Abstract
For solving structured monotone inclusion problems involving the sum of finitely many maximal monotone operators, we propose and study a relative-error inertial-relaxed inexact projective splitting algorithm. The proposed algorithm benefits from a combination of inertial and relaxation effects, which are both controlled by parameters within a certain range. We propose sufficient conditions on these parameters and study the interplay between them in order to guarantee weak convergence of sequences generated by our algorithm. Additionally, the proposed algorithm also benefits from inexact subproblem solution within a relative-error criterion. Illustrative numerical experiments on LASSO problems indicate some improvement when compared with previous (noninertial and exact) versions of projective splitting.
References
- A. Alotaibi, P. L. Combettes, N. Shahzad: Solving coupled composite monotone inclusions by successive Fejér approximations of their Kuhn-Tucker set, SIAM J. Optim. 24/8 (2014) 2076–2095.https://doi.org/10.1137/130950616Google Scholar
- A. Alotaibi, P. L. Combettes, N. Shahzad: Best approximation from the Kuhn-Tucker set of composite monotone inclusions, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 36/12 (2015) 1513–1532.https://doi.org/10.1080/01630563.2015.1077864Google Scholar
- F. Alvarez, H. Attouch: An inertial proximal method for maximal monotone operators via discretization of a nonlinear oscillator with damping, Set-Valued Anal. 9/1-2 (2001) 3–11.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011253113155Google Scholar
- M. M. Alves, J. Eckstein, M. Geremia, J. G. Melo: Relative-error inertial-relaxed inexact versions of Douglas-Rachford and ADMM splitting algorithms, Comput. Optim. Appl. 75/2 (2020) 389–422.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-019-00165-yGoogle Scholar
- M. M. Alves, R. T. Marcavillaca: On inexact relative-error hybrid proximal extragradient, forward-backward and Tseng’s modified forward-backward methods with inertial effects, Set-Valued Var. Anal. 28/2 (2020) 301–325.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-019-00510-7Google Scholar
- H. Attouch, A. Cabot: Convergence of damped inertial dynamics governed by regularized maximally monotone operators, J. Diff. Equations 264/12 (2018) 7138–7182.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.02.017Google Scholar
- H. Attouch, A. Cabot: Convergence of a relaxed inertial proximal algorithm for maximally monotone operators, Math. Programming Ser. A 184/1-2 (2020) 243–287.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-019-01412-0Google Scholar
- H. Attouch, J. Peypouquet: Convergence of inertial dynamics and proximal algorithms governed by maximally monotone operators, Math. Programming Ser. B 174/1-2 (2019) 391–432.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-018-1252-xGoogle Scholar
- H. H. Bauschke, P. L. Combettes: Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces, CMS Books in Mathematics, Springer, New York (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9467-7Google Scholar
- R. I. Boţ, E. R. Csetnek, C. Hendrich: Inertial Douglas-Rachford splitting for monotone inclusion problems, Appl. Math. Comput. 256 (2015) 472–487.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.017Google Scholar
- S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, J. Eckstein: Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers, Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 3/1 (2011) 1–122.https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000016Google Scholar
- M. N. Bùi, P. L. Combettes: Warped proximal iterations for monotone inclusions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 491/1 (2020), art. no. 124315, 21p.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124315Google Scholar
- M. N. Bùi, P. L. Combettes: Multivariate monotone inclusions in saddle form, Math. Oper. Res. 47/2 (2022) 1082–1109.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2021.1161Google Scholar
- P. L. Combettes, J. Eckstein: Asynchronous block-iterative primal-dual decomposition methods for monotone inclusions, Math. Programming Ser. B 168/1-2 (2018) 645–672.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-016-1044-0Google Scholar
- P. L. Combettes, L. E. Glaudin: Quasi-nonexpansive iterations on the affine hull of orbits: from Mann’s mean value algorithm to inertial methods, SIAM J. Optim. 27/4 (2017) 2356–2380.https://doi.org/10.1137/17M112806XGoogle Scholar
- P. L. Combettes, Q. V. Nguyen: Solving composite monotone inclusions in reflexive Banach spaces by constructing best Bregman approximations from their Kuhn-Tucker set, J. Convex Analysis 23/2 (2016) 481–510.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca23018Google Scholar
- D. Dua, C. Graff: UCI machine learning repository, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml (2017).Google Scholar
- J. Eckstein, B. F. Svaiter: General projective splitting methods for sums of maximal monotone operators, SIAM J. Control Optim. 48/2 (2009) 787–811.https://doi.org/10.1137/070698816Google Scholar
- P. R. Johnstone, J. Eckstein: Convergence rates for projective splitting, SIAM J. Optim. 29/3 (2019) 1931–1957.https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1203523Google Scholar
- P. R. Johnstone, J. Eckstein: Single-forward-step projective splitting: exploiting cocoercivity, Comput. Optim. Appl. 78/1 (2021) 125–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-020-00238-3Google Scholar
- P. R. Johnstone, J. Eckstein: Projective splitting with forward steps, Math. Programming Ser. A 191/2 (2022) 631–670.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-020-01565-3Google Scholar
- Z. Opial: Weak convergence of the sequence of successive approximations for nonexpansive mappings, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967) 591–597.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11761-0Google Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2024. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.
