We prove that a locally Lipschitz function on an open subset GG of an Asplund space XX, whose restrictions to ``many lines'' are essentially smooth (i.e., almost everywhere strictly differentiable), is generically Fréchet differentiable on XX. In this way we obtain new proofs of known Fréchet differentiability properties of approximately convex functions, Lipschitz regular functions, saddle (or biconvex) Lipschitz functions, and essentially smooth functions (in the sense of Borwein and Moors), and also some new differentiability results (e.g., for partially DC functions). We show that classes of functions Seg(G)\Se_e^{g}(G) and Reg(G)\Rc_e^{g}(G) (defined via linear essential smoothness) are respectively larger than classes Se(G)\Se_e(G) (of essentially smooth functions) and Re(G)\Rc_e(G) studied by Borwein and Moors, and have also nice properties. In particular, we prove that members of Seg(G)\Se_e^{g}(G) are uniquely determined by their Clarke subdifferentials. We also show the inclusion Se(G)⊂Re(G)\Se_e(G) \subset \Rc_e(G) for Borwein-Moors classes.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Luděk Zajíček

Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Sokolovská 83, 186 75 Praha 8 - Karlín, Czech Republic

zajicek@karlin.mff.cuni.cz
  1. J. M. Borwein: Partially monotone operators and the generic differentiability of convex-concave and biconvex mappings, Isr. J. Math. 54 (1986) 42–50.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764875Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Borwein: Minimal cuscos and subgradients of Lipschitz functions, in: Fixed Point Theory and Applications (Marseille, 1989), J.-B. Baillion, M. Théra (eds.), Pitman Research Notes in Math. 252, Longman, Harlow (1991) 57–82.Google Scholar
  3. M. Bounkhel: On arc-wise essentially smooth mappings between Banach spaces, Optimization 51 (2002) 11–29.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331930211992Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Borwein, S. P. Fitzpatrick, J. R. Giles: The differentiability of real functions on normed linear space using generalized subgradients, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 128 (1987) 512–534.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(87)90203-4Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Borwein, S. Fitzpatrick, P. Kenderov: Minimal convex uscos and monotone operators on small sets, Can. J. Math. 43 (1991) 461–476.https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1991-028-5Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Borwein, W. B. Moors: Essentially smooth Lipschitz functions, J. Funct. Anal. 149 (1997) 305–351.https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan.1997.3101Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Borwein, W. B. Moors: A chain rule for essentially smooth Lipschitz functions, SIAM J. Optim. 8 (1998) 300–308.https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496297838Google Scholar
  8. J. Borwein, W. B. Moors: Null sets and essentially smooth Lipschitz functions, SIAM J. Optim. 8 (1998) 309–323.https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496305213Google Scholar
  9. J. Borwein, W. B. Moors: Separable determination of integrability and minimality of the Clarke subdifferential mapping, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (1999) 215–221.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-99-05001-7Google Scholar
  10. P. Cannarsa, C. Sinestrari: Semiconcave Functions, Hamilton-Jacobi Equations, and Optimal Control, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications 58, Birkhäuser, Boston (2004).https://doi.org/10.1007/b138356Google Scholar
  11. M. Cúth: Separable Reduction in Functional Analysis, Diploma Thesis, Charles University, Prague (2010) (in Czech).Google Scholar
  12. G. de Barra, S. Fitzpatrick, J. R. Giles: On generic differentiability of locally Lipschitz functions on Banach spaces, in: Functional Analysis and Optimization, Workshop / Miniconference (Canberra, 1988), Proc. Cent. Math. Anal. Aust. Natl. Univ. 20, Australian National University, Canberra (1988) 39–49.Google Scholar
  13. J. P. R. Christensen, P. S. Kenderov: Dense strong continuity of mappings and the Radon-Nikodym property, Math. Scand. 54 (1984) 70–78.https://doi.org/10.7146/math.scand.a-12041Google Scholar
  14. J. Duda, L. Zajíček: Semiconvex functions: representations as suprema of smooth functions and extensions, J. Convex Analysis 16 (2009) 239–260.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca16013Google Scholar
  15. I. Ekeland, G. Lebourg: Generic Fréchet-differentiability and perturbed optimization problems in Banach spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 224 (1976) 193–216.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1976-0431253-2Google Scholar
