Given any polar pair of convex bodies we study its conjugate face maps and we characterize conjugate faces of non-exposed faces in terms of normal cones. The analysis is carried out using the positive hull operator which defines lattice isomorphisms linking three Galois connections. One of them assigns conjugate faces between the convex bodies. The second and third Galois connection is defined between the touching cones and the faces of each convex body separately. While the former is well-known, we introduce the latter in this article for any convex set in any finite dimension. We demonstrate our results about conjugate faces with planar convex bodies and planar self-dual convex bodies, for which we also include constructions.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Stephan Weis

Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany

sweis@mis.mpg.de
  1. G. P. Barker: The lattice of faces of a finite dimensional cone, Linear Algebra Appl. 7 (1973) 71–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(73)90038-4Google Scholar
  2. G. P. Barker: Faces and duality in convex cones, Linear Multilinear Algebra 6 (1978) 161–169.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087808817234Google Scholar
  3. C. Berge: Topological Spaces, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh (1963).Google Scholar
  4. G. Birkhoff: Lattice Theory, 3rd Ed., AMS Colloquium Publications, AMS, Providence (1973).Google Scholar
  5. C. F. Dunkl, P. Gawron, J. A. Holbrook, Z. Puchala, K. Życzkowski: Numerical shadows: measures and densities on the numerical range, Linear Algebra Appl. 434 (2011) 2042–2080.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2010.12.003Google Scholar
  6. D. Henrion: Semidefinite geometry of the numerical range, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 20 (2010) 322–332.https://doi.org/10.13001/1081-3810.1377Google Scholar
  7. P. Janotta, C. Gogolin, J. Barrett, N. Brunner: Limits on non-local correlations from the structure of the local state space, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 063024.https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/063024Google Scholar
  8. A. Knauf, S. Weis: Entropy distance: new quantum phenomena, MIS-Preprint no. 72, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig (2011).Google Scholar
  9. R. Loewy, B. S. Tam: Complementation in the face lattice of a proper cone, Linear Algebra Appl. 79 (1986) 195–207.https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(86)90299-5Google Scholar
  10. M. P. Müller, C. Ududec: The power of reversible computation determines the self-duality of quantum theory, arXiv:1110.3516v1 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130401Google Scholar
  11. T. Netzer, D. Plaumann, M. Schweighofer: Exposed faces of semidefinitely representable sets, SIAM J. Optim. 20 (2010) 1944–1955.https://doi.org/10.1137/090750196Google Scholar
  12. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1972).Google Scholar
  13. L. Rodman, I. M. Spitkovsky: 3 × 3 matrices with a flat portion on the boundary of the numerical range, Linear Algebra Appl. 397 (2005) 193–207.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2004.10.014Google Scholar
  14. R. Sanyal, F. Sottile, B. Sturmfels: Orbitopes, Mathematika 57 (2011) 275–314.https://doi.org/10.1112/S002557931100132XGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Schneider: Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526282Google Scholar
  16. S. Weis: A note on touching cones and faces, J. Convex Analysis 19 (2012).https://doi.org/10.68381/jca19019Google Scholar
  17. S. Weis: Quantum convex suppport, Linear Algebra Appl. 435 (2011) 3168–3188; correction: Linear Algebra Appl. 436(1) (2012) p. xvi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2011.06.004Google Scholar
  18. A. Wilce: Four and a half axioms for finite dimensional quantum mechanics, arXiv:0912.5530 (2009).Google Scholar

S. Weis. “Duality of Non-Exposed Faces.” Journal of Convex Analysis 19 (2012), No. 3, 815–835. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca19042