Abstract

Continuity of the solution with respect to data is a classical theme; for evolution equation this is usually restricted to continuity with respect to initial data and right hand side. Here we are interested in continuity with respect to coefficients appearing in bilinear forms (or in the coefficient of the operators involved in partial differential equations) or in the shape of the domain in which the system is posed. From a mathematical point of view, as noted in previous work of the author ["Quelques resultats en optimisation de domaine", These d'Etat, Univ. de Nice Sophia Antipolis (1982)], the classical implicit function theorem is not applicable for equations of Petrowsky type. We consider the sensitivity of a classical abstract optimal control problem to present the approach. As we consider beams of variable thickness, the partial differential equation involves variable coefficients; in the situation of exact control, the controlability issue seems still to be open. In this paper, we assume that controlability is satisfied. In the situation of classical optimal control, the existence of an optimal control may be obtained classically by lower semi continuity

Author information

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

B. Rousselet

Laboratoire J. A. Dieudonné, U.M.R. C.N.R.S. 6621, UNSA Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice 2, France

br@math.unice.fr

References

  1. P. Aubert, B. Rousselet: Sensitivity computations and shape optimization for a nonlinear arch model with simple instabilities, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 42 (1998) 15–48.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980515)42:1<15::AID-NME347>3.3.CO;2-EGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Aubert: Une méthode d’optimisation de forme en présence d’instabilités, in: Deuxième Colloque National en Calcul des Structures, Volume 2, Association Calcul des Structures et Modélisation, Hermes (May 1995) 795–800.Google Scholar
  3. F. Bourquin: Control of flexible structures: continuous theory and approximation issues, in: Advances in Structural Control, F. Casciati, J. Rodellar, A. H. Barbat (eds.), CIMNE, Barcellona (1999).Google Scholar
  4. J. Céa: Optimisation: Théorie et Algorithmes, Dunod (1971).Google Scholar
  5. J. Cagnol, J. P. Zolesio: Hidden shape derivative in the wave equation, in: Systems Modelling and Optimization, M. P. Polis et al. (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th IFIP TC7 Conference, Chapman & Hall (1999) 42–52.https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203737422-7Google Scholar
  6. K. Dems, R. Korycky, B. Rousselet: Application of first and second order sensibilities in domain optimization for steady conduction problem, Int. J. of Thermal Stresses 20 (1997) 697–728.https://doi.org/10.1080/01495739708956125Google Scholar
  7. K. Dems, B. Rousselet: Sensitivity analysis for transient heat conduction in a solid body. Part 1: External boundary modification, Structural Optimization 17 (1999) 36–45.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197711Google Scholar
  8. K. Dems, B. Rousselet: Sensitivity analysis for transient heat conduction in a solid body. Part 2: Interface modification, Structural Optimization 17 (1999) 46–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197712Google Scholar
  9. Ph. Destuynder: A mathematical analysis of a smart-beam which is equipped with piezoelectric actuators, Control & Cybernetics 28 (1999) 503–530.Google Scholar
  10. Ph. Destuynder, A. Saidi: Smart materials and flexible structures, Control & Cybernetics 26(2) (1997) 161–205.Google Scholar
  11. R. Glowinski, J. L. Lions: Exact and approximate controllability for distributed parameter systems, Part 1, Acta Numerica (1994) 269–378.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492900002452Google Scholar
  12. R. Glowinski, J. L. Lions: Exact and approximate controlability for distributed parameter systems, Part 2, Acta Numerica (1995) 159–333.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492900002543Google Scholar
  13. W. Gutkowski, Z. Mròz (eds.): WCSMO 2, Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization, WCSMO (1997).Google Scholar
  14. J. Hadamard: Lectures on Cauchy Problem, Dover Publication, New York (1952).Google Scholar
  15. E. J. Haug, K. Choi, V. Komkov: Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems, Academic Press (1986).Google Scholar
  16. E. J. Haug, B. Rousselet: Design sensitivity in structural mechanics 1: Static response variations, J. of Structural Mechanics 8 (1980) 17–41.https://doi.org/10.1080/03601218008907351Google Scholar
  17. A. Shapiro, J. F. Bonnans: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems, Springer Verlag (2000).Google Scholar
  18. J. L. Lions: Controlabilité Exacte, Perturbations et Stabilisations de Systèmes Distribués, R.M.A., Masson (1988).Google Scholar
  19. J. L. Lions, E. Magenes: Problèmes aux Limites Non Homogènes et Applications, Volume 1, Dunod (1968).Google Scholar
  20. J. L. Lions, E. Magenes: Problèmes aux Limites Non Homogènes et Applications, Volume 2, Dunod (1968).Google Scholar
  21. K. Malanowski, H. Maurer: Sensitivity analysis for parametric control problems with control-state constraints, Comput. Optim. Appl. 5(3) (1996) 253–283.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248267Google Scholar
  22. K. Malanowski: Sensitivity analysis for parametric optimol control of semilinear parabolic equations, Journal of Convex Analysis 9 (2002) 543–561.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca09032Google Scholar
  23. H. Maurer: Second order sufficient conditions and sensitivity analysis for parametric optimal control problems, in: Abstracts of the French-German-Italian Conference on Optimization (2000).Google Scholar
  24. B. Rousselet: Dynamic response in shape optimization, Comm. 8th IFAC Symposium on the Control of Distributed Parameter System, Toulouse (1982).Google Scholar
  25. B. Rousselet: Quelques résultats en optimisation de domaine, Thèse d’Etat, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis (1982).Google Scholar
  26. B. Rousselet: Static and dynamic loads, pointwise constraint in structural optimization, in: Optimization, Theory and Optimization, W. Oettli, J. Stoer, J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty (eds.), Lect. Notes in Pure & Applied Math., Marcel Dekker (1983) 225–238.Google Scholar

Suggested citation

B. Rousselet. “Sensitivity of Dynamic Structures, Case of a Smart Beam.” Journal of Convex Analysis 9 (2002), No. 2, 649–663. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca09038

Download BibTeXPublished by Heldermann Verlag.

Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2002. Rights now held by Banach Press.