Abstract

Quadratic optimal control problems in Hilbert spaces are considered. We show that well-posedness of problems without constraints for all desired trajectories is equivalent to affinity on the control of the dynamics in the abstract Cauchy problem.

Author information

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Elena Muselli

Dip. di Matematica, Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 35, 16146 Genova, Italy

muselli@dima.unige.it

Keywords

  • Well-posed optimization problems
  • control problems in Hilbert spaces
  • infinite dimensional linear systems

Mathematics Subject Classification

49K40, 49N10, 47B49

References

  1. E. Asplund: Čebyšev sets in Hilbert space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (1969) 235–240.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0253023-7Google Scholar
  2. R. F. Curtain, A. J. Pritchard: Infinite Dimensional Linear Systems Theory, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 8, Springer, Berlin (1978).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0006761Google Scholar
  3. J. Diestel, J. J. Uhl: Vector Measures, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1977).https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/015Google Scholar
  4. A. D. Ioffe, R. Lucchetti, J. P. Revalski: Generic well-posedness in mathematical programming, C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 54(2) (2001) 17–20.Google Scholar
  5. A. D. Ioffe, R. Lucchetti, J. P. Revalski: A variational principle for problems with functional constraints, SIAM J. Optim. 12 (2001) 461–478.https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623400378274Google Scholar
  6. A. D. Ioffe, A. J. Zaslavski: Variational principles and well-psedness in optimization and calculus of variations, SIAM J. Control Optimization 38 (2000) 566–581.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012998335632Google Scholar
  7. B. Lemaire, C. Ould Ahmed Salem, J. P. Revalski: Well-posedness by perturbations of variational problems, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 115(2) (2002) 345–368.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020840322436Google Scholar
  8. R. Lucchetti, T. Zolezzi: On well-posedness and stability analysis in optimization, in: Mathematical Programming with Data Perturbations, A. Fiacco (ed.), Lecture Note Pure Appl. Math. 195, Marcel Dekker, New York (1997) 223–251.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003072119-11Google Scholar
  9. D. Percivale, T. Zolezzi: Well-posed convex integral functionals, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optimization 18 (1997) 379–392.https://doi.org/10.1080/01630569708816754Google Scholar
  10. A. J. Zaslavski: Generic well-posedness of optimal control problems without convexity assumptions, SIAM J. Control Optimization 39 (2000) 250–280.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012998345391Google Scholar
  11. A. J. Zaslavski: Generic well-posedness of variational problems without convexity assumptions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 279(1) (2003) 22–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00339-6Google Scholar
  12. A. J. Zaslavski: Generic well-posedness of nonconvex optimal control problems, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 59A (2004) 1091–1124.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2004.08.009Google Scholar
  13. T. Zolezzi: A characterization of well-posed optimal control systems, SIAM J. Control Optimization 19 (1981) 604–616.https://doi.org/10.1137/0319038Google Scholar
  14. T. Zolezzi: Well-posedness criteria in optimization with application to the calculus of variations, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 25 (1995) 437–453.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(94)00142-5Google Scholar
  15. T. Zolezzi: Extended well-posedness of optimization problems, J. Optimization Theory Appl. 91 (1996) 257–268.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192292Google Scholar
  16. T. Zolezzi: Well-posedness of multiple integrals in the calculus of variations, Ric. Mat. 45 (1996) 201–212.Google Scholar
  17. T. Zolezzi: Well-posedness and conditioning of optimization problems, PLISKA, Stud. Math. Bulg. 12 (1998) 267–280.Google Scholar
  18. T. Zolezzi: Well-posedness and optimization under perturbations, Ann. Oper. Res. 101 (2001) 351–361.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010961617177Google Scholar
  19. T. Zolezzi: On well-posedness and conditioning in optimization, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 84 (2004) 435–443.https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.200310113Google Scholar
  20. T. Zolezzi: Well-posedness and sliding mode control, ESAIM, Control Optim. Calc. Var. 11 (2005) 219–228.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2005003Google Scholar

Suggested citation

E. Muselli. “Affinity and Well-Posedness for Optimal Control Problems in Hilbert Spaces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 14 (2007), No. 4, 767–784. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca14044

Download BibTeXPublished by Heldermann Verlag.

Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2007. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.