Abstract
We provide a dual characterisation of the weak-closure of a finite sum of cones in adapted to a discrete time filtration : the cone in the sum contains bounded random variables that are -measurable. Hence we obtain a generalisation of F. Delbaen's m-stability condition [The structure of m-stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neutral measures, in: In Memoriam Paul-Andr{é} Meyer, Springer, Berlin et al. (2006) 215–258] for the problem of reserving in a collection of numéraires V, called V-m-stability, provided these cones arise from acceptance sets of a dynamic coherent measure of risk [see P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, and D. Heath: Thinking coherently, Risk 10 (1997) 68–71; Coherent measures of risk, Math. Finance 9(3) (1999) 203–228]. We also prove that V-m-stability is equivalent to time-consistency when reserving in portfolios of V, which is of particular interest to insurers.
References
- B. Acciaio, H. Föllmer, I. Penner: Risk assessment for uncertain cash flows: Model ambiguity, discounting ambiguity, and the role of bubbles, Finance and Stochastics 16(4) (2012) 669–709.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-012-0176-1Google Scholar
- P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, D. Heath: Thinking coherently, Risks 10 (1997) 68–71.Google Scholar
- P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, D. Heath: Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance 9(3) (1999) 203–228.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068Google Scholar
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework, Bank for International Settlements, Basel (2013).Google Scholar
- F. Bellini, E. Rosazza Gianin: On Haezendonck risk measures, J. Banking and Finance 32(6) (2008) 986–994.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.07.007Google Scholar
- K. Boda, J. A. Filar: Time consistent dynamic risk measures, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 63(1) (2006) 169–186.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-005-0045-1Google Scholar
- P. Cheridito, M. Stadje: Time-inconsistency of var and time-consistent alternatives, Finance Research Letters 6(1) (2009) 40–46.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2008.10.002Google Scholar
- F. Delbaen: The structure of m-stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neutral measures, in: In Memoriam Paul-André Meyer, Springer, Berlin et al. (2006) 215–258.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35513-7_17Google Scholar
- K. Detlefsen, G. Scandolo: Conditional and dynamic convex risk measures, Finance and Stochastics 9(4) (2005) 539–561.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-005-0159-6Google Scholar
- P. Embrechts, G. Puccetti, L. Rüschendorf, R. Wang, A. Beleraj: An academic response to Basel 3.5, Risks 2(1) (2014) 25–48.https://doi.org/10.3390/risks2010025Google Scholar
- H. Föllmer, A. Schied: Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete Time, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2011).https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218053Google Scholar
- E. Rosazza Gianin: Risk measures via g-expectations, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 39(1) (2006) 19–34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.01.002Google Scholar
- F. Riedel: Dynamic coherent risk measures, Stochastic Processes and their Applications 112(2) (2004) 185–200.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2004.03.004Google Scholar
- R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015).Google Scholar
- B. Roorda, J. M. Schumacher, J. Engwerda: Coherent acceptability measures in multiperiod models, Mathematical Finance 15(4) (2005) 589–612.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2005.00252.xGoogle Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2019. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.
