We present some results concerning the family CW\mathcal{CW} of sets with constant width and the family DM\mathcal{DM} of diametrically maximal (or diametrically complete) sets. In particular we prove (Theorem 2) that CW=DM\mathcal{CW} = \mathcal{DM} in Hilbert spaces.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Luigi Caspani

Dip. di Matematica "F. Enriques", Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Saldini 50, 20133 Milano, Italy

luigi.caspani@gmail.com

Pier Luigi Papini

Dip. di Matematica, Università di Bologna, Piazza di Porta S. Donato 5, 40126 Bologna, Italy

pierluigi.papini@unibo.it
  1. G. Averkov: On cross-section measures in Minkowski spaces, Extr. Math. 18 (2003) 201–208.Google Scholar
  2. M. Baronti, P. L. Papini: Diameters, centers and diametrically maximal sets, Suppl. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, II. Ser. 38 (1995) 11–24.Google Scholar
  3. G. D. Chakerian, H. Groemer: Convex bodies of constant width, in: Convexity and its Applications, P. M. Gruber, J. M Wills (eds.), Birkhäuser, Basel (1983) 49–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5858-8_3Google Scholar
  4. L. Dalla, N. K. Tamvakis: Sets of constant width and diametrically complete sets in normed spaces, Bull. Greek Math. Soc. 26 (1985) 27–39.Google Scholar
  5. C. Franchetti: Relationship between the Jung constant and a certain projection constant in Banach spaces, Ann. Univ. Ferrara, N. Ser., Sez. VII 33 (1977) 39–44.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825987Google Scholar
  6. P. Gritzmannn, V. Klee: Inner and outer j-radii of convex bodies in finite-dimensional normed spaces, Discrete Comput. Geom. 7 (1992) 255–280.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187841Google Scholar
  7. A. S. Granero, J. P. Moreno, R. R. Phelps: Mazur sets in normed spaces, Discrete Comput. Geom. 31 (2004) 411–420.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-003-0808-5Google Scholar
  8. J. P. Moreno, P. L. Papini, R. R. Phelps: Diametrically maximal and constant width sets in Banach spaces, Can. J. Math. 58 (2006) 820–842.https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-2006-033-1Google Scholar
  9. J. P. Moreno, P. L. Papini, R. R. Phelps: New families of convex sets related to diametral maximality, J. Convex Analysis 13 (2006) 823–837.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca13061Google Scholar
  10. H. Martini, K. J. Swanepoel: The geometry of Minkowski spaces - a survey. Part II, Expo. Math. 22 (2004) 93–144.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-0869(04)80009-4Google Scholar
  11. H. Martini, K. J. Swanepoel, G. Weiss: The geometry of Minkowski spaces - a survey. Part I, Expo. Math. 19 (2001) 97–142.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-0869(01)80025-6Google Scholar
  12. J. P. Moreno, R. Schneider: Diametrically complete sets in Minkowski spaces, Isr. J. Math. 191 (2012) 701–720.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-012-0003-6Google Scholar
  13. M. Naszódi, B. Visy: Sets with a unique extension to a set of constant width, in: Discrete Geometry, K. Bezdek (ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York (2003) 373–380.https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203911211.ch27Google Scholar
  14. R. Payá, Á. Rodríguez-Palacios: Banach spaces which are semi L-summands in their biduals, Math. Ann. 289 (1991) 529–542.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01446587Google Scholar
  15. E. S. Polovinkin: Convex bodies of constant width, Dokl. Mat. 70 (2004) 560–562.Google Scholar
  16. M. Spirova: On a theorem of G. D. Chakerian, Contrib. Discrete Math. 5 (2010) 107–118.https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/cdm.v5i1.62034Google Scholar
  17. L. Veselý: Convex sets without diametral pairs, Extr. Math. 24 (2009) 271–280.Google Scholar
  18. R. Webster: Convexity, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford Univ. Press, New York (1994).Google Scholar

L. Caspani, P. L. Papini. “On Constant Width Sets in Hilbert Spaces and Around.” Journal of Convex Analysis 22 (2015), No. 3, 889–900. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22046