The paper is devoted to establishing relationships between global and local monotonicity, as well as their maximality versions, for single-valued and set-valued mappings between finite-dimensional and infinite-dimensional spaces. We first show that for single-valued operators with convex domains in locally convex topological spaces, their continuity ensures that their global monotonicity agrees with the local one around any point of the graph. This also holds for set-valued mappings defined on the real line under a certain connectedness condition. The situation is different for set-valued operators in multidimensional spaces as demonstrated by an example of locally monotone operator on the plane that is not globally monotone. Finally, we invoke coderivative criteria from variational analysis to characterize both global and local maximal monotonicity of set-valued operators in Hilbert spaces to verify the equivalence between these monotonicity properties under the closed-graph and global hypomonotonicity assumptions.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Pham Duy Khanh

Group of Analysis and Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

khanhpd@hcmue.edu.vn

Vu Vinh Huy Khoa

Department of Mathematics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.

khoavu@wayne.edu

Juan Enrique Martínez-Legaz

Departament d’Economia i d’Història Econòmica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
and: BGSMath, Barcelona, Spain

JuanEnrique.Martinez.Legaz@uab.cat

Boris S. Mordukhovich

Department of Mathematics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.

aa1086@wayne.edu
  1. H. H. Bauschke, P. L. Combettes: Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces, 2nd ed., Springer, New York (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5Google Scholar
  2. N. H. Chieu, G. M. Lee, B. S. Mordukhovich, T. T. A. Nghia: Coderivative characterizations of maximal monotonicity for set-valued mappings, J. Convex Analysis 23 (2016) 461–480.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca23017Google Scholar
  3. R. Engelking: General Topology, Heldermann Verlag, Lemgo (1989).Google Scholar
  4. P. D. Khanh, V. V. H. Khoa, B. S. Mordukhovich, V. T. Phat: Local maximal monotonicity in variational analysis and optimization, arXiv: 2308.14193 (2023).Google Scholar
  5. P. D. Khanh, V. V. H. Khoa, B. S. Mordukhovich, V. T. Phat, Variational and strong variational convexity in infinite-dimensional variational analysis, SIAM J. Optimization 34/3 (2024) 3163–3166.https://doi.org/10.1137/23M1604667Google Scholar
  6. P. D. Khanh, B. S. Mordukhovich, V. T. Phat: Variational convexity of functions and variational sufficiency in optimization, SIAM J. Optim. 33 (2023) 1121–1158.https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1519250Google Scholar
  7. B. S. Mordukhovich: Variational Analysis and Applications, Springer, Cham (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92775-6Google Scholar
  8. B. S. Mordukhovich: Second-Order Variational Analysis in Optimization, Variational Stability, and Control: Theory, Algorithms, Applications, Springer, Cham (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53476-8Google Scholar
  9. B. S. Mordukhovich, T. T. A. Nghia: Local monotonicity and full stability of parametric variational systems, SIAM J. Optim. 26 (2016) 1032–1059.https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1036890Google Scholar
  10. S. Nakajima: Über konvexe Kurven and Flächen, Tohoku Math. J. 29 (1928) 227–230.Google Scholar
  11. T. Pennanen: Local convergence of the proximal point algorithm and multiplier methods without monotonicity, Math. Oper. Res. 27 (2002) 170–191.https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.27.1.170.331Google Scholar
  12. R. R. Phelps: Convex Functions, Monotone Operators and Differentiability, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin (1993).Google Scholar
  13. R. A. Poliquin, R. T. Rockafellar: Tilt-stability of a local minimum, SIAM J. Optim. 8 (1998) 287–899.https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496309296Google Scholar
  14. R. T. Rockafellar: Variational convexity and local monotonicity of subgradient mappings, Vietnam J. Math. 47 (2019) 547–561.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10013-019-00339-5Google Scholar
  15. R. T. Rockafellar: Advances in convergence and scope of the proximal point algorithm, J. Nonlinear Convex Analysis 22 (2021) 2347–2375.Google Scholar
  16. R. T. Rockafellar: Augmented Lagrangians and hidden convexity in sufficient conditions for local optimality, Math. Program. 198 (2023) 159–194.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-022-01768-wGoogle Scholar
  17. R. T. Rockafellar, R. J-B Wets: Variational Analysis, Springer, Berlin (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3Google Scholar
  18. K. A. Ross: Elementary Analysis: The Theory of Calculus, Springer New York (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6271-2Google Scholar
  19. S. Simons: From Hahn-Banach to Monotonicity, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1693, Springer, Dordrecht (2008).Google Scholar
  20. H. H. Sourab: Basic Real Analysis, Birkhäuser, New York (2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1841-6Google Scholar
  21. L. Thibault: Unilateral Variational Analysis in Banach Spaces. I and II, World Scientific, Singapore (2023).https://doi.org/10.1142/12797Google Scholar
  22. H. Tietze: Über Konvexheit im kleinen und im großen und über gewisse den Punkten einer Menge zugeordete Dimensionszahlen, Math. Zeitschrift 28 (1928) 697–707.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01181191Google Scholar
  23. S. Wang, C. Ding, Y. Zhang, X. Zhao: Strong variational sufficiency for nonlinear semidefinite programming and its applications, SIAM J. Optim. 33 (2023) 2988–3011.https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1530161Google Scholar

P. D. Khanh, V. V. H. Khoa, J. E. Martínez-Legaz, B. S. Mordukhovich. “Relationships between Global and Local Monotonicity of Operators.” Journal of Convex Analysis 32 (2025), No. 2, 431–446. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca32021