We study touching cones of a (not necessarily closed) convex set in a finite-dimensional real Euclidean vector space and we draw relationships to other concepts in Convex Geometry. Exposed faces correspond to normal cones by an antitone lattice isomorphism. Poonems generalize the former to faces and the latter to touching cones, these extensions are non-isomorphic, though. We study the behavior of these lattices under projections to affine subspaces and intersections with affine subspaces. We prove a theorem that characterizes exposed faces by assumptions about touching cones. For a convex body K the notion of conjugate face adds an isotone lattice isomorphism from the exposed faces of the polar body K∘K^\circ to the normal cones of K. This extends to an isomorphism between faces and touching cones.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Stephan Weis

Department Mathematik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Bismarckstraße 1½, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

weis@mi.uni-erlangen.de
  1. E. M. Alfsen, F. W. Schultz: State Spaces of Operator Algebras, Birkhäuser, Boston (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0147-2Google Scholar
  2. S. Amari, H. Nagaoka: Methods of Information Geometry, Translations of Mathematical Monographs 191, AMS, Providence (2000).Google Scholar
  3. G. Birkhoff: Lattice Theory, 3rd Ed., AMS Colloquium Publications 25, AMS, Providence (1979).Google Scholar
  4. H. S. M. Coxeter: Projective Geometry, 2nd Ed., Springer, Berlin (1987).Google Scholar
  5. G. Fischer: Analytische Geometrie, Vieweg, Braunschweig (1985).Google Scholar
  6. B. Grünbaum: Convex Polytopes, 2nd. Ed., Springer, New York (2003).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0019-9_3Google Scholar
  7. D. Henrion: Semidefinite geometry of the numerical range, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 20 (2010) 322–332.https://doi.org/10.13001/1081-3810.1377Google Scholar
  8. V. Klee, M. Martin: Semicontinuity of the face-function of a convex set, Comment. Math. Helv. 46(1) (1971) 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02566824Google Scholar
  9. W. Klingenberg: Lineare Algebra und Geometrie, Springer, Berlin (1984).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96832-7Google Scholar
  10. A. Knauf, S. Weis: Entropy distance: new quantum phenomena, http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.5464 (2010).Google Scholar
  11. R. Loewy, B. Tam: Complementation in the face lattice of a proper cone, Linear Algebra Appl. 79 (1986) 195–207.https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(86)90299-5Google Scholar
  12. P. Rostalski, B. Sturmfels: Dualities in convex algebraic geometry, http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4894 (2010).Google Scholar
  13. S. Papadopoulou: On the geometry of stable compact convex sets, Math. Ann. 229 (1977) 193–200.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01391464Google Scholar
  14. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1972).Google Scholar
  15. R. Schneider: Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526282Google Scholar
  16. S. Weis: Quantum convex suppport, http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3098 (2011).Google Scholar

S. Weis. “A Note on Touching Cones and Faces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 19 (2012), No. 2, 323–353. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca19019