Abstract

There is a prejudice among some specialists of non linear partial differential equations and differential geometry: convex analysis is an elegant theory but too rigid to address some of the most interesting and challenging problems in their field. Convex analysis is mostly attached to elliptic and parabolic equations of variational origin, for which a suitable convex potential can be exhibited and shown to be minimized (either statically or dynamically). The Dirichlet principle for linear elliptic equation is archetypal. Hyperbolic PDEs, for example, seem to be inaccessible to convex analysis, since they are usually derived from variational principles that are definitely not convex. (However, convexity plays an important role in the so-called entropy conditions.) Also, elliptic systems with variational formulations (such as in elasticity theory) often involve structural conditions quite far from convexity (such as Hadamard's "rank one" conditions). (However, convexity can be often restored, for example through the concept of polyconvexity, or by various kinds of "relaxation" methods.) The purpose of the present paper is to show a few examples of nonlinear PDEs (mostly with strong geometric features) for which there is a hidden convex structure. This is not only a matter of curiosity. Once the convex structure is unrevealed, robust existence and uniqueness results can be unexpectedly obtained for very general data. Of course, as usual, regularity issues are left over as a hard post-process, but, at least, existence and uniqueness results are obtained in a large framework

Author information

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Yann Brenier

CNRS, Université de Nice, Dép. de Mathématiques, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice, France

