Abstract
We consider state constrained optimal control problems in which the cost to minimize comprises both integral and end-point terms, establishing normality of the generalized Euler-Lagrange condition. Simple examples illustrate that the validity of the Euler-Lagrange condition (and related necessary conditions), in normal form, depends crucially on the interplay between velocity sets, the left end-point constraint set and the state constraint set. We show that this is actually a common feature for general state constrained optimal control problems, in which the state constraint is represented by closed convex sets and the left end-point constraint is a closed set. In these circumstances classical constraint qualifications involving the state constraints and the velocity sets cannot be used alone to guarantee normality of the necessary conditions. A key feature of this paper is to prove that the additional information involving tangent vectors to the left end-point and the state constraint sets can be used to establish normality.
References
- A. V. Arutyunov, S. M. Aseev: Investigation of the degeneracy phenomenon of the maximum principle for optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control Optim. 35 (1997) 930–952.https://doi.org/10.1137/S036301299426996XGoogle Scholar
- J. P. Aubin, H. Frankowska: Set-Valued Analysis, Birkhäuser, Boston (1990).Google Scholar
- P. Bettiol, A. Bressan, R. B. Vinter: On trajectories satisfying a state constraint: W 1,1 estimates and counter-examples, SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(7) (2010) 4664–4679.https://doi.org/10.1137/090769788Google Scholar
- P. Bettiol, G. Facchi: Linear estimates for trajectories of state-constrained differential inclusions and normality conditions in optimal control, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 414(2) (2014) 914–933.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.01.009Google Scholar
- P. Bettiol, H. Frankowska: Normality of the maximum principle for non convex constrained Bolza problems, J. Differ. Equations 243(2) (2007) 256–269.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2007.05.005Google Scholar
- P. Bettiol, H. Frankowska, R. B. Vinter: L∞ estimates on trajectories confined to a closed subset, J. Differ. Equations 252 (2012) 1912–1933.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2011.09.007Google Scholar
- P. Bettiol, R. B. Vinter: Trajectories satisfying a smooth state constraint: improved estimates, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 56(5) (2011) 1090–1096.https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2010.2088670Google Scholar
- A. Bressan, G. Facchi: Trajectories of differential inclusions with state constraints, J. Diff. Equations 250 (2011) 2267–2281.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2010.12.021Google Scholar
- F. H. Clarke: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, Wiley, New York (1983).Google Scholar
- A. Yu. Dubovitskii, A. A. Milyutin: Extremum problems in the presence of restrictions, U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 5(3) (1965) 1–80.https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(65)90148-5Google Scholar
- M. M. A. Ferreira, F. A. C. C. Fontes, R. Vinter: Nondegenerate necessary conditions for nonconvex optimal control problems with state constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 233(1) (1999) 116–129.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1999.6270Google Scholar
- M. M. A. Ferreira, R. Vinter: When is the maximum principle for state constrained problems nondegenerate?, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 187(2) (1994) 438–467.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1994.1366Google Scholar
- F. A. C. C. Fontes, S. O. Lopes, R. de Pinho: On constraint qualifications for nondegenerate neccesary conditions of optimality applied to optimal control problems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 29(2) (2011) 559–575.https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2011.29.559Google Scholar
- F. A. C. C. Fontes, S. O. Lopes: Normal forms of necessary conditions for dynamic optimization problems with pathwise inequality constraints, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 399(1) (2013) 27–37.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.09.049Google Scholar
- H. Frankowska: Normality of the maximum principle for absolutely continuous solutions to Bolza problems under state constraints, Control Cybern. 38(4B) (2009) 1327–1340.Google Scholar
- H. Frankowska, D. Tonon: Inward pointing trajectories, normality of the maximum principle and the non occurrence of the Lavrentieff phenomenon in optimal control under state constraints, J. Convex Analysis 20(4) (2013) 1147–1180.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca20062Google Scholar
- R. A. Poliquin, R. T. Rockafellar, L. Thibault: Local differentiability of distance functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000) 5231–5249.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02550-2Google Scholar
- M. Palladino, R. B. Vinter: Minimizers that are not also relaxed minimizers, SIAM J. Control Optim. 52(4) (2014) 2164–2179.https://doi.org/10.1137/130909627Google Scholar
- F. Rampazzo, R. B. Vinter: A theorem on existence of neighboring trajectories satisfying a state constraint, with applications to optimal control, IMA J. Math. Control Inf. 16 (1999) 335–351.https://doi.org/10.1093/imamci/16.4.335Google Scholar
- F. Rampazzo, R. B. Vinter: Degenerate optimal control problems with state constraints, SIAM J. Control Optim. 39 (2000) 989–1007.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012998340223Google Scholar
- R. T. Rockafellar: Clarke’s tangent cones and the boundaries of closed sets in Rn, Nonlinear Anal. 3(1) (1979) 145–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(79)90044-0Google Scholar
- R. B. Vinter: Optimal Control, Birkhäuser, Boston (2000).Google Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2016. Rights now held by Banach Press.
