorems for positively homogeneous semi-infinite systems, Optimization 54(4-5) (2005) 421–431.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331930500100205Google Scholar
  30. J. E. Martinez-Legaz, M. Volle: Duality in D.C. programming: the case of several constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 237 (1999) 657–671.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6496Google Scholar
  31. V. N. Phat, J. Y. Park: Further generalizations of Farkas’ theorem and their applications in optimal control, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 216 (1997) 23–39.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1997.5612Google Scholar
  32. P. D. Tao, L. T. H. An: Convex analysis approach to d.c. programming: Theory, algorithms and applications, Acta Math. Vietnam 22 (1997) 289–355.Google Scholar
  33. J. F. Toland: Duality in nonconvex optimization, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 66 (1978) 399–415.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(78)90243-3Google Scholar
  34. H. Tuy: Convex Analysis and Global Optimization, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2809-5Google Scholar
  35. M. Volle: Duality principles for optimization problems dealing with the difference of vector-valued convex mappings, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 114 (2002) 223–241.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015424423727Google Scholar
  36. C. Zalinescu: Convex Analysis in General Vector Spaces, World Scientific, Singapore (2002).https://doi.org/10.1142/5021Google Scholar

N. Dinh, G. Vallet, T. T. A. Nghia. “Farkas-Type Results and Duality for DC Programs with Convex Constraints.” Journal of Convex Analysis 15 (2008), No. 2, 235–262. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca15017