Given convex u∈C(Ωˉ)u\in C(\bar{\Omega}) with Monge-Ampère measure MuMu, and finite Borel measures μ\mu and ν\nu satisfying μ+ν=Mu\mu + \nu = Mu, consider the problem of determining a `splitting' u=v+wu=v+w for uu where v,w∈C(Ωˉ)v,w \in C(\bar{\Omega}) are convex functions satisfying Mv=μMv=\mu, Mw=νMw=\nu, so that Mu=M(v+w)=Mv+MwMu=M(v+w)=Mv + Mw. It is shown that although this problem is not in general solvable, a best LpL^p approximation v∗+w∗v^\ast+w^\ast for uu may always be found. In particular, letting U=sup(v,w)∈F (v+w)U={\rm sup}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}~(v+w), there exist optimal sums v∗+w∗v^\ast+w^\ast achieving inf(v,w)∈F ∥u−(v+w)∥p{\rm inf}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}~\|u-(v+w)\|_p and inf(v,w)∈F ∥U−(v+w)∥p{\rm inf}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}~\|U-(v+w)\|_p, p≥1p\ge 1, for appropriately constrained classes F{\cal F} of feasible pairs (v,w)(v,w) of convex functions satisfying Mv=μMv=\mu, Mw=νMw=\nu and v+w=uv+w=u on ∂Ω\partial\Omega. Moreover, UU may be written as U=vˉ+wˉU=\bar{v}+\bar{w} within Ωˉ\bar{\Omega}, (vˉ,wˉ)∈F(\bar{v},\bar{w})\in {\cal F}. The analysis depends upon basic properties of convex functions and the measures they determine. We also consider the related problem of characterizing functions u∈W2,n(Ω)u\in W^{2,n}(\Omega) which may be realized as differences u=v−wu=v-w of convex functions v,w∈W2,n(Ω)v,w\in W^{2,n}(\Omega) with Mu=Mv−MwMu=Mv-Mw. Here MuMu is the signed measure defined by dMu=det D2u dxdMu={\rm det}~D^2u\,dx. Letting U−=sup(v,w)∈F(v−w)U^-={\rm sup}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}(v-w) and U−=inf(v,w)∈F(v−w)U_-={\rm inf}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}(v-w), we show that optimal differences v∗−w∗v^\ast-w^\ast exist for the problems inf(v,w)∈F ∥u−(v−w)∥p{\rm inf}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}~\|u-(v-w)\|_p, inf(v,w)∈F ∥U−−(v−w)∥p{\rm inf}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}~\|U^--(v-w)\|_p and inf(v,w)∈F ∥U−−(v−w)∥p{\rm inf}_{(v,w)\in {\cal F}}~\|U_- -(v-w)\|_p. Also, U−=v−−w−U^-=v^--w^- and U−=v−−w−U_-=v_--w_- for appropriate pairs (v−,w−),(v−,w−)∈F(v^-,w^-),(v_-,w_-)\in {\cal F}. Finally, the relaxed problem of finding v+w=uv+w=u for general MvMv and MwMw with Mv+Mw=MuMv+Mw = Mu (no fixed μ\mu and ν\nu), is considered. Topological properties of the collection of these relaxed splitting pairs (v,w)(v,w), and those for the unrelaxed problem, for a given uu, are developed.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

David F. Miller

Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, U.S.A.

david.miller@wright.edu
  1. A. D. Alexandrov: On functions which may be represented by differences of convex surfaces, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, n. Ser. 72 (1950) 613–616.Google Scholar
  2. A. D. Alexandrov: Certain estimates for the dirichlet problem, Sov. Math., Dokl. 1 (1961) 1151–1154.Google Scholar
  3. A. D. Alexandrov: Majorization of solutions of second-order linear equations, Amer. Math. Soc., Transl., II. Ser. 68 (1968) 120–143.https://doi.org/10.1090/trans2/068/05Google Scholar
  4. I. J. Bakelman: Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Geometric Elliptic Equations, Springer, Berlin (1994).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69881-1Google Scholar
  5. L. A. Caffarelli: Interior W 2,p estimates for solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation, Ann. Math. 131 (1990) 135–150.https://doi.org/10.2307/1971510Google Scholar
  6. L. A. Caffarelli: Some regularity properties of solutions of Monge-Ampère equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 44 (1991) 965–969.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160440809Google Scholar
  7. L. A. Caffarelli, C. E. Gutièrrez: Real analysis related to the Monge-Ampère equation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348(3) (1996) 1075–1092.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01473-0Google Scholar
  8. L. A. Caffarelli, C. E. Gutièrrez: Properties of the solutions of the linearized Monge-Ampère equation, Amer. J. Math. 119(2) (1997) 423–465.https://doi.org/10.1353/ajm.1997.0010Google Scholar
  9. C. E. Gutièrrez, Q. Huang: Geometric properties of the sections of solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352(2) (2000) 4381–4396.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02491-0Google Scholar
  10. C. E. Gutièrrez: The Monge-Ampère Equation, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications 44, Birkhäuser, Boston (2001).Google Scholar
  11. P. Hartman: On functions representable as a difference of convex functions, Pac. J. Math. 9 (1959) 707–713.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1959.9.707Google Scholar
  12. E. M. Landis: On functions representable as the difference of two convex functions, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, n. Ser. 72 (1950) 613–616.Google Scholar
  13. A. V. Pogorelov: Monge-Ampère Equations of Elliptic Type, P. Noordhoff, Groningen (1964).Google Scholar
  14. J. Rauch, B. A. Taylor: The dirichlet problem for the multidimensional Monge-Ampère equation, Rocky Mt. J. Math. 7(2) (1977) 345–364.https://doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-1977-7-2-345Google Scholar
  15. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970).https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873173Google Scholar
  16. H. Tuy: Convex Analysis and Global Optimization, Nonconvex Optimization and Global Optimization 22, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998) 707–713.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2809-5Google Scholar

D. F. Miller. “Monge-Ampère Type Function Splittings.” Journal of Convex Analysis 22 (2015), No. 3, 769–796. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22039