Abstract
We provide convex decompositions for the convex open sets with polytopes or finite sets removed, some of which are minimal in a certain sense. The valence of a function , whose restrictions to all convex subsets of are injective, cannot exceed the number of convex components of such decompositions. It is therefore worth to investigate the smallest number of convex subsets of needed to cover . While the convex decompositions of the mentioned open complements are the main issue of this paper, a few remarks on this smallest number are provided by the end of the paper in the last section.
References
- W. Alexander: Functions which map the interior of the unit circle upon simple regions, Ann. of Math. 17 (1915/1916) 12–22.https://doi.org/10.2307/2007212Google Scholar
- M. Breen: Decomposition theorems for 3-convex subsets of the plane, Pacific J. Math. 53(1) (1974) 43–57.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1974.53.43Google Scholar
- M. do Carmo, E. Lima: Isometric immersions with semi-definite second quadratic forms, Arch. Math. (Basel) 20 (1969) 173–175.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01899010Google Scholar
- M. do Carmo: Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1976).Google Scholar
- D. Gale, H. Nikaidô: The Jacobian matrix and the global univalence of mappings, Math. Ann. 159 (1965) 81–93.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01360282Google Scholar
- M. W. Hirsch: Differential Topology, Springer, New York et al. (1976).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9449-5Google Scholar
- J. F. Lawrence, W. R. Hare, J. W. Kenelly: Finite unions of convex sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 34(1) (1972) 225–228.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1972-0291952-4Google Scholar
- R. L. McKinney: On unions of two convex sets, Canad. J. Math. 18 (1966) 883–886.https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1966-088-7Google Scholar
- A. P. Morse: The behaviour of a function on its critical set, Ann. of Math. 40(1) (1939) 62–70.https://doi.org/10.2307/1968544Google Scholar
- G. Neumann: Valence of complex-valued planar harmonic functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357(8) (2004) 3133–3167.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-04-03678-5Google Scholar
- K. Noshiro: On the theory of schlicht functions, J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. Jap., Ser. I Math. 2(3) (1934) 129–155.https://doi.org/10.14492/hokmj/1531209828Google Scholar
- R. S. Palais, C-l. Terng: Critical Point Theory and Submanifold Geometry, Lect. Notes in Mathematics 1353, Springer, Berlin et al. (1988).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0087442Google Scholar
- A. Sard: The measure of the critical values of differentiable maps, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1942) 883–890.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1942-07811-6Google Scholar
- S. Shlomo: Lectures on Differential Geometry, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1964).Google Scholar
- S. R. Tims: A theorem on functions schlicht in convex domains, Proc. London Math. Soc. 3(1) (1951) 200–205.https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-1.1.200Google Scholar
- F. A. Valentine: A three point convexity property, Pacific J. Math. 7 (1957) 1227–1235.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1957.7.1227Google Scholar
- S. E. Warschawski: On the higher derivatives at the boundary in conformal mapping, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 38 (1935) 310–340.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1935-1501813-XGoogle Scholar
- R. Webster: Convexity, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994).https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198531470.001.0001Google Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2019. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.
