The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationships between some classes of non-Archimedean injective Banach spaces. The results obtained reveal sharp and interesting contrasts with the classical situation (i.e. for Banach spaces over the reals R\mathbb{R} or the complex numbers C\mathbb{C}, recently studied by A. Avilés, F. Cabello Sánchez, J.M.F. Castillo, M. González and Y. Moreno [On separably injective Banach spaces, Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 192-216]. One of those contrasts has to do with a classical open problem whose roots come back to 1964. In fact, in that year J. Lindenstrauss [Extension of compact operators, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1964); On the extension of operators with range in a C(K) space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1964) 218-225] obtained that, under the continuum hypothesis, 1-separably injective Banach spaces over R\mathbb{R} or C\mathbb{C} are 1-universally separably injective. He left open the question in the usual setting of set theory with the Axiom of Choice. A negative answer, for a Banach space of continuous functions on a compact space, was given in the first paper cited above, where the authors also posed a so natural classical problem as the following one: Without the continuum hypothesis, 1-separably injective classical Banach spaces must be universally separably injective? However, we prove in this paper that, for any non-Archimedean Banach space, all the 1-injectivity properties coincide. Additionally, for spaces of continuous functions on a zero-dimensional compact space, we get the coincidence of all the non-Archimedean injectivity properties.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Cristina Perez-Garcia

Dept. of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Cantabria,
Avda. de los Castros s/n, 39071 Santander, Spain

perezmc@unican.es
  1. A. V. Arkhangel′ skii, V. I. Ponomarev: Fundamentals of General Topology, Mathematics and its Applications 13, D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984).Google Scholar
  2. A. Avilés, F. Cabello Sánchez, J. M. F. Castillo, M. González, Y. Moreno: On separably injective Banach spaces, Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 192–216.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2012.10.013Google Scholar
  3. F. Cabello Sánchez, J. M. F. Castillo, D. Yost: Sobczyk’s theorems from A to B, Extr. Math. 15 (2000) 391–420.Google Scholar
  4. J. Diestel, J. H. Fourie, J. Swart: The metric theory of tensor products, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008).https://doi.org/10.1090/mbk/052Google Scholar
  5. I. E. Leonard, J. H. M. Whitfield: A classical Banach space: ℓ∞ /c0, Rocky Mt. J. Math. 13 (1983) 531–539.https://doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-1983-13-3-531Google Scholar
  6. J. Lindenstrauss: Extension of compact operators, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1964), 112 pp.https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/0048Google Scholar
  7. J. Lindenstrauss: On the extension of operators with range in a C(K) space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1964) 218–225.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1964-0167822-4Google Scholar
  8. J. Lindenstrauss, L. Tzafriri: Classical Banach Spaces I, Springer, Berlin (1977).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66557-8Google Scholar
  9. V. Mascioni: Topics in the theory of complemented subspaces in Banach spaces, Expo. Math. 7 (1989) 3–47.Google Scholar
  10. C. Perez-Garcia, W. H. Schikhof: Locally Convex Spaces over Non-Archimedean Valued Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511729959Google Scholar
  11. W. H. Schikhof: Banach spaces over nonarchimedean valued fields, Topol. Proc. 24 (1999) 547–581.Google Scholar
  12. A. C. M. van Rooij: Non-Archimedean Functional Analysis, Marcel Dekker, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  13. M. Zippin: The separable extension problem, Isr. J. Math. 26 (1977) 372–387.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03007653Google Scholar

C. Perez-Garcia. “Non-Archimedean Countably Injective Banach Spaces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 22 (2015), No. 3, 733–746. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22037