In a reflexive strictly convex real Banach space we established relationship between the metric projection on some closed convex subset and the metric antiprojection on another ("dual") closed convex subset. Some applications of the result are considered.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Maxim V. Balashov

Dept. of Higher Mathematics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutskii pereulok 9, Dolgoprudny – Moscow Region, Russia 141700

balashov73@mail.ru

Grigorii E. Ivanov

Dept. of Higher Mathematics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutskii pereulok 9, Dolgoprudny – Moscow Region, Russia 141700

g.e.ivanov@mail.ru
  1. E. Asplund: Farthest points in reflexive locally uniformly rotund Banach spaces, Israel J. Math. 4 (1966) 213–216.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02771633Google Scholar
  2. M. V. Balashov: Antidistance and antiprojection in the Hilbert space, J. Convex Analysis 22(2) (2015) 521–536.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22024Google Scholar
  3. M. V. Balashov, M. O. Golubev: About the Lipschitz property of the metric projection in the Hilbert space, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 394 (2012) 545–551.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.024Google Scholar
  4. M. V. Balashov, G. E. Ivanov: On farthest points of sets, Mathematical Notes 80 (2006) 159–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11006-006-0123-6Google Scholar
  5. M. V. Balashov, E. S. Polovinkin: M -strongly convex subsets and their generating sets, Sbornik: Mathematics 191 (2000) 25–60.https://doi.org/10.1070/SM2000v191n01ABEH000447Google Scholar
  6. B. O. Björnestål: Local Lipschitz continuity of the metric projection operator, in: Approximation Theory, Z. Ciesielski (ed.), Banach Center Publications vol. 4 (1979) 43–53.https://doi.org/10.4064/-4-1-43-53Google Scholar
  7. M. Edelstein: Farthest points of sets in uniformly convex Banach spaces, Israel J. Math. 4 (1966) 171–176.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02760075Google Scholar
  8. I. Ekeland, R. Temam: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1976).Google Scholar
  9. V. V. Goncharov, G. E. Ivanov: Strong and weak convexity of closed sets in a Hilbert space, in: Operations Research, Engineering, and Cyber Security, N. J. Daras and T. M. Rassias (eds.), Springer Optimization and Its Applications 113 (2017) 259–297.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51500-7_12Google Scholar
  10. G. E. Ivanov: Farthest points and strong convexity of sets, Mathematical Notes 87 (2010) 355–366.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434610030065Google Scholar
  11. G. E. Ivanov: Sharp estimates for the moduli of continuity of metric projections onto weakly convex sets, Izvestiya: Mathematics 79 (2015) 668–697.https://doi.org/10.1070/IM2015v079n04ABEH002757Google Scholar
  12. J. Lindenstrauss, L. Tzafriri: Classical Banach Spaces II, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1979).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-35347-9Google Scholar
  13. J.-P. Penot: Continuity properties of projection operators, J. Inequalities Appl. 2005 (2005) 509–521.https://doi.org/10.1155/JIA.2005.509Google Scholar
  14. S. B. Stechkin: Approximative properties of sets in linear normed spaces, Revue Math. Pures Appl. 8 (1963) 5–18.Google Scholar

M. V. Balashov, G. E. Ivanov. “The Farthest and the Nearest Points of Sets.” Journal of Convex Analysis 25 (2018), No. 3, 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca25065