brenier@math.unice.fr

References

  1. L. Ambrosio, A. Figalli: On the regularity of the pressure field of Brenier’s weak solutions to incompressible Euler equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 31 (2008) 497–509.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-007-0123-8Google Scholar
  2. S. Angenent, S. Haker, A. Tannenbaum: Minimizing flows for the Monge-Kantorovich problem, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 35 (2003) 61–97.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141002410927Google Scholar
  3. S. Angenent, E. Pichon, A. Tannenbaum: Mathematical methods in medical image processing, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., New Ser. 43 (2006) 365–396.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01104-9Google Scholar
  4. V. I. Arnold, B. Khesin: Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics, Springer, New York (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/b97593Google Scholar
  5. G. Aronsson, L. Evans, Y. Wu: Fast/slow diffusion and growing sandpiles, J. Differ. Equations 131 (1996) 304–335.https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1996.0166Google Scholar
  6. H. Attouch, G. Buttazzo, G. Michaille: Variational Analysis in Sobolev and BV Spaces. Applications to PDEs and Optimization, MPS/SIAM Series on Optimization 6, SIAM, Philadelphia (2006).https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718782Google Scholar
  7. M. Balinski: A competitive (dual) simplex method for the assignment problem, Math. Program. 34 (1986) 125–141.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580579Google Scholar
  8. J. Ball: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 63 (1977) 337–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279992Google Scholar
  9. J.-D. Benamou, Y. Brenier: A computational fluid mechanics solution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem, Numer. Math. 84 (2000) 375–393.https://doi.org/10.1007/s002110050002Google Scholar
  10. S. Bianchini, A. Bressan: Vanishing viscosity solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic systems, Ann. Math. (2) 161 (2005) 223–342.https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2005.161.223Google Scholar
  11. G. Boillat. C. Dafermos, P. Lax, T.P. Liu: Recent Mathematical Methods in Nonlinear Wave Propagation (Montecatini Terme, 1994), Lecture Notes in Math. 1640, Springer, Berlin (1996).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0093704Google Scholar
  12. M. Born: Théorie non-linéire du champ electromagnetique, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 7 (1937) 155–265.Google Scholar
  13. M. Born, L. Infeld: Foundations of the new field theory, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A 144 (1934) 425–451.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1934.0059Google Scholar
  14. Y. Brenier: Une application de la symétrisation de Steiner aux équations hyperboliques: la méthode de transport et écroulement, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 292 (1981) 563–566.Google Scholar
  15. Y. Brenier: Résolution d’équations d’évolution quasilinéaires en dimension N d’espace à l’aide d’équations linéaires en dimension N + 1, J. Differ. Equations 50 (1983) 375–390.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(83)90067-0Google Scholar
  16. Y. Brenier: Décomposition polaire et réarrangement monotone des champs de vecteurs, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 305 (1987) 805–808.Google Scholar
  17. Y. Brenier: The least action principle and the related concept of generalized flows for incompressible perfect fluids, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1989) 225–255.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-1989-0969419-8Google Scholar
  18. Y. Brenier: Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 44 (1991) 375–417.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160440402Google Scholar
  19. Y. Brenier: Minimal geodesics on groups of volume-preserving maps, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 52 (1999) 411–452.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199904)52:4<411::AID-CPA1>3.0.CO;2-3Google Scholar
  20. Y. Brenier: Hydrodynamic structure of the augmented Born-Infeld equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 172 (2004) 65–91.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-003-0291-4Google Scholar
  21. Y. Brenier: Order preserving vibrating strings and applications to electrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics, Methods Appl. Anal. 11 (2004) 515–532.https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2004.v11.n4.a5Google Scholar
  22. Y. Brenier: Non relativistic strings may be approximated by relativistic strings, Methods Appl. Anal. 12 (2005) 153–167.https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2005.v12.n2.a5Google Scholar
  23. Y. Brenier: L2 formulation of multidimensional scalar conservation laws, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., to appear, arXiv:math/0609761.Google Scholar
  24. H. Brezis: Opérateurs Maximaux Monotones et Semi-Groupes de Contractions dans les Espaces de Hilbert, North-Holland Mathematics Studies 5, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1973).Google Scholar
  25. G. Buttazzo, C. Jimenez, E. Oudet: An optimization problem for mass transportation with congested dynamics, SIAM J. Control Optim. 48 (2009) 1961–1976.https://doi.org/10.1137/07070543XGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Caffarelli: Boundary regularity of maps with convex potentials, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 45 (1992) 1141–1151.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160450905Google Scholar
  27. D. Chae, H. Huh: Global existence for small initial data in the Born-Infeld equations, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003) 6132–6139.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1621057Google Scholar
  28. C. Dafermos: Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, Springer, Berlin (2000).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-22019-1Google Scholar
  29. E. Dean, R. Glowinski: On the numerical solution of the elliptic Monge-Ampère equation in dimension two: a least-squares approach, in: Partial Differential Equations. Modelling and Numerical Simulation, R. Glowinski, P. Neittaanmäki (eds.), Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. 16, Springer, Dordrecht (2008) 43–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8758-5_3Google Scholar
  30. D. Ebin, J. Marsden: Groups of diffeomorphisms ano the motion of an incompressible fluid, Ann. Math. (2) 92 (1970) 102–163.https://doi.org/10.2307/1970699Google Scholar
  31. G. Loeper, F. Rapetti: Numerical solution of the Monge-Ampère equation by a Newton algorithm, C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris 340 (2005) 319–324.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2004.12.018Google Scholar
  32. L. Euler: Opera Omnia, Series Secunda 12 (1755) 274–361.Google Scholar
  33. A. Figalli, F. Maggi, A. Pratelli: A mass transportation approach to quantitative isoperimetric inequalities, CVGMT preprint, Pisa (2008).Google Scholar
  34. U. Frisch, S. Matarrese, R. Mohayaee, A. Sobolevski: A reconstruction of the initial conditions of the universe by optimal mass transportation, Nature 417 (2002) 260–262.https://doi.org/10.1038/417260aGoogle Scholar
  35. W. Gangbo: An elementary proof of the polar factorization of vector-valued functions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 128 (1994) 381–399.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00387715Google Scholar
  36. G. W. Gibbons: Aspects of Born-Infeld Theory and String/M-Theory, arXiv:hep-th/0106059.Google Scholar
  37. Y. Giga, T. Miyakawa: A kinetic construction of global solutions of first order quasilinear equations, Duke Math. J. 50 (1983) 505–515.https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-83-05022-6Google Scholar
  38. J. Glimm: Solutions in the large for nonlinear hyperbolic systems of equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 18 (1965) 697–715.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160180408Google Scholar
  39. F. Golse, B. Perthame, R. Sentis: Un résultat de compacité pour les équations de transport, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 301 (1985) 341–344.Google Scholar
  40. L. V. Kantorovich: On a problem of Monge, Usp. Mat. Nauk 3 (1948) 225–226.Google Scholar
  41. S. N. Kruzhkov: First order quasilinear equations with several independent variables, Mat. Sb., N. Ser. 81 (123) (1970) 228–255.Google Scholar
  42. H. Lindblad: A remark on global existence for small initial data of the minimal surface equation in Minkowskian space time, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2004) 1095–110.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07246-0Google Scholar
  43. P.-L. Lions, B. Perthame, E. Tadmor: A kinetic formulation of multidimensional scalar conservation laws and related equations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1994) 169–191.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-1994-1201239-3Google Scholar
  44. S. Osher, R. Fedkiw: Level Set Methods. Geometric Level Set Methods in Imaging, Vision, and Graphics, Springer, New York (2003).https://doi.org/10.1007/b97541Google Scholar
  45. S. Osher, J. Sethian: Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed, J. Comput. Phys. 79 (1988) 12–49.https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2Google Scholar
  46. L. Rüschendorf, S. T. Rachev: A characterization of random variables with minimum L2 -distance, J. Multivariate Anal. 32 (1990) 48–54.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-259X(90)90070-XGoogle Scholar
  47. A. Shnirelman: On the geometry of the group of diffeomorphisms and the dynamics of an ideal incompressible fluid, Math. USSR, Sb. 56 (1987) 79–105.https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1987v056n01ABEH003025Google Scholar
  48. A. I. Shnirelman: Generalized fluid flows, their approximation and applications, Geom. Funct. Anal. 4 (1994) 586–620.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01896409Google Scholar
  49. D. Serre: Hyperbolicity of the nonlinear models of Maxwell’s equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 172 (2004) 309–331.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-003-0303-4Google Scholar
  50. D. Serre: A remark on Y. Brenier’s approach to Born-Infeld electro-magnetic fields, in: Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Related Analysis (Evanston, 2002–2003), G.-Q. Chen et al. (ed.), Contemp. Math. 371, AMS, Providence (2005) 265–270.https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/371/06859Google Scholar
  51. C. Smith, M. Knott: Note on the optimal transportation of distributions, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 52 (1987) 323–329.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941290Google Scholar
  52. L. Tartar: Compacité par compensation: résultats et perspectives, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications (Paris, 1981–1982), H. Brezis et al. (ed.), Res. Notes in Math. 84, Pitman, Boston (1983) 350–369.Google Scholar
  53. Y.-H. R. Tsai, Y. Giga, S. Osher: A level set approach for computing discontinuous solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations, Math. Comput. 72 (2003) 159–181.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-02-01438-2Google Scholar
  54. C. Villani: Topics in Optimal Transportation, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003).https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/058Google Scholar
  55. L. C. Young: Lectures on the Calculus of Variations, Chelsea, New York (1980).Google Scholar

Suggested citation

Y. Brenier. “Hidden Convexity in some Nonlinear PDEs from Geomety and Physics.” Journal of Convex Analysis 17 (2010), No. 3&4, 945–959. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca17059

Download BibTeXPublished by Heldermann Verlag.

Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2010. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.