We show that the Carathéodory number of the joint numerical range of d many bounded self-adjoint operators is at most d-1, and even at most d-2 if the underlying Hilbert space has dimension at least 3. This extension of the classical convexity results for numerical ranges shows that also joint numerical ranges are significantly less non-convex than general sets.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. Y. H. Au-Yeung, Y. T. Poon: A remark on the convexity and positive definiteness concerning Hermitian matrices, Southeast Asian Bull. Math. 3 (1979) 85–92.Google Scholar
  2. L. Bunt: Bijadrage tot de Theorie der Convexe Puntverzamelingen, Dissertation, Amsterdam (1934).Google Scholar
  3. C. Carathéodory: Über den Variabilitätsbereich der Fourier’schen Konstanten von positiven harmonischen Funktionen, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 32 (1911) 193–217.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03014795Google Scholar
  4. W. Fenchel: Über Krümmung und Windung geschlossener Raumkurven, Math. Ann. 101 (1929) 238–252.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01454836Google Scholar
  5. F. Hausdorff: Der Wertvorrat einer Bilinearform, Math. Zeitschrift 3 (1919) 314–316.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01292610Google Scholar
  6. Y. Lyubich, A. Markus: Connectivity of level sets of quadratic forms and Hausdorff-Toeplitz type theorems, Positivity 1/3 (1997) 239–254.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009760027676Google Scholar
  7. E. Steinitz: Bedingt konvergente Reihen und konvexe Systeme, J. Reine Angew. Math. 143 (1913) 128–176.https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1913.143.128Google Scholar
  8. O. Toeplitz: Das algebraische Analogon zu einem Satze von Fejér, Math. Zeitschrift 2/1-2 (1918) 187–197.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212904Google Scholar

B. Maier, T. Netzer. “A Note on the Carathéodory Number of the Joint Numerical Range.” Journal of Convex Analysis 33 (2026), No. 1&2, 517–519. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca33032