In terms of sup-inf convolutions we characterize the class CWC(γ)\mathcal{CWC}(\gamma) of convolutionally weakly convex functions, that is a special class of Φ-convex functions, generated by the function γ. Motivated by Moreau-Yosida and Lasry-Lions regularizations, we consider a subclass of CWC(γ)\mathcal{CWC}(\gamma), namely, the class RCWC(γ)\mathcal{RCWC}(\gamma) of regularly convolutionally weakly convex functions. We show that under reasonable assumptions on γ the class RCWC(γ)\mathcal{RCWC}(\gamma) is the same as the class WC(γ)\mathcal{WC}(\gamma), introduced from other considerations.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Grigorii E. Ivanov

Dept. of Higher Mathematics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutski str. 9, Dolgoprudny – Moscow region, Russia 141700

givanov@mail.mipt.ru
  1. S. Dolecki, S. Kurcyusz: On Φ-convexity in extremal problems, SIAM J. Control Optim. 16 (1978) 277–300.https://doi.org/10.1137/0316018Google Scholar
  2. J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty, M.-L. Mazure: Formulations variationnelles de l’addition parallele et de la soustraction parallele d’operateurs semi-definis positifs, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 302(15) (1986) 527–530.Google Scholar
  3. G. E. Ivanov: Weak convexity of sets and functions in a Banach space, J. Convex Analysis 22(2) (2015) 365–398.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22017Google Scholar
  4. I. Kecis I, L. Thibault: Moreau envelopes of s-lower regular functions, Nonlinear Anal. 127 (2015) 157–181.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2015.06.015Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Lasry, P. L. Lions: A remark on regularization in Hilbert spaces, Israel J. Math. 55 (1986) 257–266.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765025Google Scholar
  6. J.-E. Martínez-Legaz, I. Singer: On Φ-convexity of convex functions, Linear Algebra Appl. 278 (1998) 163–181.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(98)00003-2Google Scholar
  7. J.-E. Martínez-Legaz, J.-P. Penot: Regularization by erasement, Math. Scand. 98 (2006) 97–124.https://doi.org/10.7146/math.scand.a-14986Google Scholar
  8. J. J. Moreau: Inf-convolution des fonctions numeriques sur un espace vectoriel, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 256 (1963) 5047–5049.Google Scholar
  9. J. J. Moreau: Proximité et dualité dans un espace hilbertien, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 93 (1965) 273–299.https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.1625Google Scholar
  10. J. J. Moreau: Fonctionnelles convexes, Séminaire Jean Leray 2 (1966–67) 1–108.Google Scholar
  11. J. J. Moreau: Inf-convolution, sous-additivité, convexité des fonctions numériques, J. Math. Pures Appl. 49 (1970) 109–154.Google Scholar
  12. J. J. Moreau: Weak and strong solutions of dual problems, in: Contributions to Nonlinear Functional Analysis (Madison, 1971), E. H. Zarantonello (ed.), Academic Press, New York (1971) 181–214.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-775850-3.50011-XGoogle Scholar
  13. R. T. Rockafellar: Favorable classes of Lipschitz continuous functions in subgradient optimization, in: Progress in Nondifferentiable Optimization, E. Nurminski (ed.), IIASA Collaborative Proceedings Series, International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (1982) 125–144.Google Scholar
  14. A. M. Rubinov: Abstract Convexity and Global Optimization, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3200-9Google Scholar
  15. J.-P. Vial: Strong and weak convexity of sets and functions, Math. Oper. Res. 8 (1983) 231–259.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.8.2.231Google Scholar
  16. K. Yosida: Functional Analysis, Springer, Berlin (1965).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25762-3Google Scholar

G. E. Ivanov. “Weak Convexity of Functions and the Infimal Convolution.” Journal of Convex Analysis 23 (2016), No. 3, 719–732. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca23028