Abstract
We analyze the concentration phenomena which occur in thin rods, solving the following optimization problem: a given fraction of elastic material must be distributed into a cylindrical design region with infinitesimal cross section in an optimal way, so that it maximizes the resistance to a given external load. For small volume fractions, the optimal configuration of material is described by a measure which concentrates on 2-rectifiable sets. For some choices of the external charging, the concentration phenomena turn out to be related to some new variants of the Cheeger problem of the cross section of the rod. The same study has already been carried out recently in the particular case of pure torsion regime by G. Bouchitté, I. Fragalà, I. Lucardesi and P. Seppecher ["Optimal thin torsion rods and Cheeger sets", SIAM J. Math. Anal. 44 (2012) 483-512]. Here we extend those results by enlarging the class of admissible loads.
References
- G. Allaire: Shape Optimization by the Homogenization Method, Springer, New York (2002).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9286-6Google Scholar
- J. J. Alibert, G. Bouchitté, I. Fragalà, I. Lucardesi: A nonstandard free boundary problem arising in the shape optimization of thin torsion rods, Interfaces Free Bound. 15(1) (2013) 95–119.https://doi.org/10.4171/ifb/296Google Scholar
- F. Alter, V. Caselles: Uniqueness of the Cheeger set of a convex body, Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009) 32–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.11.032Google Scholar
- G. Bouchitté: Convex analysis and duality methods, in: Variational Techniques, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, J.-P. Françoise, G. L. Naber, T. S. Tsun (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006) 642–652.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-512666-2/00487-9Google Scholar
- G. Bouchitté, I. Fragalà: Second-order energies on thin structures: variational theory and non-local effects, J. Funct. Anal. 204 (2003) 228–267.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1236(02)00181-7Google Scholar
- G. Bouchitté, I. Fragalà, I. Lucardesi, P. Seppecher: Optimal thin torsion rods and Cheeger sets, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 44 (2012) 483–512.https://doi.org/10.1137/110828538Google Scholar
- G. Bouchitté, I. Fragalà, P. Seppecher: Structural optimization of thin plates: the three dimensional approach, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 202 (2011) 829–874.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-011-0435-xGoogle Scholar
- A. Figalli, F. Maggi, A. Pratelli: A note on Cheeger sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009) 2057–2062.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-09-09795-0Google Scholar
- V. Fridman, B. Kawohl: Isoperimetric estimates for the first eigenvalue of the p-Laplace operator and the Cheeger constant, Commentat. Math. Univ. Carol. 44 (2003) 659–667.Google Scholar
- I. R. Ionescu, T. Lachand-Robert: Generalized Cheeger sets related to landslides, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 23 (2005) 227–249.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-004-0300-yGoogle Scholar
- B. Kawohl, T. Lachand Robert: Characterization of Cheeger sets for convex subsets of the plane, Pac. J. Math. 225 (2006) 103–118.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2006.225.103Google Scholar
- S. Sorin: A First Course on Zero-Sum Repeated Games, Springer, Paris (2002).Google Scholar
- L. Trabucho, J. M. Viaño: Mathematical modelling of rods, in: Handbook of Numerical Analysis IV, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1996) 487–974.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-8659(96)80006-8Google Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2015. Rights now held by Banach Press.
