Following R. T. Rockafellar ["Convex Analysis", Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970)], a generalized nn-simplex in Rn\R^n is defined as the direct sum of an mm-simplex and a simplicial (n−m)(n - m)-cone, 0≤m≤n0 \le m \le n. R. Fourneau ["Nonclosed simplices and quasi-simplices", Mathematika 24 (1977) 71–85] showed that a line-free nn-dimensional closed convex set K⊂RnK \subset \R^n is a generalized nn-simplex if and only if all nn-dimensional intersections K∩(v+K)K \cap (v + K), v∈Rnv \in \R^n, are homothetic to KK. We extend this characteristic property by proving that for a pair of line-free nn-dimensional closed convex sets K1K_1 and K2K_2 in Rn\R^n the following two conditions are equivalent: (1) all nn-dimensional intersections K1∩(v+K2)K_1 \cap (v + K_2), v∈Rnv \in \R^n, belong to a unique homothety class of convex sets, (2) K1K_1 and K2K_2 are generalized nn-simplices whose nn-dimensional intersections K1∩(v+K2)K_1 \cap (v + K_2), v∈Rnv \in \R^n, are homothetic to a unique generalized nn-simplex.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Valeriu Soltan

Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, U.S.A.

vsoltan@gmu.edu
  1. L. Danzer, B. Grünbaum: Über zwei Probleme bezüglich konvexer Körper von P. Erdős und von V. L. Klee, Math. Z. 79 (1962) 95–99.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193107Google Scholar
  2. R. Fourneau: Nonclosed simplices and quasi-simplices, Mathematika 24 (1977) 71–85.https://doi.org/10.1112/S0025579300008937Google Scholar
  3. P. M. Gruber: Zur Charakterisierung konvexer Körper. Über einen Satz von Rogers und Shephard. II, Math. Ann. 184 (1970) 223–238.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350311Google Scholar
  4. D. Hinrichsen, U. Krause: Choice of techniques in joint production models, Oper. Res.-Verf. 34 (1979) 155–171.Google Scholar
  5. V. Klee: Extremal structure of convex sets, Arch. Math. 8 (1957) 234–240.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01899998Google Scholar
  6. V. Klee: Extremal structure of convex sets. II, Math. Z. 69 (1958) 90–104.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187394Google Scholar
  7. R. R. Phelps: Lectures on Choquet’s Theorem, Springer, Berlin (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/b76887Google Scholar
  8. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970).https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873173Google Scholar
  9. C. A. Rogers, G. C. Shephard: The difference body of a convex body, Arch. Math. 8 (1957) 220–233.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01899997Google Scholar
  10. R. Schneider: Mixed polytopes, Discrete Comput. Geom. 29 (2003) 575–593.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-002-0788-xGoogle Scholar
  11. V. Soltan: A characterization of homothetic simplices, Discrete Comput. Geom. 22 (1999) 193–200.https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009454Google Scholar
  12. V. Soltan: The characteristic intersection property of line-free Choquet simplices in E d, Discrete Comput. Geom. 29 (2003) 561–573.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-002-0790-3Google Scholar
  13. V. Soltan: Choquet simplexes in finite dimension – a survey, Expo. Math. 22 (2004) 301–315.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-0869(04)80012-4Google Scholar
  14. V. Soltan: Addition and subtraction of homothety classes of convex sets, Beitr. Algebra Geom. 47 (2006) 351–361.Google Scholar
  15. G. Winkler: Choquet Order and Simplices with Applications in Probabilistic Models, Springer, Berlin (1985).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0075051Google Scholar

V. Soltan. “A Characteristic Intersection Property of Generalized Simplices.” Journal of Convex Analysis 18 (2011), No. 2, 529–543. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca18034