The regular N-gon provides the minimal Cheeger constant in the class of all N-gons with fixed volume. This result is due to a work of D. Bucur and I. Fragalà [A Faber-Krahn inequality for the Cheeger Constant of N-gons, J. of Geometric Analysis (2014)]. In this note, we address the stability of their result in terms of the L1 distance between sets. Furthermore, we provide a stability inequality in terms of the Hausdorff distance between the boundaries of sets in the class of polygons having uniformly bounded diameter. Finally, we show that our results are sharp, both in the exponent of decay and in the notion of distance between sets

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Marco Caroccia

Dip. di Matematica, Università di Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy

caroccia.marco@gmail.com
  1. D. Bucur, I. Fragalà: A Faber-Krahn inequality for the Cheeger constant of N-gons, J. Geom. Anal. (2014), to appear.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-014-9539-5Google Scholar
  2. G. Buttazzo: Spectral optimization problems, Rev. Mat. Complut. 24(2) (2011) 277–322.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13163-011-0066-7Google Scholar
  3. M. Caroccia, F. Maggi: A sharp quantitative version of Hales’ isoperimetric honeycomb theorem, arXiv:1410.6128 [math.AP], (2014).Google Scholar
  4. M. Cicalese, G. P. Leonardi: A selection principle for the sharp quantitative isoperimetric inequality, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 206(2) (2012) 617–643.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-012-0544-1Google Scholar
  5. A. Figalli, F. Maggi, A. Pratelli: A mass transportation approach to quantitative isoperimetric inequalities, Invent. Math. 182(1) (2010) 167–211.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-010-0261-zGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Figalli, F. Maggi, A. Pratelli: A note on Cheeger sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137(6) (2009) 2057–2062.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-09-09795-0Google Scholar
  7. N. Fusco, F. Maggi, A. Pratelli: The sharp quantitative isoperimetric inequality, Ann. Math. (2) (2008) 941–980.https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2008.168.941Google Scholar
  8. E. Indrei, L. Nurbekyan: On the stability of the polygonal isoperimetric inequality, arXiv:1402.4460 [math.CA], (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2015.02.013Google Scholar
  9. B. Kawohl, T. Lachand-Robert: Characterization of Cheeger sets for convex subsets of the plane, Pacific J. Math. 225(1) (2006) 103–118.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2006.225.103Google Scholar
  10. B. Kawohl, M. Novaga: The p-Laplace eigenvalue problem as p→ 1 and Cheeger sets in a Finsler metric, J. Convex Analysis 15(3) (2008) 623–634.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca15043Google Scholar
  11. G. Pólya, G. Szegö: Isoperimetric Inequalities in Mathematical Physics, Ann. Math. Studies 27, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1951).https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882663Google Scholar

M. Caroccia, R. Neumayer. “A Note on the Stability of the Cheeger Constant of N-gons.” Journal of Convex Analysis 22 (2015), No. 4, 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22063