Let VV be a nonempty convex subset of a normed space XX and let ε>0\e>0 and p>0p>0 be given. A function f:V→Rf: V \to \R is called (ε,p)(\e,p)-strongly midquasiconvex if f(x+y2)≤max⁡[f(x),f(y)]−ε(∥x−y∥2)p  for  x,y∈V.f(\frac{x+y}{2}) \leq \max [f(x), f(y)]-\e(\frac{\|x-y\|}{2})^p \text{\ \ for\ \ } x,y \in V. We call ff pp-strongly midquasiconvex if it is (ε,p)(\e,p)-strongly midquasiconvex with a certain ε>0\e>0. We show that if either p<1p<1 and dim  V=1\dim V=1 or p<2p<2 and dim  V>1\dim V>1 then there are no pp-strongly midquasiconvex functions defined on VV. On the other hand if XX is an inner product space with dim  X≥2\dim X \geq 2, p≥2p \geq 2, then there exists an (1,p)(1,p)-strongly midquasiconvex function defined on an arbitrary ball in XX. Consequently, the case when p=1p=1 and dim  V=1\dim V=1 is of a special interest. Under this assumptions we characterize lower semicontinuous 11-strongly midquasiconvex functions.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Jacek Tabor

Institute of Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Lojasiewicza 6, 30-348 Kraków, Poland

tabor@ii.uj.edu.pl

Józef Tabor

Institute of Mathematics, University of Rzeszów, Rejtana 16A, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland

tabor@univ.rzeszow.pl

Marek Żołdak

Institute of Mathematics, University of Rzeszów, Rejtana 16A, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland

marek_z2@op.pl
  1. A. Házy, Zs. Páles: On approximately t-convex functions, Publ. Math. 66(3–4) (2005) 489–501.https://doi.org/10.5486/PMD.2005.3123Google Scholar
  2. F. Bernstein, G. Doetsch: Zur Theorie der konvexen Funktionen, Math. Ann. 76 (1915) 514–526.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01458222Google Scholar
  3. A. Cambini, L. Martein: Generalized Convexity and Optimization. Theory and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economic and Mathematical Systems, Springer, Berlin (2009).Google Scholar
  4. B. de Finetti: Sulle stratificazioni convesse, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., IV. Ser. 30 (1949) 173–183.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02415006Google Scholar
  5. A. Gilányi, K. Nikodem, Zs. Páles: Bernstein-Doetsch type results for quasiconvex functions, Math. Inequal. Appl. 7(2) (2004) 169–175.https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-07-19Google Scholar
  6. N. Hadjisavvas, S. Komlósi, S. Schaible: Handbook of Generalized Convexity and Generalized Monotonicity, Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications 76, Springer, New York (2005).https://doi.org/10.1007/b101428Google Scholar
  7. D. H. Hyers, G. Isac, Th. M. Rassias: Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables, Birkhäuser, Boston (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1790-9Google Scholar
  8. M. Jovanovič: A note on strongly convex and quasiconvex functions, Math. Notes 60(5) (1996) 584–585.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02309176Google Scholar
  9. K. Nikodem: Approximately quasiconvex functions, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci., Soc. R. Can. 10 (1988) 291–293.Google Scholar
  10. K. Nikodem, Zs. Páles: Characterizations of inner product spaces by strongly convex functions, Banach J. Math. Anal. 5(1) (2011) 83–87.https://doi.org/10.15352/bjma/1313362982Google Scholar
  11. E. Polovinkin: Strongly convex analysis, Sb. Math. 187(2) (1996) 259–286.https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1996v187n02ABEH000111Google Scholar
  12. B. Polyak: Existence theorems and convergence of minimizing sequences in extremum problems with restrictions, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 166 (1966) 286–290 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  13. B. Polyak: Introduction to Optimization, Nauka, Moscow (1983) (in Russian); Optimization Software, New York (1987) (in English).Google Scholar
  14. A. W. Roberts, D. E. Varberg: Convex Functions, Academic Press, New York (1973).Google Scholar

J. Tabor, J. Tabor, M. Żołdak. “Strongly Midquasiconvex Functions.” Journal of Convex Analysis 20 (2013), No. 2, 531–543. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca20032