Using Minkowski addition of sets, we study linear betweenness in the hyperspace L(X)L(X) of linearly convex nonempty subsets of a normed real vector space XX, as well as in the sub-hyperspace KL(X)KL(X) of compact elements of L(X)L(X). We also study the metric betweenness relation induced by the Hausdorff metric on the latter. While linear betweenness in L(X)L(X) behaves reasonably like linear betweenness at the point level, the analogy is not perfect: linear intervals in XX are honest line segments; this is no longer the case for L(X)L(X), where linear intervals can have exactly two elements. However, when we restrict our focus to KL(X)KL(X), the Rådström extension theorem allows us to view this hyperspace as a linearly convex cone in a normed vector space R(X)\mathcal{R}(X); in particular, all linear intervals are line segments that are contained in the corresponding metric intervals. We are especially interested in the notions of convexity induced by these two kinds of betweenness relation. While all closed balls and metric intervals in KL(X)KL(X) are linearly convex, metric convexity has more nuanced behaviour. For example, the metric intervals in KL(X)KL(X) determined by singletons are all metrically convex if and only if XX is strictly convex. When XX is one-dimensional, R(X)\mathcal{R}(X) is Cartesian 2-space equipped with the max\textit{max} norm and KL(X)KL(X) looks like the half-plane {⟨x,y⟩:x≤y}\{\langle x,y\rangle: x\leq y\}. In particular, all metric intervals – and no closed balls of positive radius – are metrically convex. When XX is multi-dimensional, though, while it is still the case that closed balls are metrically nonconvex, it is now always possible to find a metrically nonconvex metric interval that is determined by a singleton and a line segment.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. D. Anderson, P. Bankston, A. McCluskey: Convexity in topological betweenness structures, Topol. Appl. 304 (2021), art. no. 107783, 20p.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2021.107783Google Scholar
  2. S. Azimipour, P. Naumov:Axiomatic theory of betweenness, Arch. Math. Logic 60/1-2 (2021) 227–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-020-00744-5Google Scholar
  3. T. Banakh, R. Bonnet, W. Kubiś: Vietoris hyperspaces over scattered Priestley spaces, Israel J. Math. 249 (2022) 37–81.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-022-2307-5Google Scholar
  4. P. Bankston: Road systems and betweenness, Bull. Math. Sci. 3 (2013) 389–408.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13373-013-0040-4Google Scholar
  5. P. Bankston: The antisymmetry betweenness axiom and Hausdorff continua, Top. Proc. 45 (2015) 189–215.Google Scholar
  6. P. Bankston, A. McCluskey: On betweenness and equidistance in metric spaces, J. Convex Analysis 30/1 (2023) 371–400.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca30021Google Scholar
  7. P. Bankston, A. McCluskey, R. J. Smith: Semicontinuity of betweenness functions, Topol. Appl. 246 (2018) 22–47.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2018.07.002Google Scholar
  8. T. Bendit, B. Sims: The structure of the normed lattice generated by the closed, bounded, convex subsets of a normed space, J. Nonlinear Convex Analysis 17/6 (2016) 1069–1081.Google Scholar
  9. A. Bogdewicz: Some metric properties of hyperspaces, Demonstratio Math. 33/1 (2000) 135–149.https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2000-0117Google Scholar
  10. S. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe: Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804441Google Scholar
  11. W. A. Coppel: Foundations of Convex Geometry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).Google Scholar
  12. G. Debreu: Integration of correspondences, Proc. Fifth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. and Probability, Berkeley 1965/66, Vol II: Contributions to Probability Theory, Part 1, University of California Press, Berkeley (1967) 351–372.Google Scholar
  13. E. Kreyszig: Introductory Functional Analysis, with Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  14. H. E. Lacey: The Hamel dimension of any infinite-dimensional separable Banach space is c, Amer. Math. Monthly 80/3 (1973) 298.https://doi.org/10.2307/2318458Google Scholar
  15. K. Menger: Untersuchungen über allgemeine Metrik, Math. Ann. 100 (1928) 75–163.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448840Google Scholar
  16. S. B. Nadler Jr.: Continuum Theory, Marcel Dekker, New York (1992).Google Scholar
  17. S. B. Nadler Jr., J. Quinn, N. M. Stavrakas: Hyperspaces of compact convex sets, Pacific J. Math. 83/2 (1979) 441–462.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1979.83.441Google Scholar
  18. H. Rådström: An embedding theorem for spaces of convex sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3/1 (1952) 165–169.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1952-0045938-2Google Scholar
  19. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970).https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873173Google Scholar
  20. M. van de Vel: Theory of Convex Structures, North Holland, Amsterdam (1993).Google Scholar

D. Anderson, P. Bankston, A. McCluskey. “Betweenness-Induced Convexity in Hyperspaces of Normed Vector Spaces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 32 (2025), No. 1, 25–60. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca32004