We look for a simple general framework which would encompass the notion of symmetric self-dual spaces introduced by S. Simons and the notion of self-paired product space proposed recently by the author ["Monotonicities and dualities", in: Generalized Convexity and Related Topics, I. V. Konnor, D. T. Luc and A. M. Rubinov (eds), Lecture Notes in Economics and Math. Systems 583, Springer, Berlin (2007), 300-414]. Such a framework is appropriate for the study of a notion generalizing the concept of monotone operator. The representation of such operators by functions is the main purpose of the study.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Jean-Paul Penot

Lab. of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pau, BP 1155, 64013 Pau, France
and: UMR CNRS 5142, Pau, France

jean-paul.penot@univ-pau.fr
  1. H. H. Bauschke, D. A. MacLaren, H. S. Sendov: Fitzpatrick functions: inequalities, examples and remarks on a problem of Fitzpatrick, J. Convex Analysis 13 (2006) 499–523.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca13043Google Scholar
  2. J. Borwein: Maximal monotonicity via convex analysis, J. Convex Analysis 13 (2006) 561–586.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca13045Google Scholar
  3. J. Borwein: Maximality of sums of two maximal monotone operators in general Banach space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007) 3917–3934.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08960-5Google Scholar
  4. R. M. Bot, S. I. Grad, G. Wanka: Maximal monotonicity for the precomposition with a linear operator, SIAM J. Optim. 17 (2007) 1239–1252.https://doi.org/10.1137/050641491Google Scholar
  5. M. Buliga, G. de Saxcé, C. Vallée: Existence and construction of bipotentials for graphs of multivalued laws, J. Convex Analysis 15(1) (2008) 87–104.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca15007Google Scholar
  6. R. S. Burachik, S. Fitzpatrick: On a family of convex functions attached to a subdifferential operator, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 6 (2005) 165–172.Google Scholar
  7. R. S. Burachik, A. M. Rubinov: On abstract convexity and set-valued analysis, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 9(1) (2008) 105–123.Google Scholar
  8. R. S. Burachik, B. F. Svaiter: Maximal monotone operators, convex functions and a special family of enlargements, Set-Valued Anal. 10(4) (2002) 297–316.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020639314056Google Scholar
  9. R. S. Burachik, B. F. Svaiter: Maximal monotonicity, conjugation and the duality product, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131(8) (2003) 2379–2383.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07053-9Google Scholar
  10. S. Fitzpatrick: Representing monotone operators by convex functions, in: Functional Analysis and Optimization, Workshop / Miniconference (Canberra, 1988), Proc. Cent. Math. Anal. Aust. Natl. Univ. 20, Australian National University, Canberra (1988) 59–65.Google Scholar
  11. F. Flores-Bazán: On a notion of subdifferentiability for non-convex functions, Optimization 33 (1995) 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331939508844059Google Scholar
  12. F. Flores-Bazán, J. E. Martínez-Legaz: Simplified global optimality conditions in generalized conjugation theory, in: Generalized Convexity, Generalized Monotonicity: Recent Results, J.-P. Crouzeix, J. E. Martínez-Legaz, M. Volle (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998) 303–329.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3341-8_14Google Scholar
  13. E. Krauss: A representation of maximal monotone operators by saddle functions, Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl. 30 (1985) 823–836.Google Scholar
  14. E. Krauss: A representation of arbitrary maximal monotone operators via subgradients of skew-symmetric saddle functions, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 9 (1985) 1381–1399.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(85)90097-5Google Scholar
  15. E. Krauss: Maximal monotone operators and saddle functions. I., Z. Anal. Anwend. 5 (1986) 333–346.https://doi.org/10.4171/zaa/202Google Scholar
  16. J.-E. Martínez-Legaz: Fenchel duality and related properties in generalized conjugation theory, Southeast Asian Bull. Math. 19 (1995) 99–106.Google Scholar
  17. J.-E. Martínez-Legaz, I. Singer: Dualities between complete lattices, Optimization 21 (1990) 481–508.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331939008843573Google Scholar
  18. J.-E. Martínez-Legaz, B. F. Svaiter: Monotone operators representable by l.s.c. convex functions, Set-Valued Anal. 13(1) (2005) 21–46.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-004-4170-4Google Scholar
  19. J. E. Martinez-Legaz, M. Théra: A convex representation of maximal monotone operators, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2 (2001) 243–247.Google Scholar
  20. J.-J. Moreau: Inf-convolution, sous-additivité, convexité des fonctions numériques, J. Math. Pures Appl. 49 (1970) 109–154.Google Scholar
  21. D. Pallaschke, S. Rolewicz: Foundations of Mathematical Optimization: Convex Analysis Without Linearity, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1588-1Google Scholar
  22. J.-P. Penot: Rotundity, smoothness and duality, Control Cybern. 32(4) (2003) 711–733.Google Scholar
  23. J.-P. Penot: Autoconjugate functions and representations of monotone operators, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 67 (2003) 277–284.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700033748Google Scholar
  24. J.-P. Penot: A representation of maximal monotone operators by closed convex functions and its impact on calculus rules, C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris 338(11) (2004) 853–858.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2004.03.017Google Scholar
  25. J.-P. Penot: The relevance of convex analysis for the study of monotonicity, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 58A(7–8) (2004) 855–871.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2004.05.018Google Scholar
  26. J.-P. Penot: Unilateral analysis and duality, in: GERAD, Essays and Surveys in Global Optimization, G. Savard et al. (eds.), Springer, New York (2005) 1–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25570-2_1Google Scholar
  27. J.-P. Penot: Natural closure, natural compositions and natural sums of monotone operators, J. Math. Pures Appl. 89(6) (2008) 523–537.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2008.02.001Google Scholar
  28. J.-P. Penot: Monotonicities and dualities, in: Generalized Convexity and Related Topics, I. V. Konnor, D. T. Luc, A. M. Rubinov (eds.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Math. Systems 583, Springer, Berlin (2007) 300–414.Google Scholar
  29. J.-P. Penot, C. Zălinescu: Some problems about the representation of monotone operators by convex functions, ANZIAM J. 47 (2005) 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1446181100009731Google Scholar
  30. J.-P. Penot, C. Zălinescu: On the convergence of maximal monotone operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 134(7) (2005) 1937–1946.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-05-08275-4Google Scholar
  31. S. Rolewicz: Convex analysis without linearity, Control Cybern. 23 (1994) 247–256.Google Scholar
  32. S. Rolewicz: Duality and convex analysis in the absence of linear structure, Math. Jap. 44(1) (1996) 165–182.Google Scholar
  33. S. Simons: Positive sets and monotone sets, J. Convex Analysis 14 (2007) 297–317.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca14021Google Scholar
  34. S. Simons: From Hahn-Banach to Monotonicity, Lecture Notes in Math. 1693, Springer, Berlin (2008).Google Scholar
  35. S. Simons, C. Zălinescu: A new proof for Rockafellar’s characterization of maximal monotone operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2004) 2969–2972.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07462-3Google Scholar
  36. S. Simons, C. Zălinescu: Fenchel duality, Fitzpatrick functions and maximal monotonicity, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 6(1) (2005) 1–22.Google Scholar
  37. C. Zălinescu: A new proof of the maximal monotonicity of the sum using the Fitzpatrick function, in: Variational Analysis and Applications, F. Giannessi, A. Maugeri (eds.), Springer, New York (2005) 1159–1172.https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24276-7_66Google Scholar

J.-P. Penot. “Positive Sets, Conservative Sets and Dissipative Sets.” Journal of Convex Analysis 16 (2009), No. 3&4, 973–986. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca16059