Conjugation, or Legendre transformation, is a basic tool in convex analysis, rational mechanics, economics and optimization. It maps a function on a linear topological space into another one, defined in the dual of the linear space by coupling these spaces by means of the duality product. Generalized conjugation extends classical conjugation to any pair of domains, using an arbitrary coupling function between these spaces. This generalization of conjugation is now being widely used in optimal transportation problems, variational analysis and also optimization. If the coupled spaces are equal, generalized conjugations define order reversing maps of a family of functions into itself. In this case, it is natural to ask for the existence of fixed points of the conjugation, that is, functions which are equal to their (generalized) conjugated. Here we prove that any generalized symmetric conjugation has fixed points. The basic tool of the proof is a variational principle involving the order reversing feature of the conjugation. As an application of this abstract result, we will extend to real linear topological spaces a fixed-point theorem for Fitzpatrick's functions, previously proved in Banach spaces.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Maicon Marques Alves

Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada, Estrada Dona Castorina 110, Jardim Botânico, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22460-320, Brazil

maicon@impa.br

Benar Fux Svaiter

Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada, Estrada Dona Castorina 110, Jardim Botânico, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22460-320, Brazil

benar@impa.br
  1. V. I. Arnol′ d: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd Ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics 60, Springer, New York (1989).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1Google Scholar
  2. N. Bourbaki: Elements of Mathematics. Theory of Sets, Hermann, Paris (1968).Google Scholar
  3. R. S. Burachik, B. F. Svaiter: Maximal monotone operators, convex functions and a special family of enlargements, Technical Report A094, IMPA, Rio de Janeiro (2001); available at: http://www.preprint.impa.br/Shadows/SERIE_A/2001/94.html.Google Scholar
  4. R. S. Burachik, B. F. Svaiter: Maximal monotone operators, convex functions and a special family of enlargements, Set-Valued Anal. 10(4) (2002) 297–316.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020639314056Google Scholar
  5. S. Fitzpatrick: Representing monotone operators by convex functions, in: Functional Analysis and Optimization, Workshop / Miniconference (Canberra, 1988), Proc. Cent. Math. Anal. Aust. Natl. Univ. 20, Australian National University, Canberra (1988) 59–65.Google Scholar
  6. Xi-Nan Ma, N. S. Trudinger, Xu-Jia Wang: Regularity of potential functions of the optimal transportation problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 177(2) (2005) 151–183.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-005-0362-9Google Scholar
  7. J.-E. Martinez-Legaz, M. Théra: A convex representation of maximal monotone operators, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2(2) (2001) 243–247.Google Scholar
  8. J.-J. Moreau: Fonctionelles Convexes, Lecture Notes, College de France, Paris (1967).Google Scholar
  9. J.-J. Moreau: Inf-convolution, sous-additivité, convexité des fonctions numériques, J. Math. Pures Appl., IX. Sér. 49 (1970) 109–154.Google Scholar
  10. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton Mathematical Series 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970).Google Scholar
  11. R. T. Rockafellar, R. J.-B. Wets: Variational Analysis, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 317, Springer, Berlin (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3Google Scholar
  12. L. Rüschendorf: Optimal solutions of multivariate coupling problems, Appl. Math. 23(3) (1995) 325–338.https://doi.org/10.4064/am-23-3-325-338Google Scholar
  13. B. F. Svaiter: A family of enlargements of maximal monotone operators, Set-Valued Anal. 8(4) (2000) 311–328.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026555124541Google Scholar
  14. B. F. Svaiter: Fixed points in the family of convex representations of a maximal monotone operator, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131(12) (2003) 3851–3859.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07083-7Google Scholar
  15. C. Villani: Topics in Optimal Transportation, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 58, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003).https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/058Google Scholar
  16. C. Villani: Optimal transport, old and new, Technical Report (2007).Google Scholar

M. Marques Alves, B. F. Svaiter. “Fixed Points of Generalized Conjugations.” Journal of Convex Analysis 18 (2011), No. 2, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca18036