We deal with the variant of Decomposition Lemma due to Kinderlehrer and Pedregal asserting that an arbitrary bounded sequence of gradients of Sobolev mappings {∇uk}⊆Lp(Ω,Rm×n)\{\nabla u_k\} \subseteq L^p(\Omega,\rmn), where p>1p>1, can be decomposed into a sum of two sequences of gradients of Sobolev mappings: {∇zk}\{\nabla z_k\} and {∇wk}\{\nabla w_k\}, where {∇zk}\{\nabla z_k\} is equintegrable and carries the same oscillations, while {∇wk}\{\nabla w_k\} carries the same concentrations as {∇uk}\{\nabla u_k\}. We additionally impose the general trace condition ``uk=uu_k=u'' on FF, where FF is given closed subset of Ωˉ\bar{\Omega}. We show that under this assumption the sequence {zk}\{z_k\} in decomposition can be chosen to satisfy also the trace condition zk=uz_k=u a.e. on FF. The result is applied to nonconvex variational problems to regularity results for sequences minimizing functionals. As the main tool we use DiPerna Majda measures.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Agnieszka Kałamajska

Institute of Mathematics, University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 2, 02–097 Warszawa, Poland

kalamajs@mimuw.edu.pl
  1. J. J. Alibert, G. Bouchitté: Non-uniform integrability and generalized Young measures, J. Convex Analysis 4 (1997) 125–145.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca04006Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Ball: A version of the fundamental theorem for Young measures, in: PDEs and Continuum Models of Phase Transitions (Nice, 1988), M. Rascle, D. Serre, M. Slemrod (eds.), Lecture Notes in Physics 344, Springer, Berlin (1989) 207–215.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0024945Google Scholar
  3. J. M. Ball: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 63 (1978) 337–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279992Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Ball: Singularities and computation of minimizers for variational problems, in: Foundations of Computational Mathematics (Oxford, 1999), R. A. DeVore et al. (ed.), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 284, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2001) 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360198.002Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Ball, J. E. Marsden: Quasiconvexity at the boundary, positivity of the second variation, and elastic stability, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 86 (1984) 251–277.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281558Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Ball, R. D. James: Proposed experimental tests of a theory of fine microstructure and the two well problem, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A 338 (1992) 389–450.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1992.0013Google Scholar
  7. B. Dacorogna: Quasiconvexity and relaxation of non convex problems in the calculus of variations, J. Funct. Anal. 46 (1982) 102–118.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(82)90046-5Google Scholar
  8. B. Dacorogna: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, Springer, Berlin (1989).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51440-1Google Scholar
  9. R. J. DiPerna, A. J. Majda: Oscillations and concentrations in weak solutions of the incompressible fluid equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 108 (1987) 667–689.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01214424Google Scholar
  10. N. Dunford, J. T. Schwartz: Linear Operators, Part I, Interscience, New York (1967).Google Scholar
  11. R. Engelking: General Topology, Sigma Series in Pure Mathematics 6, Heldermann, Berlin (1989).Google Scholar
  12. L. Evans, R. Garpiepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, CRC PRESS, Boca Raton (1992).Google Scholar
  13. I. Fonseca: Lower semicontinuity of surface energies, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A 120 (1992) 95–115.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500015018Google Scholar
  14. I. Fonseca, S. Müller, P. Pedregal: Analysis of concentration and oscillation effects generated by gradients, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 29 (1998) 736–756.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141096306534Google Scholar
  15. N. Hungerbühler: A refinement of Ball’s theorem on Young measures, New York J. Math. 3 (1997) 48–53.Google Scholar
  16. A. Kałamajska: On lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals, Colloq. Math. 74 (1997) 71–78.https://doi.org/10.4064/cm-74-1-71-78Google Scholar
  17. A. Kałamajska, M. Kružík: Oscillations and concentrations in sequences of gradients, ESAIM, Control Optim. Calc. Var. 14(1) (2008) 71–104.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2007051Google Scholar
