We provide a dual characterisation of the weak∗^*-closure of a finite sum of cones in L∞L^\infty adapted to a discrete time filtration Ft\cF_t: the ttht^{th} cone in the sum contains bounded random variables that are Ft\cF_t-measurable. Hence we obtain a generalisation of F. Delbaen's m-stability condition [The structure of m-stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neutral measures, in: In Memoriam Paul-Andr{é} Meyer, Springer, Berlin et al. (2006) 215–258] for the problem of reserving in a collection of numéraires V, called V-m-stability, provided these cones arise from acceptance sets of a dynamic coherent measure of risk [see P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, and D. Heath: Thinking coherently, Risk 10 (1997) 68–71; Coherent measures of risk, Math. Finance 9(3) (1999) 203–228]. We also prove that V-m-stability is equivalent to time-consistency when reserving in portfolios of V, which is of particular interest to insurers.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Abdelkarem Berkaoui

College of Sciences, Al-Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University, P. O. Box 84880, Riyadh 11681, Saudi Arabia

berkaoui@yahoo.fr
  1. B. Acciaio, H. Föllmer, I. Penner: Risk assessment for uncertain cash flows: Model ambiguity, discounting ambiguity, and the role of bubbles, Finance and Stochastics 16(4) (2012) 669–709.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-012-0176-1Google Scholar
  2. P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, D. Heath: Thinking coherently, Risks 10 (1997) 68–71.Google Scholar
  3. P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, D. Heath: Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance 9(3) (1999) 203–228.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068Google Scholar
  4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework, Bank for International Settlements, Basel (2013).Google Scholar
  5. F. Bellini, E. Rosazza Gianin: On Haezendonck risk measures, J. Banking and Finance 32(6) (2008) 986–994.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.07.007Google Scholar
  6. K. Boda, J. A. Filar: Time consistent dynamic risk measures, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 63(1) (2006) 169–186.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-005-0045-1Google Scholar
  7. P. Cheridito, M. Stadje: Time-inconsistency of var and time-consistent alternatives, Finance Research Letters 6(1) (2009) 40–46.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2008.10.002Google Scholar
  8. F. Delbaen: The structure of m-stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neutral measures, in: In Memoriam Paul-André Meyer, Springer, Berlin et al. (2006) 215–258.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35513-7_17Google Scholar
  9. K. Detlefsen, G. Scandolo: Conditional and dynamic convex risk measures, Finance and Stochastics 9(4) (2005) 539–561.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-005-0159-6Google Scholar
  10. P. Embrechts, G. Puccetti, L. Rüschendorf, R. Wang, A. Beleraj: An academic response to Basel 3.5, Risks 2(1) (2014) 25–48.https://doi.org/10.3390/risks2010025Google Scholar
  11. H. Föllmer, A. Schied: Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete Time, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2011).https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218053Google Scholar
  12. E. Rosazza Gianin: Risk measures via g-expectations, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 39(1) (2006) 19–34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.01.002Google Scholar
  13. F. Riedel: Dynamic coherent risk measures, Stochastic Processes and their Applications 112(2) (2004) 185–200.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2004.03.004Google Scholar
  14. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015).Google Scholar
  15. B. Roorda, J. M. Schumacher, J. Engwerda: Coherent acceptability measures in multiperiod models, Mathematical Finance 15(4) (2005) 589–612.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2005.00252.xGoogle Scholar

S. Jacka, S. Armstrong, A. Berkaoui. “On Representing and Hedging Claims for Coherent Risk Measures.” Journal of Convex Analysis 26 (2019), No. 1, 245–267. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca26014