We prove that, in any separable uniformly smooth Banach space, the boundary of every a-convex set (in the Efimov-Stechkin sense) is Γ-null (in the Lindenstrauss-Preiss sense). Using well-known results, we obtain that the same is true for proximally smooth sets (in the sense of Clarke, Stern and Wolenski) and for uniformly prox-regular sets (in the sense of Poliquin, Rockafellar and Thibault) in any separable Banach space which is both uniformly convex and uniformly smooth.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. M. V. Balashov, G. E. Ivanov: Weakly convex and proximally smooth sets in Banach spaces, Izv. Math. 73 (2009) 455–499.https://doi.org/10.1070/IM2009v073n03ABEH002454Google Scholar
  2. Y. Benyamini, J. Lindenstrauss: Geometric Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Vol. 1, AMS Colloquium Publications Vol. 48, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000).https://doi.org/10.1090/coll/048Google Scholar
  3. F. Bernard, L. Thibault, N. Zlateva: Characterizations of prox-regular sets in uniformly convex Banach spaces, J. Convex Analysis 13 (2006) 525–559.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca13044Google Scholar
  4. F. H. Clarke, R. J. Stern, P. R. Wolenski: Proximal smoothness and the lower-C 2 property, J. Convex Analysis 2 (1995) 117–144.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca02008Google Scholar
  5. N. V. Efimov, S. B. Stečkin: Support properties of sets in Banach spaces and Čebyšev sets (Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 127 (1959) 254–257.Google Scholar
  6. H. Federer: Curvature measures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959) 418–491.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1959-0110078-1Google Scholar
  7. G. E. Ivanov: Sets that are weakly convex in the sense of Vial and Efimov-Stechkin (Russian), Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 69/6 (2005) 35–60; English translation in Izv. Math. 69/6 (2005) 1113–1135.https://doi.org/10.4213/im665https://doi.org/10.1070/IM2005v069n06ABEH002292Google Scholar
  8. J. Lindenstrauss, D. Preiss: On Fréchet differentiability of Lipschitz maps between Banach spaces, Annals Math. 157 (2003) 257–288.https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2003.157.257Google Scholar
  9. J. Lindenstrauss, D. Preiss, J. Tišer: Fréchet Differentiability of Lipschitz Maps and Porous Sets in Banach Spaces, Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012).https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691153551.003.0016Google Scholar
  10. E. Matoušková: Convexity and Haar null sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125 (1997) 1793–1799.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-97-03776-3Google Scholar
  11. E. Matoušková: Translating finite sets into convex sets, Bull. London Math. Soc. 33 (2001) 711–714.https://doi.org/10.1112/S0024609301008372Google Scholar
  12. E. Matoušková, Ch. Stegall: A characterization of reflexive Banach spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124 (1996) 1083–1090.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-96-03093-6Google Scholar
  13. J. Perkal: Sur les ensembles ε-convexes, Colloq. Math. 4 (1956) 1–10.https://doi.org/10.4064/cm-4-1-1-10Google Scholar
  14. R. A. Poliquin, R. T. Rockafellar, L. Thibault: Local differentiability of distance functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000) 5231–5249.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02550-2Google Scholar
  15. L. Thibault: Unilateral Variational Analysis in Banach Spaces. II: Special Classes of Functions and Sets, World Scientific, Singapore (2023).https://doi.org/10.1142/12797Google Scholar
  16. J. Tišer, L. Zajíček: A criterion of Γ-nullness and differentiability of convex and quasiconvex functions, Studia Math. 227 (2015) 149–164.https://doi.org/10.4064/sm227-2-5Google Scholar
  17. L. P. Vlasov: Approximative properties of sets in normed linear spaces (Russian), Uspehi Mat. Nauk 28/6 (1973) 3–66; English translation in Russian Math. Surveys 28/6 (1973) 1–66.https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1973v028n06ABEH001624Google Scholar

L. Zajíček. “A Remark on the Nullness of Boundaries of Uniformly Prox-Regular Sets in Banach Spaces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 32 (2025), No. 3, 921–926. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca32047