The semigroup of convex bodies in Rn\mathbb{R}^n with Minkowski addition has a canonical embedding into an abelian group; its elements have been called virtual convex bodies. Geometric interpretations of such virtual convex bodies have been particularly fruitful under the restriction to polytopes. For general convex bodies, mainly the planar case has been studied, as a part of the more general investigation of hedgehogs. Here we restrict ourselves to strictly convex bodies in Rn\mathbb{R}^n. A particularly natural geometric interpretation of virtual convex bodies can then be seen in the set of differences of boundary points of two convex bodies with the same outer normal vector. We describe how in the typical case (in the sense of Baire category) this leads to a highly singular object.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. P. M. Gruber: Results of Baire category type in convexity, in: Discrete Geometry and Convexity, J. E. Goodman, E. Lutwak, J. Malkevitch, R. Pollack (eds.), Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 440 (1985) 163–169.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb14550.xGoogle Scholar
  2. P. M. Gruber: Baire categories in convexity, in: Handbook of Convex Geometry, P. M. Gruber, J. M. Wills (eds.), vol. B, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1993) 1327–1346.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-89597-4.50021-4Google Scholar
  3. R. Langevin, G. Levitt, H. Rosenberg: Hérissons et multihérissons (enveloppes parametrées par leur application de Gauss), in: Singularities, Banach Center Publications 20, PWN, Warsaw (1988) 245–253.https://doi.org/10.4064/-20-1-245-253Google Scholar
  4. Y. Martinez-Maure: Étude des différences de corps convex plans, Ann. Polon. Math. 72 (1999) 71–78.https://doi.org/10.4064/ap-72-1-71-78Google Scholar
  5. Y. Martinez-Maure: Théorie des hérissons et polytopes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003) 241–244.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-073X(03)00020-7Google Scholar
  6. Y. Martinez-Maure: Geometric study of Minkowski differences of plane convex bodies, Canad. J. Math. 58 (2006) 600–624.https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-2006-025-xGoogle Scholar
  7. Y. Martinez-Maure, G. Panina: Singularities of virtual polytopes, J. Geom. 105 (2014) 343–357.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-014-0211-9Google Scholar
  8. G. Yu. Panina, I. Streinu: Virtual polytopes (Russian), Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 70(6-426) (2015) 139–202; translation in Russian Math. Surveys 70(6) (2015) 1105–1165.https://doi.org/10.4213/rm9639https://doi.org/10.1070/RM2015v070n06ABEH004975Google Scholar
  9. A. V. Pukhlikov, A. G. Khovanskii: Finitely additive measures of virtual polytopes, St. Petersburg Math. J. 4 (1993) 337–356.Google Scholar
  10. R. Schneider: Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory (2nd ed.), Encyclopedia Math. Appl. 151, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014).Google Scholar
  11. T. Zamfirescu: Baire categories in convexity, Atti Sem. Fis. Univ. Modena 39 (1991) 139–164.Google Scholar
  12. T. Zamfirescu: The Majority in Convexity, Editura Univ. Bucureşti, Bucarest (2009).Google Scholar

R. Schneider. “The Typical Irregularity of Virtual Convex Bodies.” Journal of Convex Analysis 25 (2018), No. 1, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca25007