  18. A. Kałamajska: On one method of improving weakly converging sequence of gradients, Asymptotic Anal. 62 (2009) 107–123.https://doi.org/10.3233/ASY-2008-0917Google Scholar
  19. D. Kinderlehrer, P. Pedregal: Characterizations of Young measures generated by gradients, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 115 (1991) 329–365.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375279Google Scholar
  20. D. Kinderlehrer, P. Pedregal: Gradient Young measures generated by sequences in Sobolev spaces, J. Geom. Anal. 4 (1994) 59–90.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921593Google Scholar
  21. J. Kristensen: Lower semicontinuity in spaces of weakly differentiable functions, Math. Ann. 313 (1999) 653–710.https://doi.org/10.1007/s002080050277Google Scholar
  22. S. Krömer: On compactness of minimizing sequences subject to a linear differential constraint, Z. Anal. Anwend. 30(3) (2011) 269–303.https://doi.org/10.4171/zaa/1435Google Scholar
  23. S. Krömer, M. Lilli: On properness and related properties of quasilinear systems on unbounded domains, Math. Nachr. 284(8–9) (2011) 1048–1082.https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.200810145Google Scholar
  24. M. Kružík, T. Roubíček: Explicit characterization of Lp -Young measures, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 198 (1996) 830–843.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1996.0115Google Scholar
  25. M. Kružík, T. Roubíček: On the measures of DiPerna and Majda, Math. Bohem. 122 (1997) 383–399.https://doi.org/10.21136/MB.1997.126212Google Scholar
  26. M. Kružík, T. Roubíček: Optimization problems with concentration and oscillation effects: relaxation theory and numerical approximation, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optimization 20 (1999) 511–530.https://doi.org/10.1080/01630569908816908Google Scholar
  27. C. Licht, G. Michaille, S. Pagano: A model of elastic adhesive bonded joints through oscillation-concentration measures, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 87(4) (2007) 343–365.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2007.01.008Google Scholar
  28. V. G. Maz’ya: Sobolev Spaces, Springer, Berlin (1985).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09922-3Google Scholar
  29. N. G. Meyers: Quasi-convexity and lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals of any order, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 119 (1965) 125–149.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1965-0188838-3Google Scholar
  30. C. B. Morrey: Quasiconvexity and the semicontinuity of multiple integrals, Pacific J. Math. 2 (1952) 25–53.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1952.2.25Google Scholar
  31. S. Müller: Variational models for microstructure and phase transisions, in: Calculus of Variations and Geometric Evolution Problems (Cetraro, 1996), S. Hildebrandt et al. (ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1713, Springer, Berlin (1999) 85–210.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0092670Google Scholar
  32. P. Pedregal: Parametrized Measures and Variational Principles, Birkäuser, Basel (1997).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8886-8Google Scholar
  33. P. Pedregal: Optimization, relaxation and Young measures, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 36(1) (1999) 27–58.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-99-00774-0Google Scholar
  34. P. Pedregal: Optimal design under the one-dimensional wave equation, Interfaces Free Bound. 10 (2008) 87–117.https://doi.org/10.4171/ifb/181Google Scholar
  35. T. Roubíček: Relaxation in Optimization Theory and Variational Calculus, W. de Gruyter, Berlin (1997).https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811919Google Scholar
  36. M. Valadier: Young measures, in: Methods of Nonconvex Analysis (Varenna, 1989), A. Cellina (ed.), Lecture Notes in Math. 1446, Springer, Berlin (1990) 152–188.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0084935Google Scholar
  37. J. Warga: Optimal Control of Differential and Functional Equations, Academic Press, New York (1972).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-735150-6.50011-7Google Scholar
  38. K. Yosida: Functional Analysis, Repr. of the 6th Ed., Springer, Berlin (1994).Google Scholar
  39. L. C. Young: Generalized curves and the existence of an attained absolute minimum in the calculus of variations, C. R. Soc. Sci. Lett. Varsovie, III 30 (1937) 212–234.Google Scholar

A. Kałamajska. “On one Extension of Decomposition Lemma Dealing with Weakly Converging Sequences of Gradients with Application to Nonconvex Variational Problems.” Journal of Convex Analysis 20 (2013), No. 2, 545–571. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca20033