Abstract
We obtain a representation of unitarily invariant norm in terms of Ky Fan norms [see R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, New York et al., 1997, p. 35]. Indeed we obtain a more general result in the context of Eaton triple with reduced triple. Examples are given.
References
- R. Bhatia: Matrix Analysis, Springer, New York (1997).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0653-8Google Scholar
- N. Bourbaki: Elements of Mathematics. Lie Groups and Lie Algebras. Chapter 4–6, Springer, Berlin (2002).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89394-3Google Scholar
- M. L. Eaton, M. D. Perlman: Reflection groups, generalized Schur functions and the geometry of majorization, Ann. Probab. 5 (1977) 829–860.https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176995655Google Scholar
- L. C. Grove, C. T. Benson: Finite Reflection Groups, 2nd Ed., Springer, New York (1985).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1869-0Google Scholar
- R. R. Holmes, T. Y. Tam: Distance to the convex hull of an orbit under the action of a compact group, J. Aust. Math. Soc., Ser. A 66 (1999) 331–357.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700036648Google Scholar
- R. Horn, R. Mathias: Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities associated with positive semidefinite matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 142 (1990) 63–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(90)90256-CGoogle Scholar
- J. E. Humphreys: Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623646Google Scholar
- R. Kane: Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory, Springer, New York (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3542-0Google Scholar
- A. S. Lewis: Group invariance and convex matrix analysis, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 17 (1996) 927–949.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479895283173Google Scholar
- C. K. Li, N. K. Tsing: G-invariant norms and G(c)-radii, Linear Algebra Appl. 150 (1991) 179–194.https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(91)90168-VGoogle Scholar
- J. von Neumann: Some matrix-inequalities and metrization of matric-space, Mitt. Forsch.-Inst. Math. Mech. Univ. Tomsk 1 (1937) 286–300; in: Collected Works. Vol. IV. Continuous Geometry and Other Topics, A. H. Taub (ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford (1962) 205–219.Google Scholar
- M. Niezgoda: Group majorization and Schur type inequalities, Linear Algebra Appl. 268 (1998) 9–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(97)89322-6Google Scholar
- M. Niezgoda: An analytical characterization of effective and of irreducible groups inducing cone orderings, Linear Algebra Appl. 269 (1998) 105–114.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(97)00060-8Google Scholar
- M. Niezgoda, T. Y. Tam: On norm property of G(c)-radii and Eaton triples, Linear Algebra Appl. 336 (2001) 119–130.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(01)00310-XGoogle Scholar
- W. Rudin: Functional Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York (1991).Google Scholar
- T. Y. Tam: An extension of a result of Lewis, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 5 (1999) 1–10.https://doi.org/10.13001/1081-3810.1026Google Scholar
- T. Y. Tam: Group majorization, Eaton triples and numerical range, Linear Multilinear Algebra 47 (2000) 11–28.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081080008818628Google Scholar
- T. Y. Tam: Generalized Schur-concave functions and Eaton triples, Linear Multilinear Algebra 50 (2002) 113–120.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081080290019612Google Scholar
- T. Y. Tam, W. C. Hill: On G-invariant norms, Linear Algebra Appl. 331 (2001) 101–112.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(01)00270-1Google Scholar
Suggested citation
Published by Heldermann Verlag, 2011. Rights now held by Banach Press LLC.
