A set of continuous functions defined on an interval I is called an n-parameter Beckenbach family, if each n points of I×RI \times \mathbb{R} (with pairwise distinct first coordinates) can be interpolated by a unique element of the set. The aim of the present note is to characterize such pairs of real valued functions that can be separated by a member of a given convex Beckenbach family of order n. The key idea of the proof is to identify the family with Rn\mathbb{R}^n via a suitable homeomorphism. Then, the classical Helly Theorem guarantees the existence of a proper separator.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Mihály Bessenyei

Institute of Mathematics, University of Debrecen, Pf. 12, 4010 Debrecen, Hungary

besse@science.unideb.hu
  1. M. Balaj, K. Nikodem: Remarks on Bárány’s theorem and affine selections, Discrete Math. 224(1–3) (2000) 259–263.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(00)00136-9Google Scholar
  2. M. Balaj, Sz. Wąsowicz: Haar spaces and polynomial selections, Math. Pannonica 14(1) (2003) 63–70.Google Scholar
  3. E. F. Beckenbach: Generalized convex functions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1937) 363–371.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1937-06549-9Google Scholar
  4. E. Behrends, K. Nikodem: A selection theorem of Helly type and its applications, Stud. Math. 116(1) (1995) 43–48.https://doi.org/10.4064/sm-116-1-43-48Google Scholar
  5. M. Bessenyei, Zs. Páles: Separation by linear interpolation families, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 13(1) (2012) 49–56.Google Scholar
  6. M. Bessenyei: The Hermite–Hadamard inequality in Beckenbach’s setting, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 364(2) (2010) 366–383.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.11.015Google Scholar
  7. L. Danzer, B. Grünbaum, V. Klee: Helly’s theorem and its relatives, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 7 (1963) 101–180.https://doi.org/10.1090/pspum/007/0157289Google Scholar
  8. E. Helly: Über Mengen konvexer Körper mit gemeinschaftlichen Punkten, Deutsche Math.-Ver. 32 (1923) 175–176.Google Scholar
  9. E. Hopf: Über die Zusammenhänge zwischen gewissen höheren Differenzenquotienten reeller Funktionen einer reellen Variablen und deren Differenzierbarkeitseigenschaften, Ph.D. Thesis, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Berlin (1926).Google Scholar
  10. S. Karlin, W. J. Studden: Tchebycheff Systems: With Applications in Analysis and Statistics, Pure and Applied Mathematics 15, Interscience, New York (1966).Google Scholar
  11. D. König: Über konvexe Körper, Math. Zeitschr. 14 (1922) 208–220.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01215899Google Scholar
  12. G. G. Magaril-Il’yaev, V. M. Tikhomirov: Convex Analysis: Theory and Applications, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003).https://doi.org/10.1090/mmono/222Google Scholar
  13. K. Nikodem, Zs. Páles: Generalized convexity and separation theorems, J. Convex Analysis 14(2) (2007) 239–248.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca14017Google Scholar
  14. K. Nikodem, Sz. Wąsowicz: A sandwich theorem and Hyers-Ulam stability of affine functions, Aequationes Math. 49(1–2) (1995) 160–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01827935Google Scholar
  15. T. Popoviciu: Les fonctions convexes, Hermann et Cie, Paris (1944).Google Scholar
  16. J. Radon: Mengen konvexer Körper, die einen gemeinsamen Punkt enthalten, Math. Ann. 83 (1921) 113–115.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464231Google Scholar
  17. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton Mathematical Series 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970).Google Scholar
  18. L. Tornheim: On n-parameter families of functions and associated convex functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 69 (1950) 457–467.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1950-0038383-XGoogle Scholar
  19. M. L. J. van de Vel: Theory of Convex Structures, North-Holland Mathematical Library 50, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1993).Google Scholar
  20. Sz. Wąsowicz: Polynomial selections and separation by polynomials, Stud. Math. 120(1) (1996) 75–82.https://doi.org/10.4064/sm-120-1-75-82Google Scholar

M. Bessenyei, P. Szokol. “Separation by Convex Interpolation Families.” Journal of Convex Analysis 20 (2013), No. 4, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca20050