We consider optimal shapes of the functional Eλ(Ω)=J(Ω)+P(Ω)+λ∣∣Ω∣−m∣\mathcal{E}_\lambda(\Omega) = J(\Omega) + P(\Omega) + \lambda ||\Omega| - m| among all the measurable subsets Ω\Omega of a given open bounded domain D⊂RdD \subset \mathbf{R}^d where J(Ω)J(\Omega) is some Dirichlet energy associated with Ω\Omega, P(Ω)P(\Omega) and ∣Ω∣|\Omega| being respectively the perimeter and the Lebesgue measure of Ω\Omega. We prove here that for some optimal shape, the state function associated with the Dirichlet energy is Lipschitz-continuous. Then we deduce the same regularity properties for the boundary of the optimal shape as in the pure isoperimetric problem (case J≡0J \equiv 0). We also consider the minimization of E0\mathcal{E}_0 with Lebesgue measure constraint ∣Ω∣=m|\Omega| = m

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. H. W. Alt, L. A. Caffarelli, A. Friedman: Variational problems with two phases and their free boundaries, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 282(2) (1984) 431–461.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0732100-6Google Scholar
  2. I. Athanasopoulos, L. A. Caffarelli, C. Kenig, S. Salsa: An area-dirichlet integral minimization problem, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 54(4) (2001) 479–499.https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0312(200104)54:4<479::AID-CPA3>3.0.CO;2-2Google Scholar
  3. F. J. Almgren: Existence and regularity almost everywhere of solutions to elliptic variationnal problems with constraints, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 165 (1976).https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/0165Google Scholar
  4. T. Briançon, M. Hayouni, M. Pierre: Lipschitz continuity of state functions in some optimal shaping, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 23(1) (2005) 13–32.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-004-0286-5Google Scholar
  5. T. Briançon: Regularity of optimal shapes for the Dirichlet’s energy with volume constraint, ESAIM, Control Optim. Calc. Var. 10 (2004) 99–122.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2003038Google Scholar
  6. A. Chambolle, C. J. Larsen: C ∞ regularity of the free boundary of a two-dimensional optimal compliance problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 18 (2003) 77–94.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-002-0181-xGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Giusti: Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation, Birkhäuser, Boston (1984).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9486-0Google Scholar
  8. E. Gonzalez, U. Massari, I. Tamanini: On the regularity of boundaries of sets minimizing perimeter with a volume constraint, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 32 (1983) 25–37.https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1983.32.32003Google Scholar
  9. D. Gilbarg, N. S. Trudinger: Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Second Ed., Springer, Berlin (1983).Google Scholar
  10. A. Henrot, M. Pierre: Variation et Optimisation de Formes. Une Analyse Géométrique, Springer, Berlin (2005).https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37689-5Google Scholar
  11. I. Tamanini: Variational problems of least area type with constraints, Ann. Univ. Ferrara, Nuova Ser., Sez. VII 34 (1988) 183–217.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824982Google Scholar
  12. I. Tamanini: Regularity results for almost minimal oriented hypersurface in Rn, Quaderni del Dip. di Matematica dell’Università di Lecce, 1 (1994).Google Scholar

N. Landais. “A Regularity Result in a Shape Optimization Problem with Perimeter.” Journal of Convex Analysis 14 (2007), No. 4, 785–806. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca14045