Abstract

We extend to the case of W1,1loc functions a formula, known for C1 functions, for the computation of the shape derivative of an integral cost functional with respect to a class of admissible convex domains. The convexity context allows one to use the support functions of the domains to express the shape derivative. We shall also illustrate the formula by applying it to the computation of the shape derivative for a shape optimization problem and by giving an algorithm

Author information

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Abdesslam Boulkhemair

Lab. de Mathématiques Jean Leray, Université de Nantes, 2, rue de la Houssinière, 44322 Nantes, France
and: CNRS UMR6629

boulkhemair-a@univ-nantes.fr

Abdelkrim Chakib

Lab. de Mathématiques et Applications, FST de Beni-Mellal, Université Sultan Moulay Slimane, B.P. 523, Beni-Mellal, Morocco

chakib@fstbm.ac.ma

References

  1. A. A. Niftiyev, Y. S. Gasimov: Control by Boundaries and Eigenvalue Problems with Variable Domains, Publishing House of Baku State University, Baku (2004) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. V. P. Demyanov, A. M. Rubinov: Bases of Non-Smooth Analysis and Quasi-Differential Calculus, Nauka, Moscow (1990) (in Russian).Google Scholar
  3. A. Henrot, M. Pierre: Variation et Optimisation de Formes. Une Analyse Géométrique, Mathématiques & Applications 48, Springer, Berlin (2005).https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37689-5Google Scholar
  4. L. Hörmander: Notions of Convexity, Progress in Mathematics 127, Birkhäuser, Basel (1994).Google Scholar
  5. L. Evans, R. Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, CRC Press, Boca Raton (1992).Google Scholar
  6. L. Webster: Convexity, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994).Google Scholar
  7. R. Schneider: Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526282Google Scholar
  8. A. Boulkhemair, A. Chakib, A. Nachaoui, A. A. Niftiyev: A new numerical optimal shape design approach for a class of free boundary problems, in preparation.Google Scholar
  9. G. Allaire: Conception Optimale de Structures, Mathématiques et Applications 58, Springer, Berlin (2007) (in French).Google Scholar
  10. Y. D. Burago, V. A. Zalgaller: Geometric Inequalities, Springer, Berlin (1988).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07441-1Google Scholar
  11. A. A. Niftiyev: On an optimal control problem with unknown boundaries, Trans. Acad. Sci. Azerb., Ser. Phys.-Tech. Math. Sci. 18(3–4) Math. Mech. (1998) 246–251.Google Scholar
  12. Y. S. Gasimov, A. A. Niftiyev: Minimization of eigenvalues of the Schrödinger operator with respect to the domain, Differ. Uravn. 38(6) (2002) 842–844, 863–864 (in Russian); Differ. Equ. 38(6) (2002) 892–896 (in English).https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020326716018Google Scholar
  13. A. Boulkhemair, A. Chakib: On a shape derivative formula in shape optimization, Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaidjan 68 CILD (1) (2012) 1–8.Google Scholar

Suggested citation

A. Boulkhemair, A. Chakib. “On a Shape Derivative Formula with Respect to Convex Domains.” Journal of Convex Analysis 21 (2014), No. 1, 67–87. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca21004

Download BibTeXPublished by Heldermann Verlag.

Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2014. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.