  16. H. Federer: Geometric Measure Theory, Springer, Berlin (1969).Google Scholar
  17. P. G. Georgiev: Locally Lipschitz and regular functions are Fréchet differentiable almost everywhere in Asplund spaces, C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 42 (1989) 13–15.Google Scholar
  18. M. Gieraltowska-Kedzierska, F. S. Van Vleck: Fréchet differentiability of regular locally Lipschitzian functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 159 (1991) 147–157.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(91)90226-PGoogle Scholar
  19. J. R. Giles, S. Sciffer: Locally Lipschitz functions are generically pseudo-regular on separable Banach spaces, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 47 (1993) 205–212.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700012430Google Scholar
  20. W. B. Johnson, J. Lindenstrauss, D. Preiss, G. Schechtman: Almost Fréchet differentiability of Lipschitz mappings between infinite-dimensional Banach spaces, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III. Ser. 84 (2002) 711–746.https://doi.org/10.1112/S0024611502013400Google Scholar
  21. G. Lebourg: Generic differentiability of Lipschitzian functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 256 (1979) 125–144.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1979-0546911-1Google Scholar
  22. J. Lindenstrauss, D. Preiss, J. Tišer: Fréchet differentiability of Lipschitz maps and porous sets in Banach spaces, to appear.Google Scholar
  23. P. Mattila: Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces. Fractals and Rectifiability, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623813Google Scholar
  24. B. S. Mordukhovich: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation. I: Basic Theory, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 330, Springer, Berlin (2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31247-1Google Scholar
  25. H. V. Ngai, D. T. Luc, M. Théra: Approximate convex functions, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 1 (2000) 155–176.Google Scholar
  26. H. V. Ngai, J.-P. Penot: In Asplund spaces, approximately convex functions and regular functions are generically differentiable, Taiwanese J. Math. 12 (2008) 1477-1492.https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500405035Google Scholar
  27. J. C. Oxtoby: Measure and Category. A Survey of the Analogies between Topological and Measure Spaces, 2nd Ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics 2, Springer, New York (1980).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9339-9Google Scholar
  28. D. Preiss: Gâteaux differentiable Lipschitz functions need not be Fréchet differentiable on a residual subset, Suppl. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, II. Ser. (1982) 217–222.Google Scholar
  29. L. Qi: The maximal normal operator space and integration of subdifferentials of nonconvex functions, Nonlinear. Anal. 13 (1989) 1003–1012.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(89)90091-6Google Scholar
  30. M. Valadier: Lignes de descente de fonctions lipschitziennes non pathologiques, Sémin. d’Analyse Convexe Montpellier 18(9) (1988) 10 pp.Google Scholar
  31. M. Valadier: Entraîtement unilatéral, lignes de descente, fonctions Lipschitziennes non pathologiques, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 308, Series I (1989) 241–244.Google Scholar
  32. L. Veselý, L. Zajíček: Delta-convex mappings between Banach spaces and applications, Diss. Math. 289 (1989) 48 pp.Google Scholar
  33. L. Zajíček: Differentiability of the distance function and points of multi-valuedness of the metric projection in Banach space, Czech. Math. J. 33 (1983) 292–308.https://doi.org/10.21136/CMJ.1983.101878Google Scholar
  34. L. Zajíček: A generalization of an Ekeland-Lebourg theorem and the differentiability of distance functions, Suppl. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, II. Ser. 3 (1984) 403–410.Google Scholar
  35. L. Zajíček: Fréchet differentiability, strict differentiability and subdifferentiability, Czech. Math. J. 41(116) (1991) 471–489.https://doi.org/10.21136/CMJ.1991.102482Google Scholar
  36. L. Zajíček: Differentiability of approximately convex, semiconcave and strongly paraconvex functions, J. Convex Analysis 15 (2008) 1–15.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca15001Google Scholar

L. Zajíček. “Generic Fréchet Differentiability on Asplund Spaces via A.E. Strict Differentiability on Many Lines.” Journal of Convex Analysis 19 (2012), No. 1, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca19002