We report on our attempts to disprove the implication from rank-one convexity to quasiconvexity for 2 × 2 symmetric matrices. As a by-product, we have reached a characterization of some laminates, belonging to a special class which we call 3-edge-laminates.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Luís Bandeira

CIMA-UE, Dep. de Matemática, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal

lmzb@uevora.pt

António Ornelas

CIMA-UE, Dep. de Matemática, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal

ornelas@uevora.pt
  1. J. M. Ball: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 63(4) (1977) 337–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279992Google Scholar
  2. L. Bandeira, P. Pedregal: Quasiconvexity: the quadratic case revisited, and some consequences for fourth-degree polynomials, submitted (2009).Google Scholar
  3. B. Brighi, M. Chipot: Approximated convex envelope of a function, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31(1) (1994) 128–148.https://doi.org/10.1137/0731007Google Scholar
  4. M. Chipot: Numerical analysis of oscillations in nonconvex problems, Numer. Math. 59(8) (1991) 747–767.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385808Google Scholar
  5. M. Chipot, C. Collins: Numerical approximations in variational problems with potential wells, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29(4) (1992) 1002–1019.https://doi.org/10.1137/0729061Google Scholar
  6. M. Chipot, V. Lécuyer: Analysis and computations in the four-well problem, in: Nonlinear Analysis and Applications (Warsaw, 1994), N. Kenmochi et al. (ed.), GAKUTO Int. Ser., Math. Sci. Appl. 7, Gakkōtosho, Tokyo (1996) 67–78.Google Scholar
  7. B. Dacorogna: Remarques sur les notions de polyconvexité, quasi-convexité et convexité de rang 1, J. Math. Pures Appl., IX. Sér. 64 (1985) 403–438.Google Scholar
  8. B. Dacorogna: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, 2nd Ed., Springer, Berlin (2008).https://doi.org/10.1142/p616Google Scholar
  9. B. Dacorogna, J.-P. Haeberly: Some numerical methods for the study of the convexity notions arising in the calculus of variations, RAIRO, Modélisation Math. Anal. Numér. 32(2) (1998) 153–175.https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/1998320201531Google Scholar
  10. D. Kinderlehrer, P. Pedregal: Characterizations of Young measures generated by gradients, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 115(4) (1991) 329–365.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375279Google Scholar
  11. J. Kristensen: On the non-locality of quasiconvexity, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 16 (1999) 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0294-1449(99)80006-7Google Scholar
  12. C. B. Morrey Jr.: Quasi-convexity and the lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals, Pac. J. Math. 2 (1952) 25–53.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1952.2.25Google Scholar
  13. S. Müller: Rank-one convexity implies quasiconvexity on diagonal matrices, Int. Math. Res. Not. 20 (1999) 1087–1095.Google Scholar
  14. G. P. Parry: On the planar rank-one convexity condition, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 125(2) (1995) 247–264.https://doi.org/10.1017/S030821050002802XGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Pedregal: Some remarks on quasiconvexity and rank-one convexity, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 126 (1996) 1055–1065.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500023258Google Scholar
  16. P. Pedregal: Parametrized Measures and Variational Principles, Birkhäuser, Basel (1997).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8886-8Google Scholar
  17. P. Pedregal: Laminates and microstructure, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 4(2) (1993) 121–149.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792500001030Google Scholar
  18. P. Pedregal, V. Šverák: A note on quasiconvexity and rank-one convexity for 2 × 2 matrices, J. Convex Analysis 5 (1998) 107–117.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca05-8Google Scholar
  19. V. Šverák: Rank-one convexity does not imply quasiconvexity, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 120 (1992) 185–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500015080Google Scholar
  20. L. Van Hove: Sur l’extension de la condition de Legendre du calcul des variations aux intégrales multiples à plusieurs fonctions inconnues, Proc. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam 50 (1947) 18–23.Google Scholar
  21. L. Van Hove: Sur le signe de la variation seconde des intégrales multiples à plusieurs fonctions inconnues, Acad. Belgique, Cl. Sci., Mém., II. Ser. 24 (1949) 68pp.Google Scholar

L. Bandeira, A. Ornelas. “On the Characterization of a Class of Laminates for 2 × 2 Symmetric Gradients.” Journal of Convex Analysis 18 (2011), No. 1, 37–58. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca18002