We extend previous results on the dual formulations for an elastic body without fractures to a model of a homogeneous elastic body with fractures. In particular, in the framework of Legendre-Fenchel duality, we were able to provide three equivalent formulations for the problem where the displacement, the stress, and the strain are the unknowns respectively. We also provide a characterization of the image of the convex cone of admissible displacements under the linearized strain tensor.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Riuji Sato

Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, U.S.A.

risato@wpi.edu

Bogdan Vernescu

Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, U.S.A.

vernescu@wpi.edu
  1. C. Amrouche, P. G. Ciarlet, L. Gratie, S. Kesavan: On the characterizations of matrix fields as linearized strain tensor fields, J. Math. Pures Appl. 86 (2006) 116–132.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2006.04.004Google Scholar
  2. H. Brezis: Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer, Cham (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70914-7Google Scholar
  3. R. I. Bot: Conjugate Duality in Convex Optimization, Springer, Berlin (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04900-2Google Scholar
  4. P. G. Ciarlet, G. Geymonat, F. Krasucki: A new duality approach to elasticity, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sciences 22/1 (2012), art. no. 1150003.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512005861Google Scholar
  5. P. G. Ciarlet, L. Gratie, C. Mardare: Intrinsic methods in elasticity: a mathematical survey, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Systems 23 (2009) 133–164.https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2009.23.133Google Scholar
  6. B. D. Craven, J. J. Koliha: Generalizations of Farkas’ theorem, SIAM J. Math. Analysis 8/6 (1977) 983–997.https://doi.org/10.1137/0508076Google Scholar
  7. I. Ekeland, R. Temam: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1976)Google Scholar
  8. G. Geymonat, F. Krasucki: Intrinsic formulations of the non-linear Kirchhoff-Love von Karman plate theory, J. Math. Pures Appl. 144 (2020) 269–282.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2020.07.010Google Scholar
  9. G. Geymonat, P. Suquet: Functional spaces for Norton-Hoff materials, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 8/1 (1986) 206–222.https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.1670080113Google Scholar
  10. O. Hernandez-Lerma, J. B. Lasserre: Cone-constrained linear equations in Banach spaces, J. Convex Analysis 4/1 (1997) 149–164.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca04007Google Scholar
  11. N. Kikuchi, J. T. Oden: Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1988).https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970845Google Scholar
  12. V. A. Kovtunenko: Crack in a solid under Coulomb friction law, Appl. Math. 45/4 (2000) 265–290.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022319428441Google Scholar
  13. S. E. Pastukhova: On homogenization of a variational inequality for an elastic body with periodically distributed fractures, Sbornik: Math. 191/2 (2000) 291–306.https://doi.org/10.1070/SM2000v191n02ABEH000456Google Scholar
  14. E. Sanchez-Palencia: Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory, Springer, Berlin (1980).Google Scholar
  15. R. Sato, B. Vernescu: Homogenization of the elasticity problem for a material with fractures, J. Convex Analysis 28/2 (2021) 711–724https://doi.org/10.68381/jca28039Google Scholar
  16. C. Zălinescu: Convex Analysis in General Vector Spaces, World Scientific, River Edge (2002).https://doi.org/10.1142/5021Google Scholar

R. Sato, B. Vernescu. “Dual Formulations of the Elasticity Problem for a Homogeneous Elastic Body with Fractures.” Journal of Convex Analysis 29 (2022), No. 3, 649–668. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca29037