We consider a stationary quasi-variational inequality in a multi-connected domain and show the existence of a solution to the inequality. The problem is related to the Bean critical-state model in type II superconductors. Mathematically, we are concerned with a quasi-variational inequality containing a p-curl inequality with a curl constraint by a function of the solution.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Junichi Aramaki

Division of Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama 350-0394, Japan

aramaki@hctv.ne.jp
  1. C. Amrouche, N. H. Seloula: Lp -theory for vector potentials and Sobolev’s inequalities for vector fields, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. 1, 349 (2011) 529–534.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2011.04.008Google Scholar
  2. C. Amrouche, N. H. Seloula: Lp -theory for vector potentials and Sobolev inequalities for vector fields: Application to the Stokes equations with pressure boundary conditions, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23(4) (2013) 37–92.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512500455Google Scholar
  3. J. Aramaki: Quasilinear parabolic-type system arising in electromagnetism in a multi-connected domain, Int. J. Evolution Equation 10(2) (2016) 119–144.Google Scholar
  4. J. Aramaki: Existence of a solution to a quasivariational inequality with a perturbation term, Adv. Diff. Equations Control Processes 18(1) (2017) 39–54.https://doi.org/10.17654/DE018010039Google Scholar
  5. A. Azevedo, F. Miranda, L. Santos: Stationary quasivariational inequalities with gradient constraint and nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, in: From Particle Systems to Partial Differential Equations, C. Bernardin and G. Conçalves (eds.), Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics 75, Springer, Berlin (2014) 95–112.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54271-8_2Google Scholar
  6. R. Dautray, J. L. Lions: Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Method for Science and Technology, Vol. 3, Springer, New York (1990).Google Scholar
  7. E. DiBenedetto: Degenerate Parabolic Equations, Springer, New York (1993).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0895-2Google Scholar
  8. I. Ekeland, R. Témam: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia (1999).https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611971088Google Scholar
  9. D. Gilbarg, N. S. Trudinger: Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Springer, Berlin (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61798-0Google Scholar
  10. V. Girault, P. A. Raviart: Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes equations, Springer, Berlin (1979).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0063447Google Scholar
  11. Y. B. Kim, C. F. Hempstead, A. R. Strnad: Critical persistent currents in hard superconductors, Phys. Rev. Letters 9 (1962) 306–309.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.306Google Scholar
  12. Y. B. Kim, C. F. Hempstead, A. R. Strnad: Magnetization and critical supercurrents, Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 528–535.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.129.528Google Scholar
  13. F. Miranda, J. F. Rodrigues, L. Santos: A class of stationary nonlinear Maxwell systems, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 19(10) (2009) 1883–1905.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202509003966Google Scholar
  14. F. Miranda, J. F. Rodrigues, L. Santos: On a p-curl system arising in electromagnetism, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Systems, Ser. S, 6(3) (2012) 605–629.https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.605Google Scholar
  15. L. Prigozhin: On the Bean critical-state model in superconductivity, Euro. J. Appl. Math. 7 (1996) 237–247.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792500002333Google Scholar
  16. S. Sobolev: Applications of Functional Analysis in Mathematical Physics, Translation of Mathematical Monographs 7, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1963).https://doi.org/10.1090/mmono/007Google Scholar

J. Aramaki. “Existence of a Solution to a Stationary Quasi-Variational Inequality in a Multi-Connected Domain.” Journal of Convex Analysis 28 (2021), No. 1, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca28016