We consider state constrained optimal control problems in which the cost to minimize comprises both integral and end-point terms, establishing normality of the generalized Euler-Lagrange condition. Simple examples illustrate that the validity of the Euler-Lagrange condition (and related necessary conditions), in normal form, depends crucially on the interplay between velocity sets, the left end-point constraint set and the state constraint set. We show that this is actually a common feature for general state constrained optimal control problems, in which the state constraint is represented by closed convex sets and the left end-point constraint is a closed set. In these circumstances classical constraint qualifications involving the state constraints and the velocity sets cannot be used alone to guarantee normality of the necessary conditions. A key feature of this paper is to prove that the additional information involving tangent vectors to the left end-point and the state constraint sets can be used to establish normality.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Piernicola Bettiol

Laboratoire de Mathématiques, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 6 Avenue Victor Le Gorgeu, 29200 Brest, France

piernicola.bettiol@univ-brest.fr

Nathalie Khalil

Laboratoire de Mathématiques, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 6 Avenue Victor Le Gorgeu, 29200 Brest, France

nathalie.khalil@univ-brest.fr

Richard B. Vinter

Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2BT, England

r.vinter@imperial.ac.uk
  1. A. V. Arutyunov, S. M. Aseev: Investigation of the degeneracy phenomenon of the maximum principle for optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control Optim. 35 (1997) 930–952.https://doi.org/10.1137/S036301299426996XGoogle Scholar
  2. J. P. Aubin, H. Frankowska: Set-Valued Analysis, Birkhäuser, Boston (1990).Google Scholar
  3. P. Bettiol, A. Bressan, R. B. Vinter: On trajectories satisfying a state constraint: W 1,1 estimates and counter-examples, SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(7) (2010) 4664–4679.https://doi.org/10.1137/090769788Google Scholar
  4. P. Bettiol, G. Facchi: Linear estimates for trajectories of state-constrained differential inclusions and normality conditions in optimal control, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 414(2) (2014) 914–933.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.01.009Google Scholar
  5. P. Bettiol, H. Frankowska: Normality of the maximum principle for non convex constrained Bolza problems, J. Differ. Equations 243(2) (2007) 256–269.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2007.05.005Google Scholar
  6. P. Bettiol, H. Frankowska, R. B. Vinter: L∞ estimates on trajectories confined to a closed subset, J. Differ. Equations 252 (2012) 1912–1933.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2011.09.007Google Scholar
  7. P. Bettiol, R. B. Vinter: Trajectories satisfying a smooth state constraint: improved estimates, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 56(5) (2011) 1090–1096.https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2010.2088670Google Scholar
  8. A. Bressan, G. Facchi: Trajectories of differential inclusions with state constraints, J. Diff. Equations 250 (2011) 2267–2281.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2010.12.021Google Scholar
  9. F. H. Clarke: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, Wiley, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  10. A. Yu. Dubovitskii, A. A. Milyutin: Extremum problems in the presence of restrictions, U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 5(3) (1965) 1–80.https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(65)90148-5Google Scholar
  11. M. M. A. Ferreira, F. A. C. C. Fontes, R. Vinter: Nondegenerate necessary conditions for nonconvex optimal control problems with state constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 233(1) (1999) 116–129.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6270Google Scholar
  12. M. M. A. Ferreira, R. Vinter: When is the maximum principle for state constrained problems nondegenerate?, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 187(2) (1994) 438–467.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1994.1366Google Scholar
  13. F. A. C. C. Fontes, S. O. Lopes, R. de Pinho: On constraint qualifications for nondegenerate neccesary conditions of optimality applied to optimal control problems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 29(2) (2011) 559–575.https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2011.29.559Google Scholar
  14. F. A. C. C. Fontes, S. O. Lopes: Normal forms of necessary conditions for dynamic optimization problems with pathwise inequality constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 399(1) (2013) 27–37.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.09.049Google Scholar
  15. H. Frankowska: Normality of the maximum principle for absolutely continuous solutions to Bolza problems under state constraints, Control Cybern. 38(4B) (2009) 1327–1340.Google Scholar
  16. H. Frankowska, D. Tonon: Inward pointing trajectories, normality of the maximum principle and the non occurrence of the Lavrentieff phenomenon in optimal control under state constraints, J. Convex Analysis 20(4) (2013) 1147–1180.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca20062Google Scholar
  17. R. A. Poliquin, R. T. Rockafellar, L. Thibault: Local differentiability of distance functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000) 5231–5249.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02550-2Google Scholar
  18. M. Palladino, R. B. Vinter: Minimizers that are not also relaxed minimizers, SIAM J. Control Optim. 52(4) (2014) 2164–2179.https://doi.org/10.1137/130909627Google Scholar
  19. F. Rampazzo, R. B. Vinter: A theorem on existence of neighboring trajectories satisfying a state constraint, with applications to optimal control, IMA J. Math. Control Inf. 16 (1999) 335–351.https://doi.org/10.1093/imamci/16.4.335Google Scholar
  20. F. Rampazzo, R. B. Vinter: Degenerate optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control Optim. 39 (2000) 989–1007.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012998340223Google Scholar
  21. R. T. Rockafellar: Clarke’s tangent cones and the boundaries of closed sets in Rn, Nonlinear Anal. 3(1) (1979) 145–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(79)90044-0Google Scholar
  22. R. B. Vinter: Optimal Control, Birkhäuser, Boston (2000).Google Scholar

P. Bettiol, N. Khalil, R. B. Vinter. “Normality of Generalized Euler-Lagrange Conditions for State Constrained Optimal Control Problems.” Journal of Convex Analysis 23 (2016), No. 1, 291–311. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